- Thread starter Woodson Bible & Guns
- Start date
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,167
- Reaction score
- 4,036
cant blame him
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 5,852
- Reaction score
- 4,785
Kamala/Emhoff Getting Divorced? | TexAgs
Kamala/Emhoff Getting Divorced? discussion on the TexAgs Politics forum.
yimyammer
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,167
- Reaction score
- 4,036
Kamala/Emhoff Getting Divorced? | TexAgs
Kamala/Emhoff Getting Divorced? discussion on the TexAgs Politics forum.texags.com
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,886
- Reaction score
- 2,275
These allegations against Hegseth are clearly false, but the RINOs are going to use them as cover to vote against him. The sexual assault charge is clearly a BS story by a woman who cheated on her husband and concocted the story when her husband became aware. The drinking allegation is just a made up crock of dung and anyone can see that. Everyone who worked closely with Hegseth at Fox has come out on the record to claim the allegations are BS. But we saw this with Kavanaugh, and others. Hegseth has to stay in this fight regardless. We cannot let them win these false stories tactics.
But my fear is it is Trump who will back down, not Pete Hegseth.
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,886
- Reaction score
- 2,275
I read yesterday Joni Ernst is still not supporting him. I don't think Murkowski and Collins are on board either.
- Messages
- 58,531
- Reaction score
- 9,038
Trump's a smart guy and he knows the truth here as well. I don't think he's backing off this one.
I think had no one at FOX come out publicly to call BS on this, he might have some reservations. But tons of people are coming out publicly and disputing the BS stories. He also has literally 100's of active duty or former military people coming out publicly to back up his experience and belief that he is the right person for the job.
Republicans that do not support this are going to get the chopping block in 2026 and 2028. And unlike previous years, they didn't have to worry about the world's richest man coming out against them.
- Messages
- 58,531
- Reaction score
- 9,038
Joni Ernst and Susan Collins are both up for re-election in 2020, Murkowski is 2028.
They will all get primaried and lose, especially Ernst. She is a complete fucking moron if she doesnt get behind Trump's cabinet picks, Iowa was very pro-Trump. Collins only hope is she is in a fairly liberal state and Murkowski has one of the country's most crooked election systems to fall back on, but even with that she barely won in 2022.
touchdown
Defense Wins Championships
- Messages
- 5,852
- Reaction score
- 4,785
- Messages
- 58,531
- Reaction score
- 9,038
This kind of mindless babble from the same person who famously claimed "elections have consequences" and then turned his IRS and DOJ against Christians and other Conservatives.
I can't believe FOX posted any of this article. He's a fucking Communist and always has been, now he wants to talk about "lines being crossed" and "pluralism"
www.foxnews.com
I can't believe FOX posted any of this article. He's a fucking Communist and always has been, now he wants to talk about "lines being crossed" and "pluralism"
Obama, in 1st remarks since election, says 'a line has been crossed' if 'one side' makes certain moves
Former President Obama said that it crosses a line for one side to seek to permanently entrench their power.
www.foxnews.com
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,886
- Reaction score
- 2,275
Remember, they primaried Murkowski in 2022 and he opponents actually beat her in votes. But Alaska has a ranked choice voting system and with two republicans splitting the votes, neither got 50% which triggered the second round of the ranked choice system. Murkowski won because she got more second place votes that her Republican opponent. Clearly what happened here is Democrat voters voted for the Democrat in fist place, and Murkowski in second. With this system there is no way to defeat Murkowski because she will receiver all the Democrat 2nd place votes. Alaska has to ditch this undemocratic system.
Creeper
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,886
- Reaction score
- 2,275
The belief is that the 14th amendment conveyed citizenship on anyone born on US soil, but this cannot be true because citizenship was not granted to all native Americans until a legal case in 1924. Prior to that Native Americans were not granted citizenship by birth. The 14th Amendment was intended for slaves born in the US.
The idea that children born to illegal immigrants on US soil was conceived in later legal case. There are exceptions to this laws such as those for children of diplomats. I don't think Trump can change this by executive action. I believe it needs an act of congress. For this reason, I do not believe Trump can succeed in revoking the current standard.