- Messages
- 15,109
- Reaction score
- 2,246
Well, you just negated the comment about Aikman's arm strength being a factor in his favor then. I can find extreme counter-examples for any positive attribute too.
Romo has the whole package (no homo). He's keeping a below average team afloat, and he's single-handedly kept Jason Garrett employed (and even got him promoted) in the league for about 5 years and counting. It's actually kinda sad that Romo hasn't been surrounded with a decent team and a legit NFL-caliber head coach who could help him develop. Aikman had all of those things, and he still bottomed out like a champ after 1996, at an age where most QBs (including Romo) enter their primes.
People keep ignoring all those interceptions and even worse, the stalled 3-and-out drives that kept happening over and over again those last few Aikman years.
"one, two, three, punt..."
and repeat...
The problem is that you overrate the talent Troy had to work with (esp early and late in his career) while underrating Tony's supporting cast. Free agency and the salary cap really hamstrung the offense in the mid-1990s, resulting in the loss of stalwarts like Stepnoski and Gogan. Big E's knee injury didn't help, either, nor did Emmitt's gradual decline. Unlike Troy, Tony didn't take a beating his first few years in the league, which has paid dividends down the road. Tony is the ideal QB to play behind a porous offensive line, but if you compiled a checklist that denoted things like accuracy, arm strength, height, mobility, leadership, and intelligence, Romo might win one of those categories at most.