Sturm on Fletcher Cox

[Midswat]

1. Cox
L1./E2. Konz
3. Joe Adams
4. Jake baquette
4. Ladarius green

You're obviously just trying to brown nose with that first and third. And you know what, it's working. I see a moderator spot in your future.

 

[Cr122]

The more I think about it we won't draft DeCastro unless he's BPA. Cox demands double teams. Just what we need.

Try double teaming Ware and Cox, not gonna happen. I'll be more than happy to get Cox if DeCastro is gone.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

The more I think about it we won't draft DeCastro unless he's BPA. Cox demands double teams. Just what we need.

Try double teaming Ware and Cox, not gonna happen. I'll be more than happy to get Cox if DeCastro is gone.

I'd go Cox even if DeCastro is there.

 

[Cr122]

I'd go Cox even if DeCastro is there.

I don't think I would be that upset if we did.

Yeah, we need OL help, but at the same time our DL needs just as much help.

 

[GloryDaysRBack]

I'd go Cox even if DeCastro is there.

Agreed..in my opinion our list is in this order

Brockers
Cox
Decastro

Maybe flip the top 2..but I get the impression we will use our 1st rounder on defense

 

[Cr122]

I dunno what it is about Brockers, but I don't like him.

I'd rather take Poe over him.

 

[dbair1967]

I dunno what it is about Brockers, but I don't like him.

I'd rather take Poe over him.

I'd definitely take Brockers over Poe

 

[VA Cowboy]

Poe is a classic boom or bust. Great combine, questionable on field production.
Brockers, imo, is safer. Nothing flashy, but not as much upside but not likely to be a bust either.

 

[Cr122]

I'd definitely take Brockers over Poe

Not me, dickhead!

 

[dbair1967]

Poe is a classic boom or bust. Great combine, questionable on field production.
Brockers, imo, is safer. Nothing flashy, but not as much upside but not likely to be a bust either.

I actually think Brockers' upside is pretty high. He hasnt fully developed all the technique work he needs. Once he gets some further coaching and experience he could really bloom.

 

[Cr122]

I actually think Brockers' upside is pretty high. He hasnt fully developed all the technique work he needs. Once he gets some further coaching and experience he could really bloom.

Seriously, though, I think Brockers and Poe both have question marks. I give the edge to Poe.

Having said this take Cox at 14 if we go DL and he's BPA.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I don't think I would be that upset if we did.

Yeah, we need OL help, but at the same time our DL needs just as much help.

Your OL needs to be solid. Your DL needs to be great.

That's how I look at it.

 

[jiggyfly]

Your OL needs to be solid. Your DL needs to be great.

That's how I look at it.

I agree with this, you can get away with a patchwork o-line but it does not work on defense.