Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
Scout's Big Prediction: Hanna Contributes More Than Escobar

Posted 27 minutes ago
broaddus_50.jpg

Bryan Broaddus
Football Analyst/Scout


Hanna_070513_650.jpg


When I last worked for Bill Parcells in 2005, he would always use a line in the personnel meetings that I thought was outstanding. When a scout would go on and on about a player, Parcells would say “Well, your pet cat….” which always put a smile on my face because everyone in the room knew he was right. If I was still scouting for this team, James Hanna would be my pet cat.

When he was drafted last season out of Oklahoma, I honestly didn’t know very much about him and the type of traits he brought to a team. His film was solid but not dominating. He showed up as an outstanding athlete that would make crazy contested catches but would drop balls when he was alone in space. He wasn’t the type of blocker that would lead you to believe that he could be a force as an inline “Y” because most of his blocks were executed on the move but he has developed some inline techniques. Where Hanna made his biggest jump was on the scout team working with Kyle Orton. There were several weeks where the defense had to face a quality tight end and Hanna was making play after play against Rob Ryan’s group and the coaches stood up and took notice.

With the push of Garrett and Callahan to use “12” personnel as a base package, the club went out and drafted Gavin Escobar in the 2nd round but was interesting, knowing they were looking to go with this package is they passed on the best tight end in the draft, Tyler Eifert who ended up in Cincinnati which might have made some sense. Escobar has some really nice traits with his hands and size but he is nowhere as athletic as Hanna who can be a mismatch problem for a defense much like Jason Witten.

When I watch Hanna play, I see an explosive, up the field player that runs smooth routes and plays with an ease of movement. I don’t hear Jason Garrett asking him to play faster or quicker like I do with Escobar. There is suddenness to Hanna’s game and you see it whether he is blocking or catching the ball. He has developed more as a catcher and there is consistency there which at Oklahoma, there was none. I really thought he was a 50-50 catcher in college but if the ball is in the frame work of his body or he has to make a serious adjustment, he can pull it off.

I really do like what they are doing scheme wise in this “12” personnel because I feel like it takes advantage of the strengths of these tight ends. It’s not asking them to stand in there toe-to-toe and have to hammer someone on the line but it also gives them the flexibility to get athletic receivers into the route. I understand why they drafted Gavin Escobar and one day he has a chance to develop but if you are asking me right, who is the best man for the job to be on the field with Jason Witten, it’s James Hanna in my book and I haven’t even given that a second thought. Hanna will be a very productive player for this squad whenever he is called on to do so.

Position Preview: Tight Ends >>
 
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
Escobar's 4.8 40 time is ridiculous. Of all our draft picks I liked this one least.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
His 7.03 3-cone and 4.31 20-yard shuttle were top-notch and a better indicator of on-field success.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Check my post history. I've been on the Hanna bandwagon for a long time.

I don't understand the Escobar selection because we have Hanna. He's a match up nightmare. Talented kid. Love the player.

I seen one San Diego State game when they played BYU, and Escobar flashed - no doubt about that. But Hanna has a future in this league without question.

That said... theebs convinced me before he left that we need 6 TE's in order for our offense to work effectively so maybe the selection makes sense afterall.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
The thing about the Escobar pick is that even after we drafted him we had to add another TE because he is not a great blocker. So we drafted an athletic pass catching TE that is slower and less athletic than the one we had on the roster. W00t
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
And missed out on some talented offensive/defensive lineman & safeties in the process.
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
And missed out on some talented offensive/defensive lineman & safeties in the process.

This is what pisses me off the most. We had at least 2 quality safeties on the board when we took him. A very high position of need. Yet, we go after a god damn TE again. And then go after another in FA.

Well oiled machine.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Hanna is so highly thought of that only Cowboy fans hype him up.

He wasn't highly regarded entering the draft and went exactly where everyone had him pegged. But all of a sudden he's the lynchpin of our base package on offense.

Crazy.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
I'm kind of with you on Hanna. Not saying he can't make some catches here or there, but seems to me like people are a little too sold on him based on, what, a couple catches in the Pittsburgh game?

Not that that means I like the Escobar pick, because I don't. I think the whole "12" nonsense is flawed.
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
Very similar players.

Hanna did his against stiffer competition though.

Exactly, so we should have gone after another position of need with that pick since there was talent on the board. IMO, it was a very confusing pick.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
Hanna is so highly thought of that only Cowboy fans hype him up.

He wasn't highly regarded entering the draft and went exactly where everyone had him pegged. But all of a sudden he's the lynchpin of our base package on offense.

Crazy.

Exaggerate much? No one is carrying on like that and everyone knows that the 2nd TE is not going to produce much with all the other weapons. Whether that is Hanna or Escobar.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I'm kind of with you on Hanna. Not saying he can't make some catches here or there, but seems to me like people are a little too sold on him based on, what, a couple catches in the Pittsburgh game?

Not that that means I like the Escobar pick, because I don't. I think the whole "12" nonsense is flawed.

Every offseason for Cowboy fans it goes on like this.

Last year it was Kowalksi helping to shore up the Oline.

This year, we don't need to draft a highly regarded TE. We have James Hanna.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
Every offseason for Cowboy fans it goes on like this.

Last year it was Kowalksi helping to shore up the Oline.

This year, we don't need to draft a highly regarded TE. We have James Hanna.

You seem oblivious to the fact that we passed on players like Hunt, Brown, Warford, and Swearinger to take Escobar.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
We passed on Reid and Floyd to take Frederick, and yet you direct your most dislike on the Pablo selection?
 
Top Bottom