- Messages
- 2,310
- Reaction score
- 0
played well in both games for sure, did enough to win against det and new england, but in the end we needed them to go on the field and win just like we needed the offense to get on the field and beat ny and ne.
neither unit has been able to do it. We got one good finish from the defense against washington and one good finish from the offense against sf.
neither unit is reliable. Its not stupid to think they have had their problems also, they have overcome alot and have looked spectacular at times but just like in the past under wade and parcells when that unit is on the field to finish a game they have failed more than they have succeeded.
I dont blame the defense for the pats loss at all, but they still contributed by not playing a full complete game. Just like the offense has not.
Ever occur to you that the defense might look alot better to you if they weren't continuously forced back onto the field time and time again late in games?
Our defense is very reliable. They are constantly being put in bad situations late in games though, and no defense can hold every time. They more you put them out there late in games, the more chance there is that the other team will score eventually.
They held the Lions to 20 points, they held NE to 20 points.. we should have won both games.