10-6.
A healthy Sam Bradford and Chip's gimmicky 200 plays of hell offense has me worried. They key to beating them (just like with Oregon) is a dominant running game and keeping their offense off the field. I hope we gambled right with the RB situation.
It would be reality. It would represent what this team really is when it doesn't catch all the breaks, and figures with a healthier Romo we don't really need a dominating run game.9-7 would be a collosal failure.
Yeah you know what? I caught that Homer bug one too many times, and developed immunity. 20 years of stark mediocrity will do that.You...are....sooooooo....negative!
They don't develop that trust and that bond with the linemen. The one where, they pretty much know what he is going to do and he knows pretty much what they will do in certain situations. The back in the RBBC loses that ability to "see into the future" so to speak.I think 9-7 just because the running game will be drastically different. RBBC doesn't really work IMO. You need a guy that can be consistent for 25 or so carries a game. With RBBC there really isn't an opportunity for a guy to get going during a game.
Were loaded with talent. If we stay healthy and Garrett stays out of Linehans and Marinellis way, I see 11-5. With a 3-3 or 4-2 start.
10-6.
A healthy Sam Bradford and Chip's gimmicky 200 plays of hell offense has me worried. They key to beating them (just like with Oregon) is a dominant running game and keeping their offense off the field. I hope we gambled right with the RB situation.