Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,924
- Reaction score
- 6,180
we'll see about that
I’m your number one fan Paul
I call it “operation hobble”
we'll see about that
Long time no See amigo, where have you been hiding?
got any good gossip for us?
This just in: Aaron Rodgers is good.
we'll see about that
No gossip, but fwiw, my boy says for sure 100% this is garretts last season.
Haha. Man, having a newborn eats up all my time. I actually enjoy yard work now because it is "me" time. By this time next year i will be wearing jorts and white nikes with grass stains. Lmao.
No gossip, but fwiw, my boy says for sure 100% this is garretts last season.
my boy says for sure 100% this is garretts last season.
Haha. Man, having a newborn eats up all my time. I actually enjoy yard work now because it is "me" time. By this time next year i will be wearing jorts and white nikes with grass stains. Lmao.
No gossip, but fwiw, my boy says for sure 100% this is garretts last season.
No gossip, but fwiw, my boy says for sure 100% this is garretts last season.
I do not see Dallas winning this game. Something like 24-16 Atlanta is my guess.
All the multiple "packages and sub packages" do is tip off the defense and take our most dangerous guys off the field, both in the running AND in the passing game. DCs have known this for years. We've all noted it, cussed and discussed it here, for years. It's Garrett thinking he's the smart guy in the room when all he's really doing is telegraphing, and taking playmakers like Zeke and now Cooper, off the field - AND keeping his third year quarterback rattled, having to remember all the personnel groupings, what audibles he can or can't call with the group that's out there, and so on. Ginger hamstrings his own offense with all this esoteric shit instead of just fucking keeping it simple.The Cowboys have some real tendencies and cues as to when they are going to run the ball.
Then you're not really paying any attention to detail when you're watching the games. This fucking shit has been going on for YEARS. We bitch about it happening in real time, in the gameday threads even. How can you be a reader here and not know this shit?Not sure if there is any truth to this
The data is easy to come by when teams have entire departments dedicated to scouting tendencies. That reporter was probably just repeating what he was told.No, I know it happens. I was speaking specifically of the Noah Brown comment, which is why I put it in bold. I didnt think he has been on the field enough for anyone to gather much data and then break out tendencies from it.
My main gripe is we don't seem to have enough imagination to get a guy like Brown in a game unless he's part if a whole "package" substitution that requires sitting one or more established playmakers. I don't mind a kid getting some snaps but not at the cost of telegraphing what we're doing.Leave Noah Brown on the bench. I want Cooper, Gallup and Beasley nearly every snap. No subbing.
If Noah Brown is IN THE GAME it's a running play, period.this was written by a reporter that covers the Falcons. Not sure if there is any truth to this, but if there is- then shame on Linehan and Garrett
The Cowboys have some real tendencies and cues as to when they are going to run the ball. The Falcons defense needs to have studied that all week and trust their keys to the running game. If wide receiver Noah Brown is in the game and motions inside behind the tight end, it’s 95% a run is coming. Atlanta has to know those and be ready.
If Noah Brown is IN THE GAME it's a running play, period.
That was normally true, but last week the play Prescott got clobbered on to start the half (IIRC) Brown motioned inside and across, and Prescott was going to throw to him on the play-action.