sbk92
2
- Messages
- 12,134
- Reaction score
- 6
More chatter on Browns' picks
UPDATE: Monday morning, ESPN AFC North blogger James Walker offered up his comments on whether the Cleveland Browns should use the No. 6 overall pick or try to trade down (find his take below).
---
Though Browns president Mike Holmgren seems open to the idea of trading down from the No. 6 overall draft pick, Terry Pluto of the Cleveland Plain Dealer believes that the team's draft strategy last season is a better harbinger of what to expect. Specifically, targeting an area of great need on defense.
Last year, the Browns stayed at No. 7 overall and took cornerback Joe Haden, followed by using a second-round pick on safety T.J. Ward. Haden was a productive player from a major collegiate program whose stock allegedly took a hit during the pre-draft process. Pluto writes that Browns general manager Tom Heckert stuck to his appraisals of Haden based on what the CB did in actual games, and that belief was rewarded with Haden's play in his rookie campaign.
In Pluto's estimation, the player that fits that archetype this draft season is Clemson defensive end Da'Quan Bowers. Like Haden before him, Bowers fits a position of need for the Browns (their cupboard of pass-rushers is relatively bare), was productive at a major college program and has seen his stock drop this pre-draft season. Bowers will go through a workout on Apr. 1, and teams will be able to directly confirm or deny the various reports that have emerged on his recovery from a knee injury.
So while Bowers -- or another pass-rusher -- is a strong possibility with the first pick, the ensuing question is whether the Browns will load up with another front seven defender in Round 2, or fill their other major need at wide receiver. This draft class is loaded with prospects at WR that carry a second-round grade, so it wouldn't be a shock to see the Browns target one at No. 37 overall.
- Tim Kavanagh
--
James Walker
It's better to stick with the pick
"This is a good year to be in the top 10. The Browns need impact players to help narrow the gap with Pittsburgh and Baltimore, and they should add one at No. 6."
UPDATE: Monday morning, ESPN AFC North blogger James Walker offered up his comments on whether the Cleveland Browns should use the No. 6 overall pick or try to trade down (find his take below).
---
Though Browns president Mike Holmgren seems open to the idea of trading down from the No. 6 overall draft pick, Terry Pluto of the Cleveland Plain Dealer believes that the team's draft strategy last season is a better harbinger of what to expect. Specifically, targeting an area of great need on defense.
Last year, the Browns stayed at No. 7 overall and took cornerback Joe Haden, followed by using a second-round pick on safety T.J. Ward. Haden was a productive player from a major collegiate program whose stock allegedly took a hit during the pre-draft process. Pluto writes that Browns general manager Tom Heckert stuck to his appraisals of Haden based on what the CB did in actual games, and that belief was rewarded with Haden's play in his rookie campaign.
In Pluto's estimation, the player that fits that archetype this draft season is Clemson defensive end Da'Quan Bowers. Like Haden before him, Bowers fits a position of need for the Browns (their cupboard of pass-rushers is relatively bare), was productive at a major college program and has seen his stock drop this pre-draft season. Bowers will go through a workout on Apr. 1, and teams will be able to directly confirm or deny the various reports that have emerged on his recovery from a knee injury.
So while Bowers -- or another pass-rusher -- is a strong possibility with the first pick, the ensuing question is whether the Browns will load up with another front seven defender in Round 2, or fill their other major need at wide receiver. This draft class is loaded with prospects at WR that carry a second-round grade, so it wouldn't be a shock to see the Browns target one at No. 37 overall.
- Tim Kavanagh
--
James Walker
It's better to stick with the pick
"This is a good year to be in the top 10. The Browns need impact players to help narrow the gap with Pittsburgh and Baltimore, and they should add one at No. 6."