Dodger12
Super Moderator
- Messages
- 7,519
- Reaction score
- 4,557
Yes, he's the most popular President in history....my ass....
The never-ending POTUS Election thread....
- Thread starter Woodson Bible & Guns
- Start date
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,975
- Reaction score
- 6,256
But, but, but....
80 million votes.....
Never mind the fact that he has 5-10 times more dislikes on every single one of his official White House videos, including the video of his inauguration
And never mind the fact that half of his followers on Twitter are fake
Cuz Merica loves them some Joe Biden
So much so that he can’t get a single fucking positive social media outcome
But he got more votes than any other President in the history of the Country
It could happen.
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,975
- Reaction score
- 6,256
Maybe it’s just me, but something isn’t lining up here.
Prior to the election Biden hardly campaigned at all. When he did show up to campaign he couldn’t draw a crowd. There seemed to be little support for him during his campaign the entire time.
Trump on the other hand draws massive crowd every time and at every stop.
Then Election Day comes.
We watch as votes are switched live on CNN from Trump to Biden. We are told counting stopped in one state because of water main break. Then find out later that counting resumed after the observers went home and that the water main break was a lie.
We have all these witnesses to voter fraud, all these instances of voter fraud, proof of votes being changed in one county from Biden to Trump, and the list goes on and on. All falling in line with the voter fraud theory.
Then we are told that Biden received 80 million votes on Election Day. More than any other presidential candidate in history.
He received better turnout of African Americans than Obama, better turnout of females than Hillary, better everything than everybody...
Yet now that he is elected all we are seeing is how he doesn’t have the public’s support.
80 million votes but he has 5 times more dislikes than likes on his official WH videos.
Half his Twitter followers are fake.
He only has 8.3m followers on FB assuming they are actually real and not made up or padded numbers.
He was so popular that they had to shut down having the public at his inauguration for fear that the public may attack him.
They call in 20k National Guard to protect Biden and the Capitol. Then they have to go through and Vette the National Guard again for fear that they may attack him.
His handlers won’t let him talk to the public for fear he may say something stupid. They won’t let him take a single question from the media.
Where is all this supposed support that Biden carried into the election?
Nothing we have seen anywhere is lining up with the most voted for presidential candidate in the history of the country.
We have seen absolutely no evidence that Biden received the type of support they are claiming. None whatsoever. In fact we seem to be seeing the exact opposite.
Prior to the election Biden hardly campaigned at all. When he did show up to campaign he couldn’t draw a crowd. There seemed to be little support for him during his campaign the entire time.
Trump on the other hand draws massive crowd every time and at every stop.
Then Election Day comes.
We watch as votes are switched live on CNN from Trump to Biden. We are told counting stopped in one state because of water main break. Then find out later that counting resumed after the observers went home and that the water main break was a lie.
We have all these witnesses to voter fraud, all these instances of voter fraud, proof of votes being changed in one county from Biden to Trump, and the list goes on and on. All falling in line with the voter fraud theory.
Then we are told that Biden received 80 million votes on Election Day. More than any other presidential candidate in history.
He received better turnout of African Americans than Obama, better turnout of females than Hillary, better everything than everybody...
Yet now that he is elected all we are seeing is how he doesn’t have the public’s support.
80 million votes but he has 5 times more dislikes than likes on his official WH videos.
Half his Twitter followers are fake.
He only has 8.3m followers on FB assuming they are actually real and not made up or padded numbers.
He was so popular that they had to shut down having the public at his inauguration for fear that the public may attack him.
They call in 20k National Guard to protect Biden and the Capitol. Then they have to go through and Vette the National Guard again for fear that they may attack him.
His handlers won’t let him talk to the public for fear he may say something stupid. They won’t let him take a single question from the media.
Where is all this supposed support that Biden carried into the election?
Nothing we have seen anywhere is lining up with the most voted for presidential candidate in the history of the country.
We have seen absolutely no evidence that Biden received the type of support they are claiming. None whatsoever. In fact we seem to be seeing the exact opposite.
Last edited:
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,760
- Reaction score
- 5,648
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,975
- Reaction score
- 6,256
Those are not the two words I was thinking
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,760
- Reaction score
- 5,648
You should be.
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,760
- Reaction score
- 5,648
John Gill personified.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,885
- Reaction score
- 4,940
I dont get it?
Who's John Gill?
I Googled and found one was a rock climber and the other was a theologian
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,760
- Reaction score
- 5,648
Obscure Star Trek reference that is more than apropros. See "Patterns of Force."
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,975
- Reaction score
- 6,256
Biden seems ahead of schedule
“Within the first five days of his presidency, he issued 30 executive orders, compared with four for Trump, five for Barack Obama and zero for George W. Bush. Those executive orders included endorsement of radical reinterpretation of American history; killing the Keystone XL pipeline, along with its attendant estimated 11,000 American jobs; forcing the military to allow troops to undergo gender reassignment surgery; and forcing federally funded institutions to allow biological men who identify as transgender to compete alongside biological women, among others. He is reportedly pursuing an immigration plan directed toward reopening America’s borders. He has staffed his Cabinet by intersectional box-checking.”
www.dailywire.com
“Within the first five days of his presidency, he issued 30 executive orders, compared with four for Trump, five for Barack Obama and zero for George W. Bush. Those executive orders included endorsement of radical reinterpretation of American history; killing the Keystone XL pipeline, along with its attendant estimated 11,000 American jobs; forcing the military to allow troops to undergo gender reassignment surgery; and forcing federally funded institutions to allow biological men who identify as transgender to compete alongside biological women, among others. He is reportedly pursuing an immigration plan directed toward reopening America’s borders. He has staffed his Cabinet by intersectional box-checking.”
SHAPIRO: This Is Not Normal
For four years, we were informed by our establishment media that President Donald Trump’s behavior was “not normal.” The abnormality of Trump’s behavior became a near rallying cry for the self-appointed heroes of journalism, who spent every waking hour poring over his bizarre tweets and his...
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,975
- Reaction score
- 6,256
Biden “I gotta get the votes...you can’t do it by executive order unless you are a dictator”
Also Biden - signs 37 executive orders in his first week in office
Biden - 37
Trump - 4
Obama - 5
Bush - 0
Clinton - 1
The Hypocrisy on the left knows no bounds!
Also Biden - signs 37 executive orders in his first week in office
Biden - 37
Trump - 4
Obama - 5
Bush - 0
Clinton - 1
The Hypocrisy on the left knows no bounds!
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,760
- Reaction score
- 5,648
"See this is how you deplorable redneck fucks twist stuff and spread falsehoods. The claim was NEVER that he was most popular. You illiterate fucks, the word was POPLAR!"
Dodger12
Super Moderator
- Messages
- 7,519
- Reaction score
- 4,557
And no one will ask him a damn thing about it. If he was in a debate tomorrow, it wouldn't even be brought up. #Pravda
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,115
- Reaction score
- 2,582
The US media, working for the Democrats has become a Soviet-style propaganda machines. Takes this article, which they call a "fact check" for example.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ide-over-trumps-impeachment-trial/ar-BB1d5hIA
Calling something a fact check is supposed to convince you that what they conclude is actually based on facts. But it is mostly opinion, or in this case all opinion.
First, Trump was still in office when he was impeached for a 2nd time. The trial that will be held in the senate is a ruling on the article of impeachment against then sitting president, Donald Trump. Democrats are making up the rules are we go through this process. First, impeaching a private citizen means they can impeach any candidate running for office before an election to bar him from running. Theoretically, if a Democrats control the House and Senate, they can impeach a candidate to bar him from running because he is polling better than their guy. This is total nonsense. Impeachment is to remove public officials, not private citizens. The constitution leaves the decision on private citizens to the voting public. Convicted felons have run for office in the past and some have won. Marion Barry comes to mind.
But this entire argument leaves out the important fact about the trial. Regardless of whether or not it is constitutional for a Senator to preside over an impeachment, the question is, is it appropriate? And how exactly can Leahy preside and also vote? What Democrats are saying is that impeachment doesn't have to be fair.
Finally, their conclusion is just an opinion, Why Roberts is not presiding is an open question. There have been numerous reports from SCOTUS watchers for some time that Roberts was uncomfortable presiding over a second impeachment. One report claimed he took a lot of threats and personal attacks during the last trial and he was uncomfortable going through that again. Another report indicated he did not think it is constitutional to try a private citizen in the Senate. Since when does the Senate have judiciary power?
This "fact check" is a cow pie and the media know it.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ide-over-trumps-impeachment-trial/ar-BB1d5hIA
Calling something a fact check is supposed to convince you that what they conclude is actually based on facts. But it is mostly opinion, or in this case all opinion.
First, Trump was still in office when he was impeached for a 2nd time. The trial that will be held in the senate is a ruling on the article of impeachment against then sitting president, Donald Trump. Democrats are making up the rules are we go through this process. First, impeaching a private citizen means they can impeach any candidate running for office before an election to bar him from running. Theoretically, if a Democrats control the House and Senate, they can impeach a candidate to bar him from running because he is polling better than their guy. This is total nonsense. Impeachment is to remove public officials, not private citizens. The constitution leaves the decision on private citizens to the voting public. Convicted felons have run for office in the past and some have won. Marion Barry comes to mind.
But this entire argument leaves out the important fact about the trial. Regardless of whether or not it is constitutional for a Senator to preside over an impeachment, the question is, is it appropriate? And how exactly can Leahy preside and also vote? What Democrats are saying is that impeachment doesn't have to be fair.
Finally, their conclusion is just an opinion, Why Roberts is not presiding is an open question. There have been numerous reports from SCOTUS watchers for some time that Roberts was uncomfortable presiding over a second impeachment. One report claimed he took a lot of threats and personal attacks during the last trial and he was uncomfortable going through that again. Another report indicated he did not think it is constitutional to try a private citizen in the Senate. Since when does the Senate have judiciary power?
This "fact check" is a cow pie and the media know it.
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,115
- Reaction score
- 2,582
Yeah, the statistical analyses show something about the election was not legitimate and I think there are some people laughing pretty hard right now that the put this demented stooge in the White House. What should really anger us is there is someone whispering into an earpiece in Biden's ear telling him what to do. Every word or gesture is dictate by someone else. And we have no idea who that person is. The guy's own autobiographer says he has lost about 50% of his faculties, and he is sitting in the White House.
This is like a bad joke played on the country, but the people behind it are sinister and evil.
Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,760
- Reaction score
- 5,648
"To address inherited urgent problems."