- Thread starter Maveric
- Start date
theoneandonly
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 5,274
- Reaction score
- 561
Believe me I am by no means guaranteeing any kind of outcome for the Cowboys. Nothing would surprise me at all. I will however guarantee at least one turn over for Goff. He is a turnover machine.
theoneandonly
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 5,274
- Reaction score
- 561
69ers going all in like the Rams did last year. I do agree McCaffrey spends too many games inactive for my taste but basically their draft was already fucked when they gave three number one picks for a QB who looks more likely to bust than not.
theoneandonly
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 5,274
- Reaction score
- 561
Dooms you have have called your share of upsets that the Cowboys have been on the wrong side of. Would not shock me in the least.
theoneandonly
Quality Starter
- Messages
- 5,274
- Reaction score
- 561
Maveric
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 10,560
- Reaction score
- 6,281
Seattle dropped 48 on them, no way they hold Dallas to 9.
- Messages
- 21,813
- Reaction score
- 4,320
We shall see.
- Messages
- 21,813
- Reaction score
- 4,320
No. Our coaching is gonna hold us to 9 points.
Would you like it better if I made it 39-28?
- Messages
- 58,638
- Reaction score
- 9,104
That's what saved their season, the injury to the vastly overrated and over-drafted QB
- Messages
- 58,638
- Reaction score
- 9,104
Trade deadline is Tuesday 11/1
I'm not sure who/what they could reasonably trade for that would vastly help the team. In 2018 they desperately needed a WR and traded for Cooper, but they don't "desperately" need a WR at this point.
A really, really good DT would be a nice add but where are they going to get one of those for something fairly reasonable?
Chicago will apparently consider dealing star LB Roquan Smith and he'd be a great addition to our defense, but you also have to re-sign him and he wants a mega contract.
The only other position that makes sense (to me) would be if they got a proven starting LG.
Trading Dalton Schultz, if it could be part of a deal for someone like mentioned above, or a decent draft pick/s should also be a consideration. Ferguson needs to be on the field more as he is clearly a superior run blocker to Schultz, and the receiving skills of Ferguson & Hendershot are not that different from what Schultz can do.
- Messages
- 58,638
- Reaction score
- 9,104
This is the one part of the defense that hasn't came through yet. We're not getting the turnovers we got last year.
Currently we are tied for 18th in the league in turnovers forced and we're 9th in +/- ration at +2. We've currently forced just 7 for the season and that puts us on pace for just under 20 for the season.
For comparison, last yr we ranked 1st in total turnovers with 34 and 1st in turnover ratio at +14
Our current defense does lead the league in sacks and ranks near the top in opposing QB rating, so hopefully that leads to more turnovers the remainder of the year.
Currently we are tied for 18th in the league in turnovers forced and we're 9th in +/- ration at +2. We've currently forced just 7 for the season and that puts us on pace for just under 20 for the season.
For comparison, last yr we ranked 1st in total turnovers with 34 and 1st in turnover ratio at +14
Our current defense does lead the league in sacks and ranks near the top in opposing QB rating, so hopefully that leads to more turnovers the remainder of the year.