dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,886
Reaction score
9,238
wasn't Cox your top player for us at 14?

you can't be this transparent can you?

I would have liked Cox at 14, no doubt. But we wouldnt have got him at 14.

I never really thought getting someone like Claiborne was a real possibility. I liked Cox alot, just like I liked Barron and DeCastro alot.

But come on, Claiborne is a much higher rated player than any of those guys
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
HeavyHitta31 saying we covet Konz and are waiting to make a jump into the 2nd for him. May involve Mike Jenkins.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
I would have liked Cox at 14, no doubt. But we wouldnt have got him at 14.

I never really thought getting someone like Claiborne was a real possibility. I liked Cox alot, just like I liked Barron and DeCastro alot.

But come on, Claiborne is a much higher rated player than any of those guys

He definitely is but we just traded 2 starters for a CB when we just spent a grip on Carr and Scandrick and still have a 1st rounder in Jenkins under contract.
 
Messages
2,450
Reaction score
0
I didn't realize that the guy we drafted was the ****** who only got his name right on the wonderlic!


Fuck!!!!!
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
So far only one Olineman.

That bodes well for us. Hopefully a quality interior guy falls to us.... at 81.
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,187
Reaction score
2,384
He definitely is but we just traded 2 starters for a CB when we just spent a grip on Carr and Scandrick and still have a 1st rounder in Jenkins under contract.

Agreed, CB was a luxury in this draft. Another classic case of Jerry falling in love and overpaying. In the meantime, no pass rush help, no bullies on the o-line, and no help at safety.
 
Top Bottom