Fuzzy Lumpkins is over there predicting 11-5.
I think if you lose him early enough and that causes the team to focus alot more on the run you might actually be better off.6-10 simply bc of Romo. Would be 2-3 win team otherwise.
They'll be staking out the day laborer lot at Lowe's looking for defensive help by game 3. Claiborne will be hurt just after warm ups of the first game. Murray average 11 touches per game, and Romo will get killed having to throw 50 times per game......
I will go with 10-6
My apologies, but I couldn't help but laugh at your conclusion, after giving us that winning formula. You sure you didn't mean to type "6-10" instead?
You DID give me a good laugh though, it's good to see that was intended.Hoping for a 10-6, you do know hope is a plan! But yeah, I'm thinking a Campo-like 5-11 is more realistic!
Yep, how little faith we have!Interesting read.
We'll win or stay in games the pundits don't think we should (Saints). We'll lose games we should win (came close twice already). We'll be blown out in at least one of our games (possibly in Seattle), possibly two (thought the Saints had a good chance of blowing us out, still have some good teams left on the schedule though).
Same as every year.
The question though becomes; will it again come down to the final week to see whether we go to the playoffs or not?
Idk, we might run out of steam after pushing for the playoffs these last 3 years.
Schizophrenic team leaves us with schizophrenic predictions.Or the Cowboys do the complete opposite of what I say and cruise comfortably into the playoffs.