- Messages
- 60,688
- Reaction score
- 10,756
I'd be disappointed too, but we do have alot of other picks.
One guy isnt going to ruin the whole thing for me. Unless we did something like Mike Ditka did years ago and trade away an entire draft for one guy.
- Thread starter sbk92
- Start date
I'd be disappointed too, but we do have alot of other picks.
One guy isnt going to ruin the whole thing for me. Unless we did something like Mike Ditka did years ago and trade away an entire draft for one guy.
I meant for the night. I'd tune in tomorrow to see whatever fucktard things we had in store.
- Messages
- 60,688
- Reaction score
- 10,756
I wont be surprised if we end up with two first round picks though. Depending on how that first pick plays out, they might try and get aggressive and move up back into the late first round.
pdom
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,521
- Reaction score
- 4
Soooo...how does that differ from every night?
pdom
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,521
- Reaction score
- 4
Seeing the combo of Middie's avatar and you driving in Dallas gives me a crazy photoshop idea.
I normally clean up afterwards.
pdom
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,521
- Reaction score
- 4
What do we want to see happen before our #9 pick? What would bode well for a best case scenario for us at #9?
I'm assuming that the locks are the drafting of Green, Miller, Dareus, Peterson, and Julio Jones before #9.
1. We want to see Cam Newton drafted to push others down to us.
2. We want to see Blaine Gabbert drafted to push others down to us.
3. Nick Fairley to drop to us.
I'm assuming that the locks are the drafting of Green, Miller, Dareus, Peterson, and Julio Jones before #9.
1. We want to see Cam Newton drafted to push others down to us.
2. We want to see Blaine Gabbert drafted to push others down to us.
3. Nick Fairley to drop to us.
- Messages
- 60,688
- Reaction score
- 10,756
I dont think its a dead solid lock that Julio Jones goes before we pick. I also dont see any downside to either Newton or Gabbert being there at 9, as those guys are pretty much universally thought of as the best two QB's, then a significant drop off. Some team behind us wanting a QB would pay a pretty big price to get one IMO, especially since most people believe the Redskins really want one at 10.
I'm almost indifferent as to what happens before us, as I don't think any in the top 8 will select Tyron.
I guess if we're feeling risky, it'd be nice for a few guys to drop (Julio, specifically), or a QB needy team to want to reach and trade up for Locker.
I've said for weeks I'd prefer a trade down to get an additional pick. But now that draft day is here, I really just want to not get cute and take the best tackle available when we're on the clock - and that player is Tyron.
I guess if we're feeling risky, it'd be nice for a few guys to drop (Julio, specifically), or a QB needy team to want to reach and trade up for Locker.
I've said for weeks I'd prefer a trade down to get an additional pick. But now that draft day is here, I really just want to not get cute and take the best tackle available when we're on the clock - and that player is Tyron.
pdom
UDFA
- Messages
- 1,521
- Reaction score
- 4
That's the unlucky thing about us picking at #9. It seems the tier cut-off is between #8 and #9.
Nobody before #9 has been mocked to pick someone that Dallas has been predicted to take at #9. We get first choice of the third tier of players (with the first tier ending at Green, Miller, Dareus and Peterson).
Nobody before #9 has been mocked to pick someone that Dallas has been predicted to take at #9. We get first choice of the third tier of players (with the first tier ending at Green, Miller, Dareus and Peterson).
Yeah, but if we were picking any higher, we'd ignore an obvious need and take Peterson.
Beating Philly in week 17 is a good thing.
Unless, you know, we fuck it up and take Amukamera.
- Messages
- 4,211
- Reaction score
- 370
With all the mitigating factors,this 2011 draft may go down in history as the "Cluster-Fuck" draft.