Fast forward to years end... who will prove to be the Cowboys rookie of the year?


  • Total voters
    16

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
What a simpleton.

lol

Bobbeh has nothing. Goes back in the thread for.....nothing. Did you not read the four words following what you bolded? Pay special attention to the second word. Or do you not comprehend what they mean? I'll guess it was the latter. I said it and I meant it. No point in wasting my time discussing the topic at hand with you. Which was about the rookies. But I'll trade insults with you all night long. I love poking retards with a stick. A hobby of mine, I admit.

So who was the simpleton again, Ruprecht?
 

GloryDaysRBack

Quality Starter
Messages
5,080
Reaction score
0
I have to go with Murray

this team had NO chance with Bailey and Smith and Murray getting no time...ever since Murray hit the scene this team has improved immensely..its that simple for me

edit*** i have no idea how bad this team would be with Parnell starting at RT..but I dont think the outlook is good..

this is so difficult..Bailey doesnt play enough snaps to win this..Murray vs Smith IMO
 
Last edited:

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
lol

Bobbeh has nothing. Goes back in the thread for.....nothing. Did you not read the four words following what you bolded? Pay special attention to the second word. Or do you not comprehend what they mean? I'll guess it was the latter. I said it and I meant it. No point in wasting my time discussing the topic at hand with you. Which was about the rookies. But I'll trade insults with you all night long. I love poking retards with a stick. A hobby of mine, I admit.

So who was the simpleton again, Ruprecht?

spin-spin-spin

Fact is, the only person who came crying in this thread was you. You were the, "HMMPH why isn't anyone taking me seriously??!!" guy.

But please my little Snuggles bear, spin some more.
 
Last edited:

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
spin-spin-spin

Fact is, the only person who came crying in this thread was you. You were the, "HMMPH why isn't anyone taking me seriously??!!" guy.

Show me where I did that. You can't, because it didn't happen. Making stuff up again.

And what am I spinning? You brought the quote. Go look what it was in response to, and see if you can wrap your mind around what it meant. It's not hard.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Show me where I did that. You can't, because it didn't happen. Making stuff up again.

And what am I spinning? You brought the quote. Go look what it was in response to, and see if you can wrap your mind around what it meant. It's not hard.

I know exactly what it meant. It was a lame attempt, preceding ever more lamer attempts, to disparage me after I poked fun.
 

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
I know exactly what it meant. It was a lame attempt, preceding ever more lamer attempts, to disparage me after I poked fun.

You're boring, Bob. I'd thought you would have the mental acuity to hold up in this. But you clearly don't. Randomly making stuff up, then just ignoring it when called on it is 2nd grade level at best. And that would be the "special" group of 2nd graders.

I know. Now compare me to CCBoy, or CrazyCowboy. Your epic blast will completely stupify me, and I will be unable to continue. Pinky swear.

Here's your big finish. Don't disappoint us.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
That was tough to decide but I went with Murray.

All three of those players have done a good job for us and all of them could be debated.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
You're boring, Bob. I'd thought you would have the mental acuity to hold up in this. But you clearly don't. Randomly making stuff up, then just ignoring it when called on it is 2nd grade level at best. And that would be the "special" group of 2nd graders.

I know. Now compare me to CCBoy, or CrazyCowboy. Your epic blast will completely stupify me, and I will be unable to continue. Pinky swear.

Here's your big finish. Don't disappoint us.

1st I'll have you explain how winning games all starts up front...at RT...
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
It all starts up front. I voted T. Smith. If we still had Colombo there, Murray wouldn't look nearly as good as he does. Smith is helping to let this line come together. It was a nightmare last year. No line, no offense. Plus, he's been there from the start. Murray is tearing it up, but has only come on recently. Bailey is also performing way beyond anybody would have dreamed, but again. If we have no line, we aren't in position to win games.

Explain what these mean then? Sounds like you believe Smith is the variable factor between us winning and losing games.
 

NoDak

UDFA
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
0
Explain what these mean then? Sounds like you believe Smith is the variable factor between us winning and losing games.

If you look further, you'll see where I also said Smith is HELPING to let the line come together. Never have I said or implied that he is the one reason we are winning games, as you are saying I am.

And I'll stick with what I've said. Smith is playing very well, and it helps the line to do it's job as a whole. We've had very good skill position players the last 5 or 6 years. And what has it got us? At best, we've had servicable Olines. If they don't open holes, or passblock it's pretty hard to have a succesful offense.

And as far as the last line you bolded, it is just what it says. If we have no line, we aren't in position to win games. Meaning our offensive line would allow us to have a productive offense. To control the clock. To score enough to win. And if we're not doing that, if we're behind in games, we won't be able to run as much. Or have as many opporunties at FGs, much less game winning FGs. As we've seen our Oline get better at pass blocking this year, we've seen Romo play under more control. Which in turn results in less turnovers. And that line is getting better at run blocking. Still needs work, as it still stalls. Especially without Fiametta in there. But with that run game going, it also helps Romo and the rest. And it all starts with the Oline.

We've been able to score points in the past. But never really been able to control the game. It's been a long time since we could lean on the running game to close out a game. Instead, we've still passed the ball when up late in the game. And we've seen how that has bit us in the ass on more then one occasion.

So, no. I wasn't saying Smith was THE variable factor in us winning or losing games. But he is a very important piece to one of them that is.

If you think Murray is doing well this year, I'd say just wait. If we were to get better in the interior of the line, I think he'd really look like a monster. Which in turn would make our passing game more dangerous. And for both of those things to happen, it all starts up front.
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
Going with Tyron Smith here.

Bailey has made some clutch kicks and I praise him for that.. but he's still a kicker.

OT plays more snaps. And in a pass happy league with some elite pass rushers... its vital that we have an OT like Smith to help protect our franchise QB.

Look at this this way, IF one of those two were to get hurt and lost for the year.. which would you rather it NOT be?

I sure as fuck don't want to lose Tyron Smith.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Just like I said there could be a debate for each player. Without any of those three we would be fucked.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
I picked Bailey because he finally forced that Chuck Norris wannabe off our roster. Jerry didn't want to let him go but he had no choice in the end.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
I picked Bailey because he finally forced that Chuck Norris wannabe off our roster. Jerry didn't want to let him go but he had no choice in the end.

I love how Jerry was 100% emphatically behind him until he got hurt, then threw him under the bus and said it was because he was poorly conditioned :confused
 
Top Bottom