- Messages
- 58,588
- Reaction score
- 9,065
He also said Hillary Clinton is a criminal.
I bet that short circuits most of your brains.
Not really. Its true. Everyone knows it.
But he'll still vote for her!
He also said Hillary Clinton is a criminal.
I bet that short circuits most of your brains.
Yeah he said Hillary is a criminal and Trump is a liar. But I betcha a dolla he still pulls the (D) lever straight across come election day.
Yeah he said Hillary is a criminal and Trump is a liar. But I betcha a dolla he still pulls the (D) lever straight across come election day.
Not really. Its true. Everyone knows it.
But he'll still vote for her!
I knew it would short circuit your brains. All of you claiming you know who he's voting for.Right next to Pep pulling that same lever
I knew it would short circuit your brains. All of you claiming you know who he's voting for.
I knew it would short circuit your brains. All of you claiming you know who he's voting for.
I don't know how many of them would vote for what david. See, I don't make assumptions about people because of one thing they do, or because of what they look like.How many BLM dickwads would vote for anything other than whomever the most liberal dipshit is?
There's only one choice for them. Even someone with your smallish political acumen should be able to figure that one out.
Yawn. Anyone who doesn't assume the same things you assume is a liberal hack. Got it. Dumbass.^ Sounds like a liberal hack now.
As usual.
"writing's on the wall" = I'm just gonna wildly speculate here, and ignore what he said about Hillary because that doesn't fit my narrative.Only one party has chosen (repeatedly) to meet with BLM. Only one party "consulted" with them on criminal policies. Their people only show up to rally for one particular group of people. Writings on the wall for all to see there hayseed, except for you.
When someone in government tries to make Kaepernick stand for the anthem, you will hear me howling immediately. The 1st Amendment protects our speech from GOVERNMENT action, not private action.I find it odd that people who demand the 2nd Amendment to be followed to the letter of the law and no one better infringe upon your Constitutional rights to bear arms, don't seem to have the same respect for Kaepernick's 1st Amendment rights.
Now, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences from your free speech. Kaepernick could very well be cut and out of football for his comments. He still gets to protest.
When someone in government tries to make Kaepernick stand for the anthem, you will hear me howling immediately. The 1st Amendment protects our speech from GOVERNMENT action, not private action.
There is no right to speech in the constitution or in this country, that shields us from the consequences of our speech. More speech is a consequence of speech. Any private citizen who is responding to Kaepernick is NOT violating his rights in any way. Your comparison is completely invalid.
The constitution protects us from government action only. There is nothing in it whatsoever that protects us from each other. A surprising amount of people don't know that.
Kaepernick can open his mouth and say anything he wants. We have the same right, to reply. This does not in any way violate any right he has.
The fucking sissy isn't a downtrodden picked on victim - he is recipient of the consequences of his actions and his words.
I haven't seen that anywhere.I get what you are saying but the general problem is that people are feeling that Kaepernick should not be allowed to not stand for the national anthem.
I find it odd that people who demand the 2nd Amendment to be followed to the letter of the law and no one better infringe upon your Constitutional rights to bear arms, don't seem to have the same respect for Kaepernick's 1st Amendment rights.
.Most of you guys know me. I'm a veteran and yes, I'm a Democrat
One of the reasons I felt honored to serve this country is that this country allows its citizens the right to protest, stand up for yourself, and express your opinions. Now, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences from your free speech. Kaepernick could very well be cut and out of football for his comments. He still gets to protest.
no racist undertones here...No asswipe, I called you a liberal hack because you played the "racism" card, which is what those folks do over and over again even if there is zero evidence for it. I made my statement on Kapernicks voting based on the fact that he is engaged to a BLM idiot and he himself preaches that garbage now. Those people have been to the Obama WH numerous times, and in fact the Clinton Campaign "consulted" with BLM on how criminal policy should be laid out. They're doing that for a reason asshat.
Again, forest for the trees stuff here dude.