Big difference is what they'll tell an anonymous phone pollster and what they would tell you to your face.I don’t buy it
None of the liberals I know believe for one second that there was any fraud in this election. The ones that will actually admit something might have happened in this election will then dismiss any and all evidence by saying there is always some amount of election discrepancies, it’s to be expected. But they won’t admit that there was any fraud. Just that there was a possibility of human error.
The part that is concerning is that some of them are well educated, typically will think for themselves, and will call bullshit when they see it. But for some reason they are totally blind to the election fraud. I thought maybe they were just lying to themselves and didn’t want to see the truth. But when I press them on it they double down and honestly believe there was no fraud and that ALL the evidence to the contrary was either manufactured or they just simply dismiss it all without reason. Total and complete denial. It blows me away.
Wow
Just wow
Here is your meat and potatoes Dooms
I watched this hearing live and some of the most damning evidence that most folks overlook is the fact that the absentee ballots came in in sequential order. That's impossible. Unless they were all produced at the same time and came in all at once. And the witnesses didn't just give "stand alone" testimony, but their testimony was backed up by other witnesses (re: boxes being carried into the counting center in the dead of night).
If any of them said so out loud they'd be ridiculed, cancelled, and very possibly assaulted....To a great degree, we're not dealing with rational people...I find the claim at least marginally credible.I don’t buy it
None of the liberals I know believe for one second that there was any fraud in this election. The ones that will actually admit something might have happened in this election will then dismiss any and all evidence by saying there is always some amount of election discrepancies, it’s to be expected. But they won’t admit that there was any fraud. Just that there was a possibility of human error.
The part that is concerning is that some of them are well educated, typically will think for themselves, and will call bullshit when they see it. But for some reason they are totally blind to the election fraud. I thought maybe they were just lying to themselves and didn’t want to see the truth. But when I press them on it they double down and honestly believe there was no fraud and that ALL the evidence to the contrary was either manufactured or they just simply dismiss it all without reason. Total and complete denial. It blows me away.
The guy is a trip. I suggest checking out his many politcal videos. He is usually pretty accurate and funny as heck. Someone sent me one of his videos about a year ago and now I check out his channel every so often to see what he has to say about politics although most of his content is about video games which I do not care for. His politcal stuff however is normally pretty good.Based AF!
That link was off his Bitchute channel. This is the same video on Youtube.It’s showing as an invalid link for me
This should not be allowed for any reason. A voter submits a ballot and once he signs it no changes should be made by anyone. If a voter fill out a ballot correctly then too bad. Under no circumstances should someone other than the voter be allowed to alter or duplicate a ballot.In AZ they were allowed to examine 100 duplicate ballots. For clarification purposes a duplicate ballot is when an original ballot can not be scanned for one reason or another (damaged or ineligible) so a poll worker has to create a duplicate ballot on a new ballot so that it can then be scanned into the system.
Out of the 100 ballots that they were allowed to examine they found one ballot that was changed from Trump to Biden and one that just taken away from Trump. So they found that Trump lost 2% of his vote tally in just these 100 ballots that they were allowed to examine
I can’t believe we trust a volunteer poll worker to take another persons ballot and recreate a duplicate which will then be scanned and counted in the election. That is an awful lot of trust we are putting in these poll workers. With the extreme hatred of the bad orange man and the Trump derangement syndrome a portion of this country has, how can we possibly trust poll workers with someone else’s vote??
Arizona GOP finds 2% of duplicate ballots took votes away from Trump after judge allows sample to be examined
Republican officials in Arizona found that 2% of the duplicate ballots the party was allowed to examine were changed to take votes away from President Trump.www.washingtonexaminer.com
If it is electronic it can be hacked. We have the same type of system since the 2000 "hanging chad" fiasco and it makes me very nervous every single time I vote. I agree 100% ballots should never be altered but at least with hand ballots they can be counted manually. With an electronic system it can possibly be manipulated.This should not be allowed for any reason. A voter submits a ballot and once he signs it no changes should be made by anyone. If a voter fill out a ballot correctly then too bad. Under no circumstances should someone other than the voter be allowed to alter or duplicate a ballot.
But this is the problem with paper ballots. Where I vote, up until this year, we had voting machines that are electronic. The voter selects the candidates of his choice and them pushes a button to record his vote. It is simple, quick, and fool-proof. Each machine is independent of every other machines and vote counts are taken from the machine by multiple poll workers. The numbers cannot be changed or fudged. There is no one between the voter and his vote.
Before voting every voter has to sign a "ticket" and his signature is compared to the signature in the a book. The proves identity and also provides a tabulation of total votes to be compared to the vote totals from the machines.