- Messages
- 10,304
- Reaction score
- 6,452
another year of sidelines tantrums and a WR-QB combo that can't quite connect. are you excited yet?
Dallas new wr coach will coach him up
another year of sidelines tantrums and a WR-QB combo that can't quite connect. are you excited yet?
You post "we're doomed" and then "we're fucked" like it's some kind of fucking news to you, or somehow you'd thought we had turned a corner or some shit and are only just now waking up and smelling the 21 year-old coffee. And we're neither doomed or fucked, we're just the same as we were the day after Jimmy parted ways with us. Married to mediocrity.Oh I have been mad about it for the last two decades. just felt like posting that since this is a cowboys forum. I mean cmon dooms really ??
No I was just venting that's all. You read way to much into it .You post "we're doomed" and then "we're fucked" like it's some kind of fucking news to you, or somehow you'd thought we had turned a corner or some shit and are only just now waking up and smelling the 21 year-old coffee. And we're neither doomed or fucked, we're just the same as we were the day after Jimmy parted ways with us. Married to mediocrity.
I actually saw on Twitter the WRs who have “flourished” with that WR coach. The bottom line is that Sanjay guy is just a Coryell-lineage coach who is going to quietly cash a paycheck and do nothing. The part that is missing from any passing game hire is that the Garrett Family Fancy themselves WR and TE experts. And the entirety of the JG offensive scheme revolves around WR routes. If you notice the TE and RB receiving routes are binary: one short route and one seam or distance route. How many times has the passing game basic scheme changed with Garrett since 07? None. How many times has the running scheme changed? Offhand: Sparano, Houck/Garrett, Callahan, and Pollack/ Linehan. The point is Garrett has no real opinion or interest in the running game. Even if he has the leagues leading rusher, he will take him off the field “to create mismatches in the passing game”.
I could see Dallas signing some senseless CFL WRs before the draft so that Jason will not have to change his lineup. Jason is primarily self-preserving: I’ve never seen a coach spend so much time using rhetoric to explain why his team is losing and it has nothing to do with him. But his leg is also smart enough to know that as soon as there is drastic WR passing game change and Dallas starts winning the question will be: why wasn’t this done earlier? I am convinced the Garrett’s pushed for TWilly and keep him on the team (Beasley was not the Garrett’s and despite him outplaying TWilly, they would reduce or eliminate Beasley as he represents success that is lacking in the Garrett idea of what the offense should be: short passes). TWilly single-handedly lost the GB game last year (pun intended) and nobody said a word.
My guess is that if Dallas does draft in either of the first 2 rounds, the Jones are beginning to see that Jason is still clueless and the keys to the Ferrari are being taken away from Garrett and distributed to a collective to solve the offense.
Think about it. Why wasn’t Linehan fired? It would come out that he was not really coordinating nor exclusively directing the offense. Another OC would come in, hired by Jerry just to find that the passing game would be the same. Linehan was not the issue even though the entire argument was playcalling, predictability and bland sameness. That’s because it was not Linehan.
You can literally bank on it.
How have they shown they are willing to part ways? Did I miss something?
I think his opinion of it is that it's a necessary evil, something you only really NEED to do when it's 4th and short. It's not something he believes is essential to winning football.The point is Garrett has no real opinion or interest in the running game. Even if he has the leagues leading rusher, he will take him off the field “to create mismatches in the passing game”.
Oh, hey guys look! It's another of those "well, who ya gonna git" morons that thinks there is nobody else on planet earth that can come in here and equal Dez's pedestrian numbers for a lot less money.
Stop being a pussy when it comes to change. Funny how the Patriots never have this problem.
This is what i was saying when they were talking about getting married to him, and the Dez fanbois here pilloried me. All I can say is:But our dumbo GM signed him to a long term deal instead of tagging him. So live with it one more year then you can cut him and it will not be so much dead money and you at least will get 6-12 TDs next year just on playground pitch and catch. That's what Dez is what Parcells called a street ball player. They do not last once injuries and age hit. You do not pay players like that long term deals.
From purely a cap standpoint this is correct. Cutting him now would be cap suicide, next year before June 1 would be the time to part ways.It makes no sense not to give Dez one more year.
Shit, he might just beast the hell out of it next year to get another big deal from some sucker GM on some other team.
Well Dez when he is on he can be great. But when he is not on, he does drop a lot more passes than he cares to admit or that we care to see.
Yeah isn't this what a WR coach is supposed to be doing with WR's? Teaching them to improve route running and stuff?
What's our guys been doing all these years?
The flip side is it took the threat of dumping Dez for him to seek out help in the area.