peplaw06
2
- Messages
- 8,660
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think proving the intent was the driving force behind the deal. They are pleading him to reckless assault, which by definition is easier to prove than an aggravated assault... but it's more about the publicity IMO.But the highest charge is for intentional harm, not accidental or merely negligent harm. Proving intent is the toughie, I would think. Giving the prosecutor the incentive to make a deal.
Nope... not expunged. Dismissed. There's a huge difference.Either way it is a good deal for Peterson, he merely needs to hold true to all the conditions and the whole thing gets expunged.