Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Forgive me for my tardiness in addressing this issue, but I figure if Jason Garrett can wait nearly five months to come clean, a span of several days doesn’t seem too long.

If perception doesn’t matter to him, why didn’t Garrett just share the NFL’s worst-kept secret much earlier in the offseason?

It took Jerry Jones spilling enough beans for reporters to feed to Bill Callahan – and then a week of Garrett looking desperately defiant by refusing to address the issue in a head-on manner – before the man with the title of Dallas Cowboys head coach admitted that he’d no longer be calling the offensive plays. It was probably the biggest PR gaffe in Garrett’s career, although refusing to own up to the Arizona clock-management crisis is pretty tough to beat.

It sure looked from my view on vacation like a cut-off-at-the-knees coach attempting to cling to whatever shred of authority that he could grab.

Oh, wait, we’re supposed to believe that the ham-fisted, tight-lipped way that Garrett handled the transfer of play-calling responsibilities was about a competitive edge, right? That’s the truth about why Garrett lied as late as a few weeks ago, when he insisted that no decision has been made despite Callahan calling plays throughout the OTA practices.

Riiiiight. Gee whiz, Garrett sure kept those Giants off guard. Tom Coughlin and Co. would have really been in trouble if they only had a month to prepare for Callahan as a play caller, but Jerry had to go and screw that up, huh?

Can anyone explain the competitive advantage that Garrett was maintaining by consistently downplaying Tony Romo’s increased role in the game-planning until last week? How did the Cowboys benefit by Garrett insisting that the “Peyton Manning-type” influence Jerry was so giddy about for Romo was really just the same as every quarterback situation he’d been around? (Just like Joey Harrington when Garrett was the Dolphins’ QBs coach!!!)

There’s a pretty simple trend: Garrett’s dishonesty increases as his authority decreases.

The truth is all these changes could save Garrett’s job. A strong argument can be made that every staff adjustment the Cowboys made this season, including giving Romo an unofficial assistant offensive coordinator title, improve their chances of making the playoffs for the first time since 2009. But the fact that Garrett felt the need to fib speaks to the heat of his seat and discomfort of the puppet strings that Jerry has attempted to attach this offseason.

To be clear, the media has no right to be mad about the white lies of a prominent sports figure. It’s part of the deal that head coaches, owners, players, etc. pick and choose when the truth serves their purposes. As Jerry often says, usually with a wink, “Just because I say it doesn’t make it so.”

It’s our job to put their words to the smell test, and the fact that Garrett’s spin has reeked worse than the skunks that roam Valley Ranch made maintaining the spin for months so silly.

This could have been handled at the Senior Bowl, when Jerry first strongly hinted that Garrett would be shifting into the walk-around head coach role that the owner had long despised but Jimmy Johnson had always advised for Garrett. The story would have been drowned out by Super Bowl hype and old news by the time OTAs rolled around.

Perhaps Garrett really hoped he could win that power struggle and continue to call plays, as he indicated was the plan the day after the Cowboys’ second straight 8-8 season ended. But he knew the score when he addressed the media in mid-February after the coaching staff had been reconstructed.

Garrett executed his game plan that night: Stressing the tight ties with the Jerry-hired former Tampa Bay assistants, supposedly established during a 5-11 season when he was on and off the Buccaneers’ roster, and dancing around the play-calling issue. It was a lot like most of Garrett’s 2012 game plans, putting him in a hole he had to dig out of.

So the dance continued and the drama was dragged out, with Garrett determined to publicly acknowledge the obvious on his own terms and repeatedly refusing opportunities to get it over with.

In some ways, you can respect Garrett’s stubbornness. Too bad for him that Jerry obviously doesn’t. And that's no secret.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Maybe Jason didn't make an official announcement because, well, what would the point of that be?

I kind of like the idea of only disseminating information when its for the greater good of the team. And while theres really no negative to announcing the playcaller, theres really no positive either.

This is only really a story because the media drove the 'whos the playcaller' angle all off season and because Jerry ran his mouth like a ******.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Then why did Jason say he thought things would stay the way they were right after the season? Along with pointing out how good his offense had been and grouping himself with Payton and McCarthy as great HC/playcallers, BTW.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Because when asked a question, you can't just say "no comment."

You have to give an answer.

I don't know. I dont' know if my thinking is right. Hell, it's probably not. But again, I don't see the benefit really in telling the media anything. I know as fans we want info. But it really does the team no good to be an open book.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
He could have just said something like, "We don't know yet. There may be changes, there may not be. We'll look at everything to try to improve."

Instead, he went out of his way to prop himself and the job he'd done.

No, there probably is no benefit to telling the media anything. But it's unrealistic to try to deny them everything, especially in this day and age. Every other team faces the same thing, so there's no competitive disadvantage.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
When Popovich or Bellichick or Parcells treat the media with the disdain they deserve (not because they are awful but because they are an unnecessary distraction to the team) and withold info (many times for no reason at all, just because they can) it's applauded.

When Jerry Jones tells the media every single goddam thing that's on his mind, because he has mouth diarrhea, it's derided.

It doesn't become any less of a good idea to treat the media how they deserve to be treated because you don't have skins on the wall.

Criticism loses any punch when it becomes incessant.
 

bkeavs

UDFA
Messages
2,189
Reaction score
0
When Popovich or Bellichick or Parcells treat the media with the disdain they deserve (not because they are awful but because they are an unnecessary distraction to the team) and withold info (many times for no reason at all, just because they can) it's applauded.

When Jerry Jones tells the media every single goddam thing that's on his mind, because he has mouth diarrhea, it's derided.

It doesn't become any less of a good idea to treat the media how they deserve to be treated because you don't have skins on the wall.

Criticism loses any punch when it becomes incessant.

SP Is that you old friend???
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Okay, SP, then why didn't Garrett say the day after the season last year that he didn't want to reveal that? Why did it suddenly change?

And I'm not going for punch. I know most people like Garrett and I'm in the minority who don't. That's ok.

And I think Poppavich's media schtick is over the top, really, to the point that he just comes off as a total jerk. And I like the guy otherwise -- he's a great, great coach.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
I'm not familiar with what you're talking about.

I don't like Garrett either. I just think we should criticize him on things that actually deserve criticism instead of this shit from McMahon. IDGAF what he tells or doesn't tell the media.

It's obvious Garrett couldn't handle his gameday duties so a change was made that needed to be made. I'm pretty happy about that. I think if the media wants to hammer the guy they should come up with some examples over the years of gameday blunders where it was obvious Garrett couldn't do things that a walkaround HC should be doing (ass-blasting the officials over a blown call) because he had to run back and call another terrible play - then ask him why it took so long to come to his senses or something.

All of this crap just sounds like teenage girl shit complaints from the media. waaaaaaaahhhhhhh Garrett doesn't bare his soul to us. Garrett told them what he wanted when he wanted to. McMahon seems almost embarassed at the pathetic crying of the media so he tries to say "we aint even mad" while blaming Garrett for how mad they got that he didn't give them what they wanted when they wanted it.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Well I don't really disagree with you there. A lot of this is soap opera type stuff that won't mean anything as soon as camp starts. But that's sort of the nature of having 20 reporters with a 24 hour news cycle covering a team in the offseason.
 

JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
Reading anything by McMahon is a waste of time. Drama queen. Does anyone really care that much about who is calling the plays? There are much more important issues confronting this team.
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,177
Reaction score
2,369
I'd agree with sp here if Garrett was good at lying to the media.

The real scandal is that some fans (read: homers) don't mind being lied to. In fact, they openly welcome it if they think (wrongly) that it will somehow help the team. They're too stupid to realize that the eeeevil media are their emissaries.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
The real scandal is that some fans (read: homers) don't mind being lied to. In fact, they openly welcome it if they think (wrongly) that it will somehow help the team. They're too stupid to realize that the eeeevil media are their emissaries.

It's not in Garrett's nature to be conspiratorial. He's a nerdy bookworm.
 

junk

UDFA
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
Reading anything by McMahon is a waste of time. Drama queen. Does anyone really care that much about who is calling the plays? There are much more important issues confronting this team.

Oh I care. Garrett is average, at best, as an OC. He doesn't seem to have much feel for it. Too many times the team dug themselves in a hole to start games.

Let Garrett focus on being a team manager and take play calling off his plate. It should help
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,177
Reaction score
2,369
You don't have to be conspiratorial to be a liar. He lied about not being bothered when Jerry gave him instructions on the field in the middle of a game a few years ago (how could he not?), and he lied about not being bothered about the play-calling demotion. Either tell the truth or say "no comment." Don't lie.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
Oh I care. Garrett is average, at best, as an OC. He doesn't seem to have much feel for it. Too many times the team dug themselves in a hole to start games.

Let Garrett focus on being a team manager and take play calling off his plate. It should help

For such a nerblin he sure didnt seem too prepared for in game scenarios. He totally frew-balled it in clock management situations, down and distance monitoring, max FG range of his kicker etc.


It's like wtf are they paying him for
 
Top Bottom