Dumb POS mods on the Zone deleting all negative posts related to Brent

jnday · Oct 8, 2014

cmd34(work) said:
No way he ever played this game.

I would guess that he took daily beatings though.

Bob Sacamano · Oct 8, 2014

fuzzy didn't care much for football in his younger days. Was too busy stealing and dealing drugs.

bbgun · Oct 8, 2014

he's even grumpy on his bday. sad.

Doomsday · Oct 8, 2014

We missed you on game day Fuzzy.... Is this the only thread you want to post in? You know, the one about the Nazi-like regime at CZ?

Start a thread about CZ Mods, get 100 posts from Fuzzy in it. Win-win. :lol

peplaw06 · Oct 8, 2014

FuzzyLumpkins said:
I wasnt bitching about cliches. I said that your guys behavior is cliche. Try harder on understanding nuance, counselor crayola.

Predictable... When you've been called out, however minor the accusation is, obfuscate and deflect.

So you were just pointing out cliche behavior, and not implying anything with the comment? I call bullshit.

peplaw06 · Oct 8, 2014

bbgun said:
he's even grumpy on his bday. sad.

He must be invited to all the parties.

ThoughtExperiment · Oct 8, 2014

If ten people tell you you're drunk, maybe it isn't "groupthink". Maybe you're just drunk.

Doomsday · Oct 8, 2014

Doomsday said:
You've inspired me to start working on a plugin which will allow for blocking individual avatars and signatures, in your UserCP settings.

Stay tuned.

This is now done.

Ignore that annoying avatar

JBond · Oct 8, 2014

dbair1967 said:
Thread FAIL

It is the most successful thread in months. Little lump is the designated defender of the asinine homers at the zone. They play favorites and lie continually about it. Bunch of little bitches. Little cancerous lump is one of the pathetic ringleaders. The egomaniac lump and his jolly band of fags can kiss my furry ass.

jnday · Oct 8, 2014

Bob Sacamano said:
fuzzy didn't care much for football in his younger days. Was too busy stealing and dealing drugs.

I would imagine that he was much more likeable as a thief and dealer .

JBond · Oct 8, 2014

Lump sold drugs for a living or to feed his habit? Nevermind. Someone will fill me in on the back story

FuzzyLumpkins · Oct 9, 2014

peplaw06 said:
Predictable... When you've been called out, however minor the accusation is, obfuscate and deflect.

So you were just pointing out cliche behavior, and not implying anything with the comment? I call bullshit.

I come home to find this?

My comment was the you guys groupthink so much that is is cliche. My issue is with the groupthink and not you doing it to such extent that it is cliche.

An example of obfuscation is your fixation on me saying 'cliche' and ignoring the groupthink argument, counselor crayola.

FuzzyLumpkins · Oct 9, 2014

jnday said:
I don't have to look it up. A better question is why do you consider this board's members as sharing groupthink when you have 100 times more of your homer buddies that think just like you? Are you not part of a larger group that is guilty of groupthink? Yes you are which makes you full of shit on many levels.

Even were this true, "they did it too," stopped being a valid excuse when I was about 4.

Now, how about you demonstrate me parroting other's take as a matter of course demonstrating groupthink. For example, you guys conflation of CZ and me, four of you parroting the same joke and pointed out by everlast, or this most recent attempt at marginalization trying to paint me as a criminal.

The CZ as boogeyman shared brain experience of you guys is my personal favorite.

peplaw06 · Oct 9, 2014

FuzzyLumpkins said:
My comment was the you guys groupthink so much that is is cliche. My issue is with the groupthink and not you doing it to such extent that it is cliche.

And my issue is that you use the term groupthink so much that it has become cliche. You don't like that I called you out, so you started deflecting.

See, this is what you do... you try to get the conversation bogged down in the minutiae so you can avoid giving anyone an inch. If someone doesn't repeat your position exactly, they are wrong. You don't "allow" anyone to imply anything by your posts. It's all black and white to you.

That's not how I work... sorry.

An example of obfuscation is your fixation on me saying 'cliche' and ignoring the groupthink argument, counselor crayola.

It's not my fixation. I thought it mildly humorous and hypocritical, and stated such. You began on the spiral into the black hole of your "debate tactics." I ignore things I don't find value in. The only value in you as a poster or your accusations of "cliche," is the comedic value. You're a punchline.

Now you can post some more about groupthink. 20 guys on this board could tell you the sky is blue and you'd ignore the veracity of the comment and accuse them of groupthink.

Bluenoser · Oct 9, 2014

Is this thread worth the time to read?

bbgun · Oct 9, 2014

Bluenoser said:
Is this thread worth the time to read?

only if you like the words stoic, parrot and groupthink.

FuzzyLumpkins · Oct 9, 2014

peplaw06 said:
And my issue is that you use the term groupthink so much that it has become cliche. You don't like that I called you out, so you started deflecting.

See, this is what you do... you try to get the conversation bogged down in the minutiae so you can avoid giving anyone an inch. If someone doesn't repeat your position exactly, they are wrong. You don't "allow" anyone to imply anything by your posts. It's all black and white to you.

That's not how I work... sorry.

It's not my fixation. I thought it mildly humorous and hypocritical, and stated such. You began on the spiral into the black hole of your "debate tactics." I ignore things I don't find value in. The only value in you as a poster or your accusations of "cliche," is the comedic value. You're a punchline.

Now you can post some more about groupthink. 20 guys on this board could tell you the sky is blue and you'd ignore the veracity of the comment and accuse them of groupthink.

Well if you write your responses to the oppositions arguments in crayon and try this bait and switch routine how does that work out. You gotten a judge to buy it yet or you just save it for the dimwits here?

The way you work is that you interject yourself into the argument and then try to define it as something else. Then after said obfuscation you try and pin obfuscation on the one you are trying the bait and switch routine. The hypocrite claim is delicious in that light. You go ahead and continue your crusade against cliches, counselor crayola.

In the meantime I will reiterate the examples of groupthink demonstrated repeatedly in this thread. You don't even argue that it exists. Thanks, counselor, you are so very good at argumentation. . . Instead you present an objective fact and a hypothetical. What you dumb ass still doesn't see is that the truth of the statement is independent of you dimwits agreeing on it. That you state it as such only furthers my point of your fucks delusions as if you are some sort of causa prima.

What do bandwagon fallacy mean.

But go ahead and wave your hands some more at cliches and try and tell me what my central argument is.

FuzzyLumpkins · Oct 9, 2014

Bluenoser said:
Is this thread worth the time to read?

If you are interested in the length that these guys will go to try and avoid having their methods and motives examined certainly. If you already know how they roll then not really.

Doomsday · Oct 9, 2014

You're fast becoming a parody of yourself, Lumpy.

Bob Sacamano · Oct 9, 2014

What do you expect to glean from taking this position, fuzzy?

UDFA

All-Pro

Administrator

High Plains Drifter

2

2

Quality Starter

High Plains Drifter

UDFA

UDFA

UDFA

In the Rotation

In the Rotation

2

In the Rotation

Administrator

In the Rotation

In the Rotation

High Plains Drifter

All-Pro