sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
By Chris Mortensen
ESPN


Optimism is waning after four consecutive days of negotiations between NFL owners and players and was described as trending "backwards," player sources told ESPN.

Player sources said owners have reneged on a simplified formula that would have given players 48 percent of all revenue.

Player sources reaffirmed a setback in talks occurred when owners last week went "retro" on the formula that will divide the estimated $9.3 billion in annual revenue. The players believed the two sides had reached an understanding on a simplified formula in which they would receive 48 percent of revenue, sources say owners reintroduced their previous formula by asking for $400 million to $500 million in expenses as credit off the top.

Players calculate that under the owners' proposal, it would leave them with approximately with a 45 percent take on revenue, an "unacceptable" amount that one player source said "sets us back to March 11 ... before the lockout."

A management source said the owners have not reneged on any revenue split, claiming "it's a negotiation, which is always subject to change"

A league source said the owners were more flexible Thursday afternoon on the revenue-split formula and maintained the theme "negotiations are negotiations."

Player sources contend the owners' terms changed when the two sides convened a day after owners met June 21 in Chicago. A source said the players went into Thursday's negotiating session with owners at the table, hoping to "get them back on track. They wouldn't move. It's disappointing."

Indianapolis Colts center Jeff Saturday spearheaded a conference call Thursday afternoon with player leadership. The call was recessed so players could get back into negotiations.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and NFL Players Association head DeMaurice Smith were joined by U.S. Magistrate Judge Arthur Boylan and a handful of owners -- John Mara of the New York Giants, Clark Hunt of the Kansas City Chiefs, Jerry Jones of the Dallas Cowboys and Robert Kraft of the New England Patriots -- and players including Saturday, Brian Waters of the Chiefs and Domonique Foxworth of the Baltimore Ravens at a Minneapolis law firm for Thursday's talks.

The latest round of negotiations between the two sides -- the fifth since they began hopping from city to city for meetings -- kicked off Tuesday with Goodell, Smith, their attorneys and staffs.

This location is significant because Minneapolis is where the players have filed a still-pending federal antitrust suit against the owners. The two sides met here for six days of court-ordered mediation under Boylan in April and May.

The July 4 holiday weekend has been floated by some of the members of their respective parties as a rough target for a deal, and that time has nearly arrived.

Owners and players are seeking a deal that would divide revenues for the $9 billion business -- the biggest hurdle to clear -- and guide league activities for years to come.

Goodell and Smith took questions from rookies at an orientation in Sarasota, Fla., Wednesday, but they didn't offer specifics.

Smith invited Goodell to the orientation symposium for NFL rookies -- put on by the players' association after the NFL canceled the event -- and the pair flew to Florida on Tuesday night. After a joint breakfast Wednesday, they talked for an hour with 155 rookies before returning to Minnesota.

Smith and Goodell certainly seem closer than when the lockout began March 12 and the hope is that it leads to a new deal soon. Training camps are scheduled to open in three weeks with the Hall of Fame exhibition game on Aug. 7.

Since players don't get their regular paychecks until the regular season and revenue for the league revolves heavily around Sunday games, the financial urgency arguably hasn't arrived.

Rookies need to start learning their playbooks, though, and teams need free agency to arrange their rosters. Plus, a 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel is weighing a decision on the legality of the lockout.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
Awesome news.

I'm almost to the point where I don't give a F if there's football or not this year.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
I hope the players stand there ground and make sure that they get what they deserve along with the retired players.

When they accomplish this I will be standing right outside the door with my ticket in hand ready for the games to pick back up.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
gregaiello Greg Aiello
by newyscruggs
Lawyers are drafting language for potential agreement, sharing it with PA. All kinds of phone, email exchanges going on. Work continues.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I hope the owners stand their ground and show the current players how truly irrelevant they are to the long term health of the league. They're spare parts. They "deserve" nothing. It's not a right to play in the NFL. They already get way too much and if I had my way the owners would play hardball and force them to lose paychecks before they fold like a cheap suit.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I wouldn't say that. The players have already agreed to a percentage smaller than they've received in over 10 years.

All the owners have to do is sit and wait. F the season. You will break that union easily. All the leverage is with the owners.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't say that. The players have already agreed to a percentage smaller than they've received in over 10 years.

All the owners have to do is sit and wait. F the season. You will break that union easily. All the leverage is with the owners.

The players have been solid through all this so far, while the owners have been the ones most divided amongst themselves.

I say it won't matter soon because i think we see a deal in the near future, but the owners have reduced their demands significantly from the beginning of all this. The players simply went from 50 percent to 48 percent. Not bad, imo.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
If by going backwards in terms of compensation means not giving in and remaining firm and united, I agree....the players union hasn't wavered a bit.

So....what exactly are these irrelevant players gonna do if the owners tell them to go F themselves, here's the deal....take it or leave it?

This notion that the players have leverage is full of hot air. They have none. Every last one of them won't be in the league in 20 years. Most won't be in the league in 10. Their clock is ticking. Their replacements are on the way. And we'll support the laundry, regardless of who fills it.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
If by going backwards in terms of compensation means not giving in and remaining firm and united, I agree....the players union hasn't wavered a bit.

So....what exactly are these irrelevant players gonna do if the owners tell them to go F themselves, here's the deal....take it or leave it?

This notion that the players have leverage is full of hot air. They have none. Every last one of them won't be in the league in 20 years. Most won't be in the league in 10. Their clock is ticking. Their replacements are on the way. And we'll support the laundry, regardless of who fills it.

The players weren't ever looking for more.. they were fine with the 50 percent status quo. So yes, they are fine with 48 percent. That was their concession. Both sides have made them. The owners however were borderline insane with their original demands and they've come back down to earth considerably since then.

Again, i don't think its going to matter much because i think we see a deal in the very near future, but credit both sides for making concessions and continuing to work together on this.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I agree both sides have made concessions. And both sides will have to make a few more to get it done. But to say the players haven't budged and the owners are the ones that are caving is laughable. It that was true, we wouldn't have had the talks break down this week with the players accusing the owners of going back to a worse offer a month ago.

The bottom line to me is the owners operate with all the leverage. The longer it goes, the easier it will be for them. They want to get a deal done now because they want a full season, they want that preseason revenue and they certainly don't want to alienate the fan base anymore than they already have. But they don't have a clock ticking on them like the players do. Jerry Jones can own the Cowboys for the rest of his life. Drew Brees only has so many passes left in his arm. He's the guy really taking a hit should the season be lost. Jerry will recover. Brees, and replace him with any other player as an example if you'd like, will never get that year of his career back.
 
Messages
2,310
Reaction score
0
I agree both sides have made concessions. And both sides will have to make a few more to get it done. But to say the players haven't budged and the owners are the ones that are caving is laughable. It that was true, we wouldn't have had the talks break down this week with the players accusing the owners of going back to a worse offer a month ago.

The bottom line to me is the owners operate with all the leverage. The longer it goes, the easier it will be for them. They want to get a deal done now because they want a full season, they want that preseason revenue and they certainly don't want to alienate the fan base anymore than they already have. But they don't have a clock ticking on them like the players do. Jerry Jones can own the Cowboys for the rest of his life. Drew Brees only has so many passes left in his arm. He's the guy really taking a hit should the season be lost. Jerry will recover. Brees, and replace him with any other player as an example if you'd like, will never get that year of his career back.

Both sides have budged.. that's what i meant when i said both sides have made concessions.

However, if you look at what the owners were originally demanding and what they players originally wanted.. and see where both are now, i'd say the owners gave in alot more, as they should have considering where they started.

We don't know what the actual deal is, but it was reported the owners were ready to agree to a 52-48 split, and then all of a sudden started demanding extras again. So we'll know when it all finally comes out, but i'd say a 52-48 split is pretty fair.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
I watched the CFL last Thursday and it was great !!!!!!!!!!!


I'll be fine without the NFL :whistle



:sneaky:

You'll be surprised how quick you adjust to no NFL football.

Not saying you won't miss it, but it's not the tragedy you envision.
 
Messages
2,064
Reaction score
0
Since Dallas hasn't been a serious contender for most of the last 15 years and likely wouldn't be this year either, I think it'll be easier to miss than if this were happening in the early/mid '90's. Right now I don't really care. I do think they'll play a majority of the season, but if they don't, whatever. I'll still have college football and then be able to do other things on Sunday afternoons and evenings than sit in front of a TV.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Definitely. Good point.

Even with the optimism I have with Garrett and Fat Rob, I still know we're shorthanded with the GM and probably will never contend until he's in the dirt. So a lost season during that tenure isn't all that big of a deal.

On the flip side, this is Parcells' core. The guy who fixed this team. There's only so many years until this group of players declines and we're back at the bottom of the league with one of the worst rosters. So maybe you might want to see some football this year while we have a chance.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
All I know is I didn't miss free agency. Didn't miss the rookie camp or the OTAs. I probably won't miss training camp. And I never would have thought that was possible a year ago.
 
Top Bottom