IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups

[superpunk]

I'm trollie?

no you're just not witty. you're good at a lot of things but thats not one of them. still you're like one of my top 10 favorite posters

 

[superpunk]

Please also make note I only reply to relevant questions.

Keep dancing.

You either don't know the answers, or you know how stupid answering the questions makes this whole thing - and everyone who actually got upset about it - look.

The IRS's job is to prevent this sort of thing. Looking for political buzzwords is a good idea. AT WORST they went in heavy on tea party themed titles. Then what happened? What was the outrageous backlash from this egregious profiling. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE explain exactly what happened once the IRS focused on one of these groups and explain how awful it must have been for them.

 

[superpunk]

after all you fuckwads posted article after article in outrage, even some dumbass shit about who's going to jail over this. You should be able to pretty easily explain by now what jailable offenses were committed here in your own words.

****feverishly searching breitbart**********

 

[ScipioCowboy]

The questions are irrelevant because they have no bearing on the admission that the IRS singled out conservative and libertarian groups.

That's all that matters here.

 

[cmd34]

no you're just not witty. you're good at a lot of things but thats not one of them. still you're like one of my top 10 favorite posters

YES!

 

[superpunk]

The questions are irrelevant because they have no bearing on the admission that the IRS singled out conservative and libertarian groups.

That's all that matters here.

lmao you can't do it. keep dancing.

maybe this lowest common denominator analysis is all I can expect from you. I took you for a deeper thinker than that.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Much like all the questions you've asked here, the depth of my thought process is irrelevant to whether or not the IRS singled out conservative and libertarian groups. That's the issue here.

 

[superpunk]

Much like all the questions you've asked here, the depth of my thought process is irrelevant to whether or not the IRS singled out conservative and libertarian groups. That's the issue here.

And I'm asking you to explain why that is a big deal.

I agree, they should be looking at all the groups fairly. But as I pointed out earlier, they are swamped with almost double the applications now after citizens united. This whole thing (giving these entities tax exempt status) is a huge fuck up on the part of our government. The IRS has to try and enforce it somehow, they can't just approve this shit willy nilly. So in an effort to weed out political groups who are exempt from applying, they factored in some politically charged words. It's wrong that they slanted heavily towards conservative groups. But at least acknowledge that they're in a tough spot with their workload here.

And then explain the rest. These people, in response to the IRS "unfairly singling them out" (the 75 conservative groups along with what 475 other groups iirc????) were asked to do what exactly? Do you know?

Ultimately there was absolutely no harm done here. Noone was denied anything. They were asked to fill out a fucking questionairre.

And these melvins want people jailed. Give me a fucking break.

 

[JBond]

to do what? fill out a long questionairre?

lies, lies, sweet little lies.

So your defense of a corrupt IRS is to lie your ass off. Good luck with that. spunk we all know the truth. Your BS distractions that have nothing to do with the topic at hand will not help you win a debate where the IRS says they fucked up and the head resigned.

Go take your pill so you can focus. This is about the systematic denial of first amendments right to influence the outcome of an election. They approved trash like Obama's brother in a month, yet demanded lists of high school students that a conservative teacher was mentoring.

Why do you want to systematically deny rights to people? It is because you are a bigot. If a bunch of homosexuals were denied the ability to partake in the political process you would be shitting a brick, but because it happened to people you hate your are all good with it. You are a complete fucking phony and your hate rules you. Your are pure 100% bullshit. Nothing you say has any meaning. You have effectively undermined nearly every argument you have ever made. You care about nothing other than yourself and your gloriously corrupt leader.

What a sad little boy you are. I actually feel a little pity for you. Not enough that I would pee on you if you were on fire, but a little.

 

[iceberg]

And I'm asking you to explain why that is a big deal.

I agree, they should be looking at all the groups fairly. But as I pointed out earlier, they are swamped with almost double the applications now after citizens united. This whole thing (giving these entities tax exempt status) is a huge fuck up on the part of our government. The IRS has to try and enforce it somehow, they can't just approve this shit willy nilly. So in an effort to weed out political groups who are exempt from applying, they factored in some politically charged words. It's wrong that they slanted heavily towards conservative groups. But at least acknowledge that they're in a tough spot with their workload here.

And then explain the rest. These people, in response to the IRS "unfairly singling them out" (the 75 conservative groups along with what 475 other groups iirc????) were asked to do what exactly? Do you know?

Ultimately there was absolutely no harm done here. Noone was denied anything. They were asked to fill out a fucking questionairre.

And these melvins want people jailed. Give me a fucking break.

you'd be wah'ing the night away if they singled out gays, dude.

admit it.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

You can't see why the IRS playing political favorites isn't a big deal?

Ultimately, the Watergate break in didn't do any damage to the Democrats. That didn't absolve Nixon from culpability.

 

[JBond]

You can't see why the IRS playing political favorites isn't a big deal?

No, he can see it but does not care because his side wasn't targeted. That is how he rolls. All about self.

 

[MetalHead]

lmao you can't do it. keep dancing.

maybe this lowest common denominator analysis is all I can expect from you. I took you for a deeper thinker than that.

In this matter, deep thinking is not required if you are a man of sound character.
The facts are clear cut and they(IRS) have admitted their wrongdoing.
You are trolling...again.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

The man who exposed Watergate, Bob Woodward, has already written an unflattering book on Obama, and he's not as popular as he once was.

 

[iceberg]

The man who exposed Watergate, Bob Woodward, has already written an unflattering book on Obama, and he's not as popular as he once was.

obama or bob?

 

[MetalHead]

Superpunk is a leftist.
A leftist is a political prostitute.
The only purpose he serves is the role of a useful idiot.
He is working on his own demise by aiding and justifying the actions of those who use him and will later dispose of him when the beautiful Utopia he was promised fails to materialize.But he can't see it.
Because he is a leftist.
Don't bother with leftists.
They are contaminated.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

obama or bob?

Bob.

 

[superpunk]

You can't see why the IRS playing political favorites isn't a big deal?

Ultimately, the Watergate break in didn't do any damage to the Democrats. That didn't absolve Nixon from culpability.

feel free to explain exactly why its a big deal.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Maybe after I stop laughing...

 

[MetalHead]

feel free to explain exactly why its a big deal.

Wow...how can you be so "educated" and fail to see the obvious?

Oh,yeah...you are a useful idiot.

That's how.