Correct.So if Minnesota loses today and philly loses next week and Dallas wins against the redskins, they will be top seed, right????
Wow, how things change so fast!Correct.
I think if SF wins out they get itSo if Minnesota loses today and philly loses next week and Dallas wins against the redskins, they will be top seed, right????
How'd you reach this conclusion?Correct.
I hadn't taken San Francisco into account, was just looking at Philly and Minnesota. But if SF doesn't pull their heads out of their asses against the Raiders, the scenario Kirk asked about would be back in play.How'd you reach this conclusion?
I cant find anything discussing tiebreakers for the top seed, the stuff I've read always says division tiebreaker which is a bit confusing in this instance
SF is undefeated in their division and have a better conference record, I think they have the same record in common opponents so I cant see where Dallas gets the edge
Yeah I was wrong about this, I misread a ticker blurb. They're still alive.Gnats win eliminates GB. Silver lining.
GB are guaranteed a playoff spot if they beat the Lions. Seattle need a win (at home to the Rams) and a GB loss. The Lions need to beat GB and a Seattle loss. This is all excluding the possibility of ties of course.Yeah I was wrong about this, I misread a ticker blurb. They're still alive.
My phone is extremely silent right now. All the Vikings fans I know are either hiding or drinking heavily...
We lose a tie breaker to San Fran. We needed them to lose once (they nearly lost yesterday to a 1st time starting QB for Raiders)So if Minnesota loses today and philly loses next week and Dallas wins against the redskins, they will be top seed, right????
Where'd you get that idea?Gnats win eliminates GB. Silver lining.