I was going to ask the same thing.
What tools are those?
Personally, I like a head coach who can always keep his emotions in check, David Shaw for example does this well. Players are going 100 miles an hour and emotionally are all over the place. The cool, calming presence of the head coach goes a long way on a football team. I think the optimism is good as well it just has to actually mean something. In Dallas, I can't tell if Garrett is just full of it or just hamstrung by Jerry. He definitely talks a good game.
None of what you listed makes a good head coach or a good football coach or anything producing competitive football anything. What you listed is the call screener for a human resource department. I think the opposite of what you said it true. I think he cannot lead, cannot motivate, cannot teach, cannot construct, design, or innovate; he has one mode of operating anything and he desperately clings to that one mode.
An effective head coach, if nothing else, manufactures change. Jason is consistenty the same and knows/does nothing more.
I think sadly that he has been in a position that he is not capable of doing, staring with OC in 2007.
He is a glorified QB coach who is in over his head with how to get the most out of his players and his team with the talent and time he has. Think about it: his whole game and clock management method boils down to Romo's discretion. That's really the functionality of a QB coach, not a head coach.