@DMN_George
Jerry Jones said he's more encouraged than ever after 2nd half: "They showed me the core of this group are one of the best teams in the NFL.
People blame Romo for bonehead Romo plays, not for the losing. Bonehead Romo plays were just a continuing symptom of the Ginger disease. Fortunately Dak doesn't commit nearly the number of bonehead plays Romo specialized in.
He's a very rich white guy. He's not dying anytime soon. T5hey live forever. He'll out live all of us, and your grandchildren. See how long Al Davis lasted? Almost 100 years. We have at least 30 more years of him. Maybe longer with the improvement of technology.
People blame Romo for bonehead Romo plays, not for the losing. Bonehead Romo plays were just a continuing symptom of the Ginger disease. Fortunately Dak doesn't commit nearly the number of bonehead plays Romo specialized in.
I'm trying to decide if this was worse than 2007
Can't really argue with any of this, but surprised to see you post it. It could merely be that Romo is a victim too, a buy-in to the Ivy League Ginger crap like Jerry and so many others are, they can't see him for what he really is.Actually, he deserves blame for the losing too. Because he obviously signed off on Garrett to Jones himself, and Jerry always did what Tony wanted.
If Romo wanted Garrett replaced with a real HC, he'd have done it. All he had to do was say "I'm not signing a contract extension or freeing up cap space" and Jones would have waxed him.
Instead, Romo liked the buddy buddy lifestyle he and Garrett had, and loved the idea that there was no real offensive system he had to adhere to. If Romo wanted freedome to change all the run calls to passes, he had it.
And lastly, I don't think "winning" ever meant as much to Romo as it did to people like Staubach and Aikman. Romo didn't hold teammates accountable for lackluster work ethic or not putting time in. He was happy being one of the guys, being on the field and playing the game.
I'm trying to decide if this was worse than 2007
Can't really argue with any of this, but surprised to see you post it. It could merely be that Romo is a victim too, a buy-in to the Ivy League Ginger crap like Jerry and so many others are, they can't see him for what he really is.
Actually, he deserves blame for the losing too. Because he obviously signed off on Garrett to Jones himself, and Jerry always did what Tony wanted.
If Romo wanted Garrett replaced with a real HC, he'd have done it. All he had to do was say "I'm not signing a contract extension or freeing up cap space" and Jones would have waxed him.
Instead, Romo liked the buddy buddy lifestyle he and Garrett had, and loved the idea that there was no real offensive system he had to adhere to. If Romo wanted freedome to change all the run calls to passes, he had it.
And lastly, I don't think "winning" ever meant as much to Romo as it did to people like Staubach and Aikman. Romo didn't hold teammates accountable for lackluster work ethic or not putting time in. He was happy being one of the guys, being on the field and playing the game.
Anyone wanna drink these with me? They are 21 years old but they should be still good.
This is a special team with a loser coach. There's pages of material that can be written about all the mistakes Ginger made from the opening kickoff to the end. Playoff football comes down to great coaching almost more than anything else. Dallas won't advance until that issue is fixed. Garrett could lose in the divisional round with a pro bowl team.
And the irony... Romo will be the one that is gone. Yeah I blame fucking Romo. Because now as Romo moves on, Garrett gets to stay and ruin another good player in Dak.