I am not fond of the government or the lawyers. The government is made up of lawyers, so they are one the same. With that being said, I have two lawyers That I have retained to take care of some stuff, so you have a point, we have to deal with them.
Like what?
Trump is also a businessman. This country has been run he lawyers for too long. Lawyers are not qualified to create budgets and the government is one big business.
Oh yeah... build a wall! Talk about pandering. There's literally no way he's building a wall, or getting Mexico to pay for it, or rounding up 11 million people and deporting them. It's all a crock of shit.
That's ridiculous. He's offended women, the mentally handicapped, hispanics, blacks, and so on.... That's not how you win an election, and it's not how you run a country. You might even think that all of those segments of people are responsible for what is wrong with the country.... it's just not a winning strategy. Ad it's definitely not a "breath of fresh air."
That may be true, but Johnson is not a legit candidate in this race. He will not get 5% of the vote. A vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary. If a Trump does 1/10 of the things he is wanting to do, he will be the best president in modern times. If he only exposes the corruption in this government , he will be a great president. Of course there could be better candidates, but there is not. There is two realistic choices. Pick our poison:
Now we see you can't read either. The Bard wasn't advocating what you assume there. You either missed the context or actually never read the work. It's from Henry VI and it's Dick the Butcher - a fictional character - who said 'kill all the lawyers' not Shakespeare. Try actually reading books instead of burning them. You don't know that you don't know.
Really, back to the ad hominems? So predictable.
This is a circular argument. The only reason you don't think he's a legit candidate is because you're short-sighted enough to think you can only vote for one of two choices. You're perpetuating the two party system by saying a vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary. Some polls have him in the double digits, and some have him drawing more from Hillary than from Trump. Uneducated voters are the problem. They either don't know there are other options, or they think that the other options aren't realistic. I got news for you, if they're on the ballot, then they're realistic options... if the educated voters will actually do something other than live in fear that not voting for one of two awful choices were a wasted vote. The two parties WANT you to beleve you're wasting votes by voting for someone else. Right now, they don't have to field the best candidate, they only have to field a candidate better than one other party.
He wants to legalize marijuana. So what? You want alcohol and cigarettes banned to? You want the government telling you what you can and can't put into your body? You didn't strike me as the type who wanted the nanny-state.
Plenty of =/= majority. I hardly pay attention to the main stream media. You only have to watch Trump's twitter account to know this stuff.
In reality, we are limited to two parties. The election results will prove my point on that. It will take a well-known, strong candidate to ever have a chance to be elected as a third party candidate and Johnson doesn't fit that description. I don't like it, but that is the way things are. The democrats, republicans, and media are against Trump. I see that as a good thing because I hate all three and it makes the choice simple. Like any big businessman, Trump has made enemies, but there has been nobody step up and prove he was not ethical in his dealings.bafter the Dallas cop shootings, Trump will get a big boost in the polls because he is not soft about his feelings towards the BLM movement. It should be rnough to put him on top and that is a good thing unless you support Hillary.
