C

Cr122

Guest
[h=2][/h]


Posted by Rafael at Thursday, March 01, 2012

I spoke to a source today who told me the Cowboys have serious interest in two of the top defensive ends in the 2012 draft class.

Mississippi State end Fletcher Cox produced some impressive workout numbers at Indy and made himself some money. He was identified as a player the Cowboys would strongly consider at pick 14.

I was also told that some teams just outside the top 10, one being the Cowboys, were pleased by LSU defensive lineman Michael Brockers' less-than-spectacular Combine numbers. The thinking is that Dontari Poe's upward momentum could knock Brockers out of the top 10 and into their reach.

CNNSI contributor Tony Pauline released a revised draft list this afternoon which reads like a Rick Gosselin-style composite list, created from draft data revealed by several teams. This list rates Poe 3rd, Cox 9th and slides Brockers to 13th. If this list has any truth in it, the Cowboys could get their wish.

Of course, we're knee-deep into the fibbing season. Which teams would release good data? Would they not be more likely or as likely to give out disinformation?


* * * *

What might an Anthony Spencer extension break down? Here are the cap figures on 49er OLB Ahmad Brooks' spanking new deal:

2012 -- $ 2.85 million
2013 -- $ 6.65 million
2014 -- $ 7.5 million
2015 -- $ 8.35 million
2016 -- $ 6.35 million
2017 -- $ 5.35 million

The 49ers kept Brooks' cap hit low this season and spiked it in 2013, when the influx of new television money is expected to raise the salary cap significantly. Expect the Cowboys to structure any new free agent deals in a similar fashion. They'll have a lot of dead money coming off the books in 2013, in addition to the extra cap money.​
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I like Fletcher Cox, but us taking him at 14?

I'll have to wait and see if he climbs up the draft boards in the next coming weeks.

He'd be animal for us at DE.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
If you feel he'd be an "animal for us at DE", why would you have reservations about taking him at 14?
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,979
Reaction score
8,723
I like Fletcher Cox, but us taking him at 14?

I'll have to wait and see if he climbs up the draft boards in the next coming weeks.

He'd be animal for us at DE.

PFW has him at 7 right now. Kiper has him at 14, McShay has him at 18.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,979
Reaction score
8,723
Wouldnt be a shock IMO. They loved JJ Watt last yr and probably would have taken him if someone had taken Smith before we picked. They also tried to trade back up into the first round for Cam Jordan and Muhammad Wilkerson
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
[video=youtube;wiLP5n4udrM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLP5n4udrM&feature=related[/video]
 
C

Cr122

Guest
If you feel he'd be an "animal for us at DE", why would you have reservations about taking him at 14?

Well, at first I wasn't on board with taking him at 14. As of right now though I'd love the pick.

Don't get me wrong, my first choice would be DeCastro of course. I also wouldn't mind drafting Poe or Mercilus, Winn, if we were to trade down a bit.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I honestly think that DeCastro could be gone by our pick and this would be our second option. After seeing the Giants last year it just makes me want to see us beef up the DL.

As a matter of fact I would love to see us add more than one DE in this draft. This all hinges on what we do in free agency obviously.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
I'm not too impressed with Cox in that South Carolina game tape. He got three sacks, one where he was unblocked and two coverage sacks. If he's going to be drafted as a DE, he doesn't appear too interested in playing the run, he's getting upfield like Ware does on some of those plays and guys are running inside him. But I don't know how representative that is of him.

Personally, nothing I saw there would make him a first rounder in my book. Haven't watched the Wake Forest game though.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Nah. We have a greater need for OG than this. I'm not overly impressed. Not #14 pick impressed. I'd rather go with Ratliff and Lissemore at DE.

I just didn't see anything that blew me away to where I would change my mind about either DeCastro or Glenn.
 
Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
Nah. We have a greater need for OG than this. I'm not overly impressed. Not #14 pick impressed. I'd rather go with Ratliff and Lissemore at DE.

I just didn't see anything that blew me away to where I would change my mind about either DeCastro or Glenn.

I'm with you on this. Get that OG, Hicks wants the F'in World..
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Well, at first I wasn't on board with taking him at 14. As of right now though I'd love the pick.

Don't get me wrong, my first choice would be DeCastro of course. I also wouldn't mind drafting Poe or Mercilus, Winn, if we were to trade down a bit.


You remind me so much of Justin Timberlake's character in that movie called Bad Teacher, starring Cameron Diaz. I'm ashamed to admit that I watched that movie---but was forced to by my girlfriend.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
I'm not too impressed with Cox in that South Carolina game tape. He got three sacks, one where he was unblocked and two coverage sacks. If he's going to be drafted as a DE, he doesn't appear too interested in playing the run, he's getting upfield like Ware does on some of those plays and guys are running inside him. But I don't know how representative that is of him.

Personally, nothing I saw there would make him a first rounder in my book. Haven't watched the Wake Forest game though.



I pretty much came to the same conclusion. I'll admit, that I am biased, but I really do not see anything that warrants all the hype to where we need to spend our #14 pick on. Yeah he had 3 sacks in that one game like peplaw mentioned, but the overall body of work doesn't grab at me in wanting to spend our #14 pick.



On a sidenote, I like the play by South Carolina at the 4:58 mark, where the whole Oline does not move initially, on that screen play.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
I honestly think that DeCastro could be gone by our pick and this would be our second option. After seeing the Giants last year it just makes me want to see us beef up the DL.

As a matter of fact I would love to see us add more than one DE in this draft. This all hinges on what we do in free agency obviously.

If DeCastro is gone, then we need to go after Glenn.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
I think DeCastro is everyones first choice (outside of superpunk).

I'm wary on Cordy Glenn at 14.

DeCastro is a stone cold lead pipe lock 10 year starter, multiple Pro Bowl guard.

Glenn has a lot of potential, but not as much of a lock.

If not DeCastro, then I'm on the "take a guard in the 2nd or later" rounds bandwagon. Deep class for interior lineman.

So if DeCastro goes ahead of us (not impossible), then I like considering all the options.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I think DeCastro is everyones first choice (outside of superpunk).

I'm wary on Cordy Glenn at 14.

DeCastro is a stone cold lead pipe lock 10 year starter, multiple Pro Bowl guard.

Glenn has a lot of potential, but not as much of a lock.

If not DeCastro, then I'm on the "take a guard in the 2nd or later" rounds bandwagon. Deep class for interior lineman.

So if DeCastro goes ahead of us (not impossible), then I like considering all the options.

I totally agree with you.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
I think DeCastro is everyones first choice (outside of superpunk).

I'm wary on Cordy Glenn at 14.

DeCastro is a stone cold lead pipe lock 10 year starter, multiple Pro Bowl guard.

Glenn has a lot of potential, but not as much of a lock.

If not DeCastro, then I'm on the "take a guard in the 2nd or later" rounds bandwagon. Deep class for interior lineman.

So if DeCastro goes ahead of us (not impossible), then I like considering all the options.


I should make myself clear. If DeCastro is gone, then I would want to trade down and get Cordy. Because other than that, outside of DeCastro, I really do not see anyone that I want at the #14 slot.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
I should make myself clear. If DeCastro is gone, then I would want to trade down and get Cordy. Because other than that, outside of DeCastro, I really do not see anyone that I want at the #14 slot.

Agreed somewhat. I've cooled significantly on Kirkpatrick (drug arrest) and Upshaw (stiffness/not working out).

Hate Ingram, Coples.

Intrigued by Poe, but concerned about lack of impressive tape.

I'd punch a baby if we drafted Jenkins or Barron.

This is almost a one man draft for me in the first at 14.
 
Top Bottom