Bob Sacamano
All-Pro
- Messages
- 26,436
- Reaction score
- 3
Prescott is light years ahead of any QB we've had not named Romo and Aikman.
You can just tell. He has 'it'. Just like Romo proved to have.
- Thread starter Oldfestus408
- Start date
Prescott is light years ahead of any QB we've had not named Romo and Aikman.
You can just tell. He has 'it'. Just like Romo proved to have.
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 11
I still see that there is another possibility to the the Dak success theory.
It think the embarrassment was so bad last year, completely indicting a coaching staff who was supposed to be able to produce something from Weeden, Cassel and Moore; a coaching staff who had the same offensive line as the record breaking 2014 and added MCFadden (whether you like him or not, he was not some mentally tasharded Undrafted Hambrick); a coaching staff whose Pro BowlTE, uncoverable slot WR and "#2" WR were still Available to play.
Watch Dak's first game, it doesn't even matter that the Rams were playing vanilla defense, the plays themselves were different. More lateral movement. More immediate decisions on one open player, not a big extended time scan of the field until someone looked open. I think the playbook is changed for Dak and given that his supporting cast is so strong, he doesn't need to be messianic, he just need to follow a play. I know the Linehan offense is much different from the Garrett offense and what I saw in the first preseason game was not "wait for the defense", it was "throw to the player that the play was designed to target" which is a lot like Martz. Kurt Warner and Martz worked well (along with having elite speed at WR) because Martz wanted players open immediately (he called it "mismatches").
I think Dak's success might end up being more about making things simple for him and him having such a powerful supporting cast - except at #2WR.
- Messages
- 4,952
- Reaction score
- 0
Tough situation because Dak would have been the back up. They went after Foles earlier in the offseason and it didn't pan out. Not much was left, but I'm definitely tired of having to rely on guys like Weeden and Sanchez.
The problem, as always, is that unless a QB has natural talent and ability, they are going to be useless here under Garrett and Wade's "coaching". Mediocre players are not coached up when you have a clownass running the operations.
The problem, as always, is that unless a QB has natural talent and ability, they are going to be useless here under Garrett and Wade's "coaching". Mediocre players are not coached up when you have a clownass running the operations.
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,863
- Reaction score
- 6,132
There ya go Mid, I fixed your quote for you
yimyammer
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,971
- Reaction score
- 3,758
I wonder how much we'd know about Dak right now if the Boise st QB hadn't broke his leg.
I'm unconvinced that anything other than the desperation of circumstance would have given Dak the reps
Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,863
- Reaction score
- 6,132
I agree
Not that I wish anyone to get injured but I am glad that we got to see what Dak can do already. Otherwise he may have ended up another unproven, undeveloped, unused commodity that wastes away on the sidelines like Romo's career under Garrett
I hope Dak pans out so we can all get past this Romo's gonna win us a Super Bowl bullshit
Can he? Sure, is his body capable of lasting the season to allow it to happen? No way in hell
Not that I wish anyone to get injured but I am glad that we got to see what Dak can do already. Otherwise he may have ended up another unproven, undeveloped, unused commodity that wastes away on the sidelines like Romo's career under Garrett
I hope Dak pans out so we can all get past this Romo's gonna win us a Super Bowl bullshit
Can he? Sure, is his body capable of lasting the season to allow it to happen? No way in hell
- Messages
- 57,895
- Reaction score
- 8,668
Don't have a big problem with it. He's won games, QB'd teams to the playoffs and actually been in championship games.
We got him on a 1yr deal for fairly cheap and it didn't cost us any draft picks, unlike Minnesota did trading a 1st and 4th for a #1 overall pick bust who's fragile and the picture of mediocrity even when he is on the field.
We got him on a 1yr deal for fairly cheap and it didn't cost us any draft picks, unlike Minnesota did trading a 1st and 4th for a #1 overall pick bust who's fragile and the picture of mediocrity even when he is on the field.
yimyammer
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 9,971
- Reaction score
- 3,758
Speaking of the Broncos, did anyone watch the special on NFL Network about their Super Bowl win?
Pretty aggravating to see that Denver has been to the Super Bowl 4 times (& won 3) since the Cowboys last went to a Super Bowl.
Even more aggravating to see after they lost the Super Bowl 2 years ago, they fired their coach and managed to get back and win it all in two years with a broken down QB and utilizing a back up QB to win games while Peyton was out. Not to mention doing so with D Ware and cast off Cowboy coaches Wade Phillps and DiCamilis
Yet my buddy constantly drones on how they had their core and the Cowboys have had to rebuild theirs over the last 5 years, last year was just unlucky.
Makes me want to punch a baby, Im sick of the fucking excuses
- Messages
- 57,895
- Reaction score
- 8,668
He wouldn't have gotten teams to championship games if he hadn't won some playoff games first genius.
- Messages
- 10,636
- Reaction score
- 0
How do I like this
NoMoRedJ
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,477
- Reaction score
- 56
Only because he hasnt had a red headed genius for a coach.
TheZoneSucks
UDFA
- Messages
- 2,278
- Reaction score
- 53
Yep. The Butt-fumbler has a 4-2 record to Romo's 2-4. Sanchez even has a higher QB rating in the playoffs than Romo does.
theoneandonly
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 5,269
- Reaction score
- 552
They dont have a wild catter moon lighting as GM.