- Messages
- 21,914
- Reaction score
- 4,432
Umm, no. I said had Seattle challenged THE CATCH. They did not. They challenged whether he was in bounds or not.I did read. You said had Seattle challenged (which they in fact did) it would have been overturned. Meaning it wasn't a catch.
My FEAR was, had they challenged the catch itself these idiots might have overturned the call on the field.