Dodger12

Super Moderator
Messages
7,384
Reaction score
4,315
It doesn't matter. They could surprise us all and throw the book at him, and daddy Tomato Head will just pardon him.

I would expect that and it's the Fraud's right as "President." But I still expect the DoJ and FBI to do it's fucking job without political consideration.
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
2,275
It doesn't matter. They could surprise us all and throw the book at him, and daddy Tomato Head will just pardon him.

I think if DementiaMan pardon's his son for serious crimes, like tax evasion, influence peddling, money laundering, etc. it will end his career, which is over anyway, but even some Democrats would distance themselves from him. Manchin is on the verge of turning Independent, or Republican as it is. Plus, it would make the persecution of conservatives, and particularly Trump, even more egregious.
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
5,853
Reaction score
4,789
Rupert Murdoch and Paul Ryan are not your friends.

The UniParty is happy to funnel money to Dominion. They want Dominion to keep doing what they're doing...

Bannons War Room

Tucker’s Departure Is Part Of Murdoch’s Plan To Silence The Populist Right, WarRoom Discusses

 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,551
Reaction score
9,046
I think if DementiaMan pardon's his son for serious crimes, like tax evasion, influence peddling, money laundering, etc. it will end his career, which is over anyway, but even some Democrats would distance themselves from him. Manchin is on the verge of turning Independent, or Republican as it is. Plus, it would make the persecution of conservatives, and particularly Trump, even more egregious.
I kind of liked Manchin till he pulled that 180 and caved on that Build Back worse bill that he complained about for months and months. Now that he is essentially why it passed he is complaining about it again.

He'll get primaried by the Dems now and they'll put all their libtard money behind some Marxist, and the Republicans will end up winning that seat.
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
2,275


Chip Roy is one of the good ones.

Has anyone noticed how Democrats rant about corporate welfare, except when it goes to the corporations they like?

Anyway, the national debt is the single biggest threat to the American way of life and possibly Democracy. Democrats who think we can spend and borrow without consequences are going to bring the country down. While they warn about the weather 50 to 100 years from now, the National Debt is only a few years from disaster. Imagine the US not being able to borrow money. It would mean forced budget cuts with few options. Idiots like AOC think we can just print money to pay our debts. This is such a dumb concept. Who would lend us money knowing they would be paid back with money worth a fraction of what they lent us?
 

InternetKing

The Elite :-P
Messages
3,577
Reaction score
744

however trumpet might be president if he wins according the case in 1920 in the same article…..

“Notably, there is precedent for convicted felons to run for federal office -- including for the office of the presidency. Eugene V. Debs, a perennial socialist candidate for the White House in the early 20th century, was incarcerated on an espionage conviction when he won more than 900,000 votes in a 1920 presidential campaign.”
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
2,275

however trumpet might be president if he wins according the case in 1920 in the same article…..

“Notably, there is precedent for convicted felons to run for federal office -- including for the office of the presidency. Eugene V. Debs, a perennial socialist candidate for the White House in the early 20th century, was incarcerated on an espionage conviction when he won more than 900,000 votes in a 1920 presidential campaign.”
The judge made so many mistakes in this case it will almost certainly go to appeal. Allowing prejudicial evidence into the trial like character witnesses and the Access Hollywood tape was a big mistake and showed partiality towards the accuser. At the same time he denied evidence in the trial that would have put a light on Carrol's own character and credibility. For example, the defense could not bring up the genesis of the original complaint, who was financing her case, or that she had made similar complaints against other men in her book.

The Jury verdict made no sense either. Carrol specifically accused Trump of raping her in a ridiculous story about some kind of incident that happened in an upscale department store in NY. But her claims were not witnessed by anyone even though Bergdorf -Goodman has sales reps to attend to each of their customers. The jury did not find the evidence for rape but did find Trump liable for sexual abuse, a charge Carroll never made. Plus, they found Trump liable for defamation when he denied he raped Carroll and claimed she was lying. The jury agreed with him but still found he defamed her!

Trump should get an appeal. This verdict should be overturned on appeal as well. The only question is can Trump get a fair trial anywhere in the country? I think not. We have come to a point now where jurors have be questioned on their politics because Democrats have shown multiple times they cannot be trusted to be impartial.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,551
Reaction score
9,046
The judge made so many mistakes in this case it will almost certainly go to appeal. Allowing prejudicial evidence into the trial like character witnesses and the Access Hollywood tape was a big mistake and showed partiality towards the accuser. At the same time he denied evidence in the trial that would have put a light on Carrol's own character and credibility. For example, the defense could not bring up the genesis of the original complaint, who was financing her case, or that she had made similar complaints against other men in her book.

The Jury verdict made no sense either. Carrol specifically accused Trump of raping her in a ridiculous story about some kind of incident that happened in an upscale department store in NY. But her claims were not witnessed by anyone even though Bergdorf -Goodman has sales reps to attend to each of their customers. The jury did not find the evidence for rape but did find Trump liable for sexual abuse, a charge Carroll never made. Plus, they found Trump liable for defamation when he denied he raped Carroll and claimed she was lying. The jury agreed with him but still found he defamed her!

Trump should get an appeal. This verdict should be overturned on appeal as well. The only question is can Trump get a fair trial anywhere in the country? I think not. We have come to a point now where jurors have be questioned on their politics because Democrats have shown multiple times they cannot be trusted to be impartial.
Trump will get it appealed, and will win easily. The left knew this all along, but they did it anyway because they have to have 100% negative Trump coverage 24/7. The woman's story is not even remotely believable.

Once this is extinguished they'll invent some other complete nonsense bullshit to continue their Marxist strategy.
 

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
2,275
Trump will get it appealed, and will win easily. The left knew this all along, but they did it anyway because they have to have 100% negative Trump coverage 24/7. The woman's story is not even remotely believable.

Once this is extinguished they'll invent some other complete nonsense bullshit to continue their Marxist strategy.
I completely agree, but I also believe Democrats on juries cannot be impartial anymore. In fact, I think they lie and seek out juries to convict Republicans and acquit Democrats. The Michael Sussman perjury trial is a perfect example but there are others. Sussman was charged with lying to FBI agents during an investigation. The DOJ had emails and text messages to prove what he told them was not true and he had to know it. If you recall, Sussman went to the FBI to report the Trump alpha bank connection and told the FBI he was coming to them on his own and not on behalf of a client. That was not true. He was working indirectly for the Clinton campaign and went to the FBI o behalf of a Clinton legal firm who paid him for doing so. It was an open and shut case. But the jury acquitted him on all charges. The jury foreperson, a liberal Democrat from Virginia, told the media he was acquitted because " there are more important things to worry about".
 

touchdown

Defense Wins Championships
Messages
5,853
Reaction score
4,789

InternetKing

The Elite :-P
Messages
3,577
Reaction score
744
The judge made so many mistakes in this case it will almost certainly go to appeal. Allowing prejudicial evidence into the trial like character witnesses and the Access Hollywood tape was a big mistake and showed partiality towards the accuser. At the same time he denied evidence in the trial that would have put a light on Carrol's own character and credibility. For example, the defense could not bring up the genesis of the original complaint, who was financing her case, or that she had made similar complaints against other men in her book.

The Jury verdict made no sense either. Carrol specifically accused Trump of raping her in a ridiculous story about some kind of incident that happened in an upscale department store in NY. But her claims were not witnessed by anyone even though Bergdorf -Goodman has sales reps to attend to each of their customers. The jury did not find the evidence for rape but did find Trump liable for sexual abuse, a charge Carroll never made. Plus, they found Trump liable for defamation when he denied he raped Carroll and claimed she was lying. The jury agreed with him but still found he defamed her!

Trump should get an appeal. This verdict should be overturned on appeal as well. The only question is can Trump get a fair trial anywhere in the country? I think not. We have come to a point now where jurors have be questioned on their politics because Democrats have shown multiple times they cannot be trusted to be impartial.
what about the porn star that he raped?
 
Top Bottom