You must have slept through last season where we did do a lot of that, putting Smith outside for gadget fun. He was NOT effective on the edge and NOT effective as a blitzer and didn't boost our QB pressure. Did you notice our D sort of went to shit last year compared to previous?I realize its been 15 years or so since we've done that kind of thing around here, so maybe that's why you don't understand the philosophy.
I guess his injury was caused by too much finesse, not by collisions.You also still don't seem to understand the concept of "we don't play a base defense the majority of the time". LVE isnt going to be lining up as a true MLB very often, and even when he does because the game has changed so much the physical pounding he would take there is nowhere near the level if was for MLB's 15-20 years ago, or even 10 years ago. It's a passing league, a finesse league.
I guess his injury was caused by too much finesse, not by collisions.
Increase collisions, increase chances of winding up quadriplegic. MIKE has more collisions and you have a MIKE regardless of set.
There's been zero evidence other than what comes out of his mouth, that Smith can be a force on the outside in the NFL. As I said before, we shall see.
I don't like it, you like it. Both are fair positions. I think it's gadgetry and we're making the decision based on Smith's self hype and not on anything real or tangible.
Collision. And he had neck injury issues in college too. It's not going away.That said, the play he was "injured" on had nothing to do with some massive collision, it was a fluke where Jeff Heath ran into him while he was tackling a guy.
The same defect that retired Irvin and the Moose. Only seems to get found after temporary paralysis from, a collision.am pretty sure some of his "injury" stems from spinal stenosis, which had nothing to do with contact/non-contact/position he plays etc etc.
It's actually something that does exist. He's been tweeting his ideas of tearing up the league from OLB for some time now going all the way back to before the start of last season. With zero evidence to support it, even after they tried it, a lot, last season.This "Jaylon Smith self hype" thing is also a ludicrous idea dude.
Misleading stats... We continuously let much lesser teams like the NY Jest roll all over us... Couldn't stop slop teams from scoring. The ONE time we played an all-out attack posture for a full game, we held the Saints to 10 measly points. And as I predicted we never used that tactic again all season. That known powerhouse Bears team hung 31 on us, Buffalo 26, GB 34, Vikings 28, Detroit 27... We had a weaker schedule but couldn't stop the weaker teams. It wasn't the overall final stats I was referring to, it was the shit results where it shouldn't have been.In terms of your comment about the D going down the shitter last yr, not sure what you would say to prove that. in 2019 we allowed 321 pts, in 2018 we allowed 324 pts. in 2019 we ranked 9th in total defense, in 2018 it was 7th. QB rating against us was actually better last yr (lower) than 2018. We had the exact same number of sacks both seasons. Turnovers were miserable both seasons but really no different.
It's back to the 60s, "read and react" shit. In this scheme, MIKE is taking more hits not less and involved in more collisions.
Exactly. Not the DL. I didn't say the LBs shouldn't read and react. DL "read and react" is 60s football. Upfield Pressure is what the DL should be playing.the LBs read and react
Collision. And he had neck injury issues in college too. It's not going away.
The same defect that retired Irvin and the Moose. Only seems to get found after temporary paralysis from, a collision.
If you don't know that the Mike is the focus of every blocking scheme in this league on every play and therefore IS subject to more collisions than any other position on the D, I don't know what else to tell you.
It's actually something that does exist. He's been tweeting his ideas of tearing up the league from OLB for some time now going all the way back to before the start of last season. With zero evidence to support it, even after they tried it, a lot, last season.
It's such a "finesse" league now that suddenly we decide to greatly beef up the middle of the DL with fatter slower guys which is what you do when you want to use the DL to tie up blockers instead of attacking. Protect the LBs and let them make the plays. It's back to the 60s, "read and react" shit. In this scheme, MIKE is taking more hits not less and involved in more collisions.
Spinal stenosis MLB. And you're cool with it. Pardon my skepticism it's only intelligent to think the worst of this walking wounded time bomb LB corps. One with a gimp knee that still needs a brace, and another with a spinal defect that could kill or cripple him. But let's roll the dice!
Misleading stats... We continuously let much lesser teams like the NY Jest roll all over us... Couldn't stop slop teams from scoring. The ONE time we played an all-out attack posture for a full game, we held the Saints to 10 measly points. And as I predicted we never used that tactic again all season. That known powerhouse Bears team hung 31 on us, Buffalo 26, GB 34, Vikings 28, Detroit 27... We had a weaker schedule but couldn't stop the weaker teams. It wasn't the overall final stats I was referring to, it was the shit results where it shouldn't have been.
you don't seem to think stopping the run matters - remember the Boys last playoff game?
The last playoff game the issue was the Rams picked up some sort of "key" from watching our film throughout the year
what key?
- we ran a 4-2 all day, an idiot named Rod had more fear of Goff than Wilson
when they didn't fire Rod after that game I felt 2019 would be a mess and JG was all but done
It wasn't a description of the flex. There were two points of comparison made with the flex, which are valid. Article is well sourced.that's the worst description of Landry's 4-3 (which he invented) and later variation "flex" defense I've ever seen
Granted, sports medicine and medicine in general have advanced nicely since the 90s. I'm still skeptical though, if LVE's wrecked neck can hold up playing Mike in the NFL. Perfectly reasonable.I have stenosis in my neck and just had surgery to correct part of the problems in May, so i am aware of what it is. There's also varying levels of severity. Things have changed quite a bit since Irvin and Moose retired in large part do to it, and they both had lengthy careers prior to retiring. Some of the stuff they can do today to help correct it probably weren't around in the 90's.
IF you don't look deeper than year-end stats.I am not saying one year was better than the other. They were both similar, and the numbers prove that.
This is correct and yes it was well reported on after the fact. The Rams players were bragging about it after the game.I don't remember all the details, but the Rams players (especially the OL) were all quoted about it after the game. That they knew exactly what our front was going to do based on some sort of movement or signal they saw on film all season.
Surprised none of you have posted this yet. A better signing than Clowney in my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk