Deprecated: League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem::__construct(): Implicitly marking parameter $emitter as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 30
Deprecated: League\Flysystem\EventableFilesystem\EventableFilesystem::get(): Implicitly marking parameter $handler as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 98
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
Deprecated: Use of "parent" in callables is deprecated in /usr/www/dcu/public_html/src/vendor/league/flysystem-eventable-filesystem/src/EventableFilesystem.php on line 431
As for me, I was banned by hostile but my hate for the guy formed long before I posted at teh zone, basically because I found it outrageous the manner in which you people allowed him to act. I mean you not only tolerated him, you deified him, for acting like an idiot and making up obvious lies.
'Shared correspondence' with is not as concise as 'met.' You really need to let that angst go. Coronaries do not look fun. You very obviously get strong emotional responses from interchanges on the interwebs; I fail to see how you can take this tact.
Just curious, but why do you go over there and make a post that makes it sound like the entire board is 'taking you to task' over being his friend. When in reality it was only you and Bob arguing about it. Little added drama to spice things up a bit?
And btw, you've been a longstanding member over there. If you can't see how he is a lying attention whore, I honestly don't know what to say.
Just curious, but why do you go over there and make a post that makes it sound like the entire board is 'taking you to task' over being his friend. When in reality it was only you and Bob arguing about it. Little added drama to spice things up a bit?
And btw, you've been a longstanding member over there. If you can't see how he is a lying attention whore, I honestly don't know what to say.
You just told me I should be able to see he's a lying attention whore. Superpunk corrected me with much of the same as had jeebus. In response to me saying I am friends with him pretty much each one of you has told me that I should be able to see that hes an asshole.
'Shared correspondence' with is not as concise as 'met.' You really need to let that angst go. Coronaries do not look fun. You very obviously get strong emotional responses from interchanges on the interwebs; I fail to see how you can take this tact.
But seriously, that guess was more about hostile than yOu. I will be shocked if you don get a pm to discuss your school yard tale carrying. (admittedly, roasting hostile us not the most mature act I have been a part of, but it is for the good of the Internet).
Just curious, but why do you go over there and make a post that makes it sound like the entire board is 'taking you to task' over being his friend. When in reality it was only you and Bob arguing about it. Little added drama to spice things up a bit?
And btw, you've been a longstanding member over there. If you can't see how he is a lying attention whore, I honestly don't know what to say.
Well, I have been 'sharing correspondence' with you since what? about 2005? and I can say that we really do not like each other at all. It's not a very hard concept. As much anger as you display I think 'friend' is much more innocuous.
But seriously, that guess was more about hostile than yOu. I will be shocked if you don get a pm to discuss your school yard tale carrying. (admittedly, roasting hostile us not the most mature act I have been a part of, but it is for the good of the Internet).
Well, I have been 'sharing correspondence' with you since what? about 2005? and I can say that we really do not like each other at all. It's not a very hard concept. As much anger as you display I think 'friend' is much more innocuous.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. We also collect user agent strings for troubleshooting, compatibility and security purposes.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and user agent data.