Obama wants more Drug testing in the workplace

[Jon88]

Lol cythim is dumb as hell!

You just now figured that out?

 

[dbair1967]

Cy is actually a good guy, except when it comes to politics when he shows incredible levels of retardedness

Same thing with SP

 

[SixisBetter]

The first thing you should know about President Barack Obama’s 2012 Drug Control Strategy report is that it begins and ends with the declaration that the war on drugs is working and will continue apace.

lol

Not.Even.Close.

 

[Cythim]

First I've heard of business being restricted from testing.

Being ignorant of something does not mean it does not exist.

Since there is no comprehensive federal drug testing law, this leaves the field open to state regulation, and many states have enacted provisions imposing drug testing restrictions of various kinds. Some limit testing to "reasonable suspicion" or "probable cause" situations. Some explicitly authorize random testing under certain circumstances. Some impose restrictions on public sector employers but not on private companies. Many prescribe specific methods for handling of specimens and he use of test results. Only states that have drug testing laws are listen in the website.

http://www.testcountry.com/StateLaws/

 

[Cythim]

You just now figured that out?

Quit trolling me, troll.

 

[Iamtdg]

Being ignorant of something does not mean it does not exist.

Since there is no comprehensive federal drug testing law, this leaves the field open to state regulation, and many states have enacted provisions imposing drug testing restrictions of various kinds. Some limit testing to "reasonable suspicion" or "probable cause" situations. Some explicitly authorize random testing under certain circumstances. Some impose restrictions on public sector employers but not on private companies. Many prescribe specific methods for handling of specimens and he use of test results. Only states that have drug testing laws are listen in the website.

http://www.testcountry.com/StateLaws/

On that same page at the bottom:

Material on these pages (state drug testing laws and drug testing regulations) is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical or technical advice. This drug testing related information is not intended as substitute for obtaining legal advice from attorney, or a relevant medical technical or financial professional. TestCountry is not a law firm or a legal agency, therefore cannot guarantee the accuracy of this content. Drug testing laws are collected from legal and/or state sources, and it may or may not be valid by the time you are viewing it. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Global Business Support System Inc. DBA TestCountry

Yeah, last revision was 8 years ago.

Carry on with this nonsense.

 

[NoDak]

On that same page at the bottom:

Material on these pages (state drug testing laws and drug testing regulations) is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical or technical advice. This drug testing related information is not intended as substitute for obtaining legal advice from attorney, or a relevant medical technical or financial professional. TestCountry is not a law firm or a legal agency, therefore cannot guarantee the accuracy of this content. Drug testing laws are collected from legal and/or state sources, and it may or may not be valid by the time you are viewing it. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Global Business Support System Inc. DBA TestCountry

Yeah, last revision was 8 years ago.

Carry on with this nonsense.

1....2....3....4....5....6....7....8....9....10!

~waving arms~

HE'S OUT!

 

[Cythim]

On that same page at the bottom:

Material on these pages (state drug testing laws and drug testing regulations) is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical or technical advice. This drug testing related information is not intended as substitute for obtaining legal advice from attorney, or a relevant medical technical or financial professional. TestCountry is not a law firm or a legal agency, therefore cannot guarantee the accuracy of this content. Drug testing laws are collected from legal and/or state sources, and it may or may not be valid by the time you are viewing it. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Global Business Support System Inc. DBA TestCountry

Yeah, last revision was 8 years ago.

Carry on with this nonsense.

1....2....3....4....5....6....7....8....9....10!

~waving arms~

HE'S OUT!

You can play the fool all you like, but a legal disclaimer and an 8 year old statement do not disprove the existance of these restrictions. If you do not think that website is proof enough that restrictions on drug testing are in place then by all means continue to be ignorant to the facts. I'll do you a favor and link you directly to the laws in place from the state of Washington that restrict how a company can test their employees.

http://www.dop.wa.gov/sitecollectiondocuments/rules/wac 356 (archived rules)/wac35646.htm#125

 

[Iamtdg]

You can play the fool all you like, but a legal disclaimer and an 8 year old statement do not disprove the existance of these restrictions. If you do not think that website is proof enough that restrictions on drug testing are in place then by all means continue to be ignorant to the facts. I'll do you a favor and link you directly to the laws in place from the state of Washington that restrict how a company can test their employees.

http://www.dop.wa.gov/sitecollectiondocuments/rules/wac 356 (archived rules)/wac35646.htm#125

1) An agency may require a specific employee to submit to drug testing designed to identify the presence in the body of controlled substances referenced under chapter 69.50 RCW, other than drugs prescribed by a physician, if:

(c) The agency has a specific written policy authorizing such test, establishing procedures under which they may be conducted, and protecting the confidentiality of the results, provided the results may be disclosed in an action or proceeding challenging any disciplinary action arising from the incident which led to the test. The agency's proposed policy must be submitted to the affected exclusive bargaining representative or representatives and approved by the director of the department of personnel before implementation.

So, a company has to have it written into their policy to administer a drug test. You got me. I give. Uncle. Please stop.

 

[Cythim]

So, a company has to have it written into their policy to administer a drug test. You got me. I give. Uncle. Please stop.

You will need to become a better loser if you are going to constantly rebut easily proven facts.

 

[Iamtdg]

You will need to become a better loser if you are going to constantly rebut easily proven facts.

lol wut

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Lol cythim is dumb as hell!

yep

 

[NoDak]

1) An agency may require a specific employee to submit to drug testing designed to identify the presence in the body of controlled substances referenced under chapter 69.50 RCW, other than drugs prescribed by a physician, if:

(c) The agency has a specific written policy authorizing such test, establishing procedures under which they may be conducted, and protecting the confidentiality of the results, provided the results may be disclosed in an action or proceeding challenging any disciplinary action arising from the incident which led to the test. The agency's proposed policy must be submitted to the affected exclusive bargaining representative or representatives and approved by the director of the department of personnel before implementation.

So, a company has to have it written into their policy to administer a drug test. You got me. I give. Uncle. Please stop.

You already knocked the fool out. Now you gotta go step on his neck, too?

Cold blooded, man.

 

[Cythim]

I didn't realize I was talking to the three stooges. Let me put this all in language you can understand.

Why I oughta... You're gettin' in my hair! What's the idea? Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk! You nitwit! Soitenly! I didn't wanna say yes, but I couldn't say no. Oh, a wise guy, eh? Oh, you're an intelligent imbecile! Rrrowf! Rrrowf!

 

[Iamtdg]

Wow.

 

[Iamtdg]

And, I mean that.

 

[Cythim]

Wow.

And, I mean that.

I'm sorry, was that still over your head? I can't go any lower than the three stooges, sorry!

 

[Iamtdg]

I'm sorry, was that still over your head? I can't go any lower than the three stooges, sorry!

Lies. I have a distinct feeling you have gone much lower in your days.

 

[Cythim]

Lies. I have a distinct feeling you have gone much lower in your days.

I've tried but Bob Sacamano falls well below my range.

 

[Iamtdg]

I've tried but Bob Sacamano falls well below my range.

Deflection.

Well played.