Forget Sparano

[peplaw06]

What is so damn hard to understand about this Bob? No one said he's the best ever. Try to exercise those brain cells for once in your life.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Noone said he has no business running an NFL offense either. What's so hard to understand about this??? Try not being a damn homer for once in your life.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I agree with most of this... However, I will say, the easiest way to judge an offense is by yardage output. It's a universal way to compare them across the league.

Scoring averages can be impacted heavily by the type of defense you have. And red zone efficiency, while an important stat for scoring averages, is just one part of the offense.

Naw, it's just convenient because our scoring offense leaves much to be desired.

It's a universal homer tactic.

 

[peplaw06]

Noone said he has no business running an NFL offense either. What's so hard to understand about this??? Try not being a damn homer for once in your life.

Actually, Wahoos (y'know the guy I originally responded to) said Garrett has done nothing to show he's capable of being a legit OC in this league, and has since said it was an overstatement. The only person who can't figure that shit out is you.

Naw, it's just convenient because our scoring offense leaves much to be desired.

It's a universal homer tactic.

Naw, you just don't understand shit about football cause you're a fucking moron.

It's a universal Bob tactic.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Actually, Wahoos (y'know the guy I originally responded to) said Garrett has done nothing to show he's capable of being a legit OC in this league, and has since said it was an overstatement. The only person who can't figure that shit out is you.

Hoofbite is UVAWahoos?

Naw, you just don't understand shit about football cause you're a fucking moron.

It's a universal Bob tactic.

Hmm, I thought the basic concept of football was to score more than the guys wearing the other uniforms?

 

[dbair1967]

That was a gross exaggeration on my part, but you know better than to use total offense as a stat to support him. We've been in the bottom of the league in redzone efficiency and and middle of the pack in scoring. Plus, rather than build upon that 2009 wildcard win, we've basically done a nosedive back towards the pre-Parcells years. Garrett has been apart of it the entire time, so to fire Wade and say that Garrett did not contribute to the issues is very naive and ignorant. So at the very least, that little ginger could use some Sparano support if he's gonna stick around here. Garrett is a smart dude and might be a great coach one day, but his lack of experience was a huge detriment to this team multiple times over the year. At the very least, I think we should be playing a football game right now rather than watching the Giants.

For a guy that doesnt know what he is doing, we seem to have a QB who posts huge numbers almost year in and year out and continues to get better. We do move the ball, despite having what almost unversially is regarded as a mediocre to poorous OL. Ths is the first year he's run things, and they addressed OL concerns for the first time in awhile.

 

[peplaw06]

Hoofbite is UVAWahoos?

Read the fucking thread... then respond.

Hmm, I thought the basic concept of football was to score more than the guys wearing the other uniforms?

Be careful, you'll hurt yourself going much deeper than that. You should stop now.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I do what I want. Garrett sucks.

 

[Theebs]

What is so damn hard to understand about this Bob? No one said he's the best ever. Try to exercise those brain cells for once in your life.

Remember who your talking to.

Half f the people here only respond to teh jerruh and how he needs to die....no gray area...

Just teh jerruh.

 

[Hoofbite]

Here's a challenge.

I want someone who's satisfied with JG results to rank Romo in regards to his place as a QB in the NFL.

Rank him where you want him. 4th? 6th? 8th?

Now, look at the QBs ahead of him and find me a single offense that has had more mediocre results than Dallas has.

People like to throw Romo's name in there just behind Brees, Rodgers, Brady, Manning and a few others but you find me one of those teams who struggles as consistently to put up the points they should given their yardage totals.

 

[dbair1967]

Here's a challenge.

I want someone who's satisfied with JG results to rank Romo in regards to his place as a QB in the NFL.

Rank him where you want him. 4th? 6th? 8th?

Now, look at the QBs ahead of him and find me a single offense that has had more mediocre results than Dallas has.

People like to throw Romo's name in there just behind Brees, Rodgers, Brady, Manning and a few others but you find me one of those teams who struggles as consistently to put up the points they should given their yardage totals.

We've averaged 384.5 pts per season since Garrett became offensive coordinator. Thats just over 24 pts per game. That really isnt an example of "struggles to consistently put up points". "Struggles to score points" would be ending up well under 20 pts per game (less than 320 per season) or even worse.

Romo is very good when he is on, but he is not on that exact level of QB's you listed above. All those guys are better than he is, its even likely all of them end up in the Hall of Fame. (Rodgers would need to keep up his current pace, but the other 3 are locks)

 

[Hoofbite]

We've averaged 384.5 pts per season since Garrett became offensive coordinator. Thats just over 24 pts per game. That really isnt an example of "struggles to consistently put up points". "Struggles to score points" would be ending up well under 20 pts per game (less than 320 per season) or even worse.

Romo is very good when he is on, but he is not on that exact level of QB's you listed above. All those guys are better than he is, its even likely all of them end up in the Hall of Fame. (Rodgers would need to keep up his current pace, but the other 3 are locks)

Please rank Romo and the QBs ahead of him.

 

[dbair1967]

Please rank Romo and the QBs ahead of him.

I'd put all 4 of the guys you listed ahead of him. Would put Rivers slightly ahead of him.

I'd have Romo in the same group as guys like Rapistberger, Stafford, E Manning and maybe Schaub