This is because the NFL is still under the delusion that finding a good QB is harder than hard. Meanwhile, since Dak came into the NFL, how many good QBs have entered the NFL?
Now, I'm not saying guys like Kyler Murray or Baker Mayfield are better than Dak (IMO, the shrimp QB should never be drafted first overall). What I am saying is that it is no longer super hard to find a decent, or good enough QB, who can allow the GM to tinker with the roster and keep good players like Cedric Wilson, Connor Williams, and more who might not be pro-bowlers, but who are good solid players that at least provide depth.
Nothing ticks me off more about Dak apologists than when they say "why are you worried about the contract. Dak isn't even paid top 10 money anymore. Ha ha ha". As if when Dak was paid top money that somehow those years didn't count. Somehow when Dak was paid top money we weren't supposed to win the SB anyway.
Now they are talking about extending him. Hasn't Dak already proven to everyone that he talks a good game when he says he wants to win, but he is actually more interested in making every penny he can? The man makes millions off endorsements. At least some of that money is only being earned because he is the QB of the Cowboys.
Look, this Peyton Manning/DeMarcus Ware line of "it's my job to get every penny. It's the GMs job to worry about building a team" line doesn't hold water with me in an age when players are paid millions, and it is their CHOICE to be an NFL player.
First off, as a Colt, Manning only won one SB. Then he won another while with the Broncos. The Broncos were so good that they won games with a QB who literally could not throw a football named Brock Ossweiler, who the Texans had to pay the Browns to take off their hands (not good scouting by the Texans). The Broncos GM (John Elway) built that team before signing Manning.
As far as D-Law goes. I didn't want to give him that contract either. Yes, he has renegotiated it. But, again, do we pretend that when he was earning more than he was worth that somehow those years don't count? There have been only a handful of players, maybe less than that, who have taken a TRUE pay cut. One was Doug Free. Another might have been Sean Lee.
I wish GMs (Jerry Jones) would do a better job of understanding that star players can be replaced. If they ask for market setting money. If they haven't won a single SB, or sniffed the SB, then let the player walk.
As a fan, at the end of the day. I would really rather be 0-17 than 12-5 and cocked teased. I'd rather have the girl laugh in my face and tell me there's no way, then get me hard and then tell me no.
Until you've won a SB you're disposable. As a QB, you've got about 4 years to do it. If not, bye.
Sorry to rant. I just get so ticked at the commentary from tools on ESPN etcetera. Gee, if you don't extend Dak, where on this planet will you ever find another QB type of shit.
I say draft Hendon Hooker round 1 because if you trade back too far then you've given a team like the Bucs the opportunity to trade up and take him from you. Let Dak play this year and earn his money. Let Hooker take over in 2024. Then give him 4 years. If he doesn't sniff the SB. Bye bye. Try again.