Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/news/supreme-court-strikes-down-doma-140330141.html

In its first ever case on the issue of gay marriage, the Supreme Court has struck down a federal law barring the recognition of same-sex marriage in a split decision, ruling that the law violates the rights of gays and lesbians and intrudes into states' rights to define and regulate marriage.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court's conservative-leaning swing vote with a legal history of supporting gay rights, joined his liberal colleagues in the decision, which will dramatically expand the rights of married gay couples in the country to access more than 1,000 federal benefits and responsibilities of marriage previously denied them.

"DOMA seeks to injure the very class New York seeks to protect," Kennedy wrote. "By doing so it violates basic due process and equal protection principles applicable to the Federal Government."

"The avowed purpose and practical effect of the law here in question are to impose a disadvantage, a separate status, and so a stigma upon all who enter into same-sex marriages made lawful by the unquestioned authority of the States," Kennedy continued.

The case is Windsor v. United States, a challenge to the federal 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages even in the 12 states and District of Columbia that allow them. DOMA extends to more than 1,000 federal laws and statutes, including immigration, taxes, and Social Security benefits.

Eighty-three-year-old New Yorker Edith Windsor brought the suit after she was made to pay more than $363,000 in estate taxes when her same-sex spouse died. If the federal government had recognized her marriage, Windsor would not have owed the sum. She argued that the government has no rational reason to exclude her marriage of more than four decades from the benefits and obligations other married couples receive.

DOMA was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996.

Kennedy authored two of the most important Supreme Court decisions involving, and ultimately affirming, gay rights: Lawrence v. Texas (2003) and Romer v. Evans (1996). In Romer, Kennedy struck down Colorado's constitutional amendment banning localities from passing anti-discrimination laws protecting gays and lesbians. In Romer, Kennedy invalidated state anti-sodomy laws, ruling that gay people have a right to engage in sexual behavior in their own homes.

The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) has defended DOMA since the Obama administration announced they believed the law was unconstitutional in 2011. (Chief Justice John Roberts criticized the president for this move during oral arguments in the case, saying the president lacked “the courage of his convictions” in continuing to enforce the law but no longer defending it in court.)
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Prop. 8 challenge was dismissed on standing grounds. SCOTUS punted. But it leaves the trial court's strike of the law in tact.
 

JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
Sweet....Is polygamy next? I want to legalize my harem for the tax breaks.
 

VTA

UDFA
Messages
2,668
Reaction score
594
Sweet....Is polygamy next? I want to legalize my harem for the tax breaks.

It seems they are.

Polygamists See Gay Marriage Ruling Opening Door to Multiple Marriages


Polygamists cheered the Supreme Court for their gay marriage rulings Wednesday, which they considered one step forward for the legal and social acceptance of multi-person relationships.

"We polyamorists are grateful to our [LGBT] brothers and sisters for blazing the marriage equality trail," Practical Polyamory spokeswoman Anita Wagner Illig told U.S. News & World Report.

"The nuclear family, with a dad and a mom and two or three kids, is not the majority anymore," former polygamist Anne Wilde told BuzzFeed."Now it's grandparents taking care of kids, single parents, gay parents. I think people are more and more understanding that as consenting adults, we should be able to raise a family however we choose."

Others polygamists say they don’t want their lifestyle to necessarily be legalized, but just decriminalized.

"If you legalize plural marriage, that means the government is going to control certain aspects of it," Wilde said. "They might say, you have to make so much money, you can't have any more than four like it says in the Koran."

Link
 

lons

UDFA
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
100
How and why anyone could possibly want to have multiple wives with the divorce laws the way they are. Blows my fucking mind...
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
How and why anyone could possibly want to have multiple wives with the divorce laws the way they are. Blows my fucking mind...

What's half of a half of a half of a half?

Although I'm not sure if the fundamentalists "believe" in divorce. At least not fundamentalist LDS.......I think.
 
Top Bottom