And you simply ignore anything that doesnt. Spiderfan.
You might have in which case I applaud . I’m not familiar with your history. I didn’t recognize that responsibility in this thread with OP.
And you simply ignore anything that doesnt. Spiderfan.
Those are opinions you’re certainly entitled to . We certainly didn’t prove it on the field. I would agree coaching was a contributing factor but IMO those weren’t championship caliber teams.I am sure with your great perspective on talented teams that you saw as "championship caliber" those two Giant teams as true juggernauts (even the one in 2011 that gave up 400 pts for the season which was more than they scored offensively, still the only team in league history to do that and win a championship). Or maybe you predicted those injury ravaged 10-6 Green Bay (2010) or Eagles teams (underdog in all 3 postseason games). or the 10-6 Ravens in 2012.
The 2007 and 2009 Cowboys team were just as talented, if not far more talented than any of those teams. The difference as the damn coaching, anybody that can't see that is just blind or a dumbass.
HahahahahahahahahahahhahahhahahhahahhahhahhhahahahahahhaahahahhahhahahahahahahahhahaReport: Jason Garrett's NY Giants Offense Will Look 'Similarly Based' To 2019 Cowboys
With former Dallas Cowboys head coach Jason Garrett now running the offense, New York Giants will reportedly be implementing an offense that will be very familiar to Cowboys fans.1053thefan.radio.com
Interesting we are the only team on the list that never saw a conference championship game or a super bowl, but #2 on the list overall. Tells us talent really wasn't the main problem.
Exactly what I said in my next post after the one you just quoted.Interesting the Pats, the team with the most SBs since '96 didn't make that PB list.
Silly premise. Great talent comes through in spite of bad coaching, not because of it. Besides, all in all the position coaches we've had haven't been all bad, some of them even making excellent head coaches later on.And I'd note several of the Boys' "talented" PB players were very well coached or would never have made a PB.
It is. Exactly like that. They weren't RFAs they were UDFAs.It's not like Austin or Romo weren't RFAs when they arrived.
When you let a 2 time SB winning coach leave ...
Silly premise. Great talent comes through in spite of bad coaching.
Jerry's hired all of the head coaches. No shit, huh?
We've had the player talent to win Super Bowls. Coaching has been the main reason it hasn't happened. Feckless owner hired the coaches.JJ's done that three times and you're talking about the coaches he hired to replace them as the problem?
the whole "premise" of the thread is the Boys have suffered from bad coaches who've handicapped great talent
the same owners and GMs that make dumb (weird) coaching moves make dumb (weird) player moves
JJ ran the draft room too … huh?
that's utter BS - the whole premise of "pro bowls equals talent" thread is sillyWe've had the player talent to win Super Bowls. Coaching has been the main reason it hasn't happened. Feckless owner hired the coaches.
Nobody said that. You are now creating false points to argue against. Therefore showing you're dishonest as well as just stupid."pro bowls equals talent"
Nobody said that. You are now creating false points to argue against. Therefore showing you're dishonest as well as just stupid.
There's an increasing percentage of the population who live in a fact-free world. Their "narrative" is substituted for fact. Anything not supporting their "narrative" is either ignored or simply substituted with a lie to then argue against. It's a growing problem.Yeah...it's what people do when they have nothing, are just plain stupid or have no answer. Make up your own argument like someone else said it and then argue against it......I don't necessarily blame him though. He's a product of our current education system.