- Messages
- 21,812
- Reaction score
- 4,320
I remember that thread but I don't remember anyone clowning you.That's the thing about the DCU.. We had a thread before the season started where I predicted 10-6. A couple guys tried clowning me because it went against how negative everyone was. Guys tried arguing with me when I said this D can't be worse than last year. It hasn't been. In fact it's been better. Not great. Not good. But better. but then when we start winning everyone gets super positive. Wait til we lose one. It'll go back. Me, I'll stay consistent. We weren't gonna be as bad as everyone thought we'd be, and now we're not as good as everyone thinks we are.
Rubbish. It's mostly just realists. Clearly 2007 is forgotten for you. You're apparently also able to discount 18 years of .500 mediocrity. We actually have very little, track record wise, to believe this year will somehow be magical. Most of us are taking it one game at a time and enjoying the ride.The thing is everyone on here is super negative and emotional all the time
I was one who was saying the defense would be much better IF: Our 3rd down conversion rate improved AND, if we avoided catastrophic injuries on the D like we had last year. Both have happened, and the defense is better with only a few personnel changes.
Most everyone who was predicting collapse based it mainly on the uncertainty of Tony's back issues and the horrible performances turned in on both sides of the ball in preseason. These dire predictions seemed confirmed by the dismal showing week one against SF. Nobody was emotional, nobody was unreasonably negative. Just like very few are over emotional or overly optimistic, right now.
There was every detached, objective, well thought out reason to believe we would be seeing 5-11. It wasn't emotion based.