No, i think its right where you're at.
Honestly, you remind me of the ADD kid in elementary school who was told to sit in the back corner of class and as the teacher would go over things, say dinosaures, you'd yell out "Why did they name the tyrannosaurus, Rex?"
Then when the teacher told you to quiet down, you'd lean to the closest kid to you and go, "Hey look i drew a penis!"
At some point i'd think you could maybe advance your understanding past a literal interpretation of everything word by word, and be able to understand the scope of an argument to the point where when i say something like "When plays broke down and in clutch situations, Tony would go to Crayton alot because they had a good understanding of what each other would do and Tony knew where Crayton would be because he ran good routes and could read a defense well", you don't latch on to one phrase of that entire argument and miss the entire point i was making in the first place.
Just a thought.. also, maybe if admins weren't purposely derailing threads off topic this place would have more than 7 or 8 consistent posters. JMO. Carry on..