Good reply. One other thought on the stops... In most of the towns in my area they have deployed ALPR scanners that automatically run every plate. It takes race out of it and is solely based on the plate number and if a warrant is attached to the owner of the car. Pretty fair way to go about it, but a bit creepy also, because they keep all the information about every car scanned for 1-3 years.
St. Louis and some surrounding cities started using the same system in 2011. Not sure about Ferguson.
Here is link about it.
Car-mounted cameras alert St. Louis cops to iffy plates : News
Good reply. One other thought on the stops... In most of the towns in my area they have deployed ALPR scanners that automatically run every plate. It takes race out of it and is solely based on the plate number and if a warrant is attached to the owner of the car. Pretty fair way to go about it, but a bit creepy also, because they keep all the information about every car scanned for 1-3 years.
St. Louis and some surrounding cities started using the same system in 2011. Not sure about Ferguson.
Here is link about it.
Car-mounted cameras alert St. Louis cops to iffy plates : News
That is a interesting item but I would doubt Ferguson has them.
They have 2 dash cams that aren't even installed because they couldn't afford to put them in. If they did have it I would think they would have stats for stops due to existing warrants, not just searches.
Who knows. Warrant aspect was so small in the grand scheme it doesn't really alter the reality.
Storage is cheap, but why keep anything longer then you need. It just means more illegal police behavior will come to light. I mean your landlord only has to keep your rental contract 6 times longer them the police need to keep their video...Where I work, we pretty much pioneered the LPR type system setup in enforcement kind of environments. We actually got an opens records request from the ACLU about our system a year or so after launch. The biggest discussion right now in Congress is the length of retention of records. 1-3 years is going to be way longer than what they come up with. Most in the industry are guessing 6 months will be the ceiling on retention.
Storage is cheap, but why keep anything longer then you need. It just means more illegal police behavior will come to light. I mean your landlord only has to keep your rental contract 6 times longer them the police need to keep their video...
All the lost police and IRS record make it clear to me that the government can not be trusted with its own records and a private company should have them (I trust the gov to over police any free enterprise).
how about the basic human right of not getting shot by out of control police
good point
lots of southerners in this thread for example
You god damn right that's how it works. I have already stated a few times in this thread that there should be dash and lapel cams to protect both the citizens and cops. Since there is none in this case, it is just as valid that you can't prove the charging grizzly didn't do what has been reported by more than a dozen witnesses as it is that I can't prove that he didn't, which is only corroborated by witnesses whose statements have been proven false by the autopsy.
Ironic, since YOU are convicting the officer of MURDER without any proof whatsoever. "Innocent until proven guilty" only counts when it fits the agenda, right dumbfuck?your dumb ass doesn't understand burden of proof.
Don't dbair me bro