- Messages
- 57,933
- Reaction score
- 8,708
We'll just have to agree to disagree. I think that in this case, the staff has evaluated Sensabaugh poorly and made a bad decision to extend him. No one was going to run out and sign him on March 1st. All teams make mistakes evaluating which players to re-sign or not to re-sign, so I'm not crucifying them. You are right that this deal does not cripple us financially but I hate the idea of rewarding medicority, especially when there was zero pressure to do so.
Its your opinion he is mediocre though, it might not be an opinion the staff agrees with you on.
I dont love the player either and feel we could do better, but keeping him keeps options open. We have alot of other areas of bigger need IMO, and letting him go just increases the need there potentially at the expense of some far more important areas.