Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
it was probably changing the coaches.

We have no money to be players and there is no qb or plain stud to go up and get.

broaddus even said that in his opinion none of the guards are at the same level as decastro, said none of them have the long term success decastro will have.

so if decastro went in the 20s and he was a better prospect and we turn around and take a guard of lesser talent at 18 what does that say? pretty dumb.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Broaddus is high. Decastro is a jag, warmack has HOF potential.

But I agree it's probably the coaches/move to a 4-3.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
59,972
Reaction score
10,143
Broaddus is high. Decastro is a jag, warmack has HOF potential.

But I agree it's probably the coaches/move to a 4-3.

I agree, dont know what Broddus is smoking on thise Decastro/Warmack stuff.

Warmack was even more dominant than DeCastro was, and did it against the best defensive talent in college football week in and week out.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Probably because Warmack is only an OK athlete. The reason Mike Iupati went at 17 is because he's so flexible as an athlete.

It's not good policy to invest heavily in a straight mailing OG.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Another vote for the Broaddus is a loon camp.

Maybe he bought way too far into the RKG thing, like Decastro gets bonus points because he has a Stanford degree. Or something.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
0
Good thing Decastro is so athletic it helps him not fall down when he's being driven backwards by players with actual lower body strength.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Thats why he didn't go near the middle of the 1st. Iupati offered the best of both worlds, Pork Chop and DeCocksucker do not.
 
Top Bottom