2010 Season Game Threads Mega-Merge

Status
Not open for further replies.
tiny tim

tiny tim

Practice Squad
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Well looks like the Jets will be the first team to beat the Colts and Pats back to back in the playoffs.
 
pdom

pdom

UDFA
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
4
Statistically, I don't know if it means anything, but the NFC East is a tougher division than the NFC West (49ers) and old AFC Central/AFC North (Steelers).

I wonder if the Steelers/49ers would have the same amount of success if they were in the NFC East.

Ravens, Browns, Oilers, Bengals have one SB win, three SB appearances.

Rams, Saints, Cardinals, Seahawks, Panthers, Falcons (while they were in the 49ers division) - have one SB win, six SB appearances.

The Giants, Eagles and Redskins have six SB wins, ten SB appearances. Huge disparity.

Not to say the Steelers/49ers weren't great teams, but some years they'd be 10-6 instead of 12-4 and probably may not make a Super Bowl with this tougher road.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
57,538
Reaction score
8,163
Losing today means Belichick and Brady have now lost their 3 last postseason games. All of them they were favored in, 2 of the 3 they were huge favorites.
 
pdom

pdom

UDFA
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
4
dbair1967 said:
Losing today means Belichick and Brady have now lost their 3 last postseason games. All of them they were favored in, 2 of the 3 they were huge favorites.
Keep reading...

Kind of reminds me of Montana/Walsh in 1988. They had already revolutionized football and won two Super Bowls. Steve Young was acquired because Montana was on the hot seat. However, they were under fire because they lost several playoff games. Then they won the 1988 and 89 Super Bowls.
 
sbk92

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
phildominator said:
Statistically, I don't know if it means anything, but the NFC East is a tougher division than the NFC West (49ers) and old AFC Central/AFC North (Steelers).

I wonder if the Steelers/49ers would have the same amount of success if they were in the NFC East.

Ravens, Browns, Oilers, Bengals have one SB win, three SB appearances.

Rams, Saints, Cardinals, Seahawks, Panthers, Falcons (while they were in the 49ers division) - have one SB win, six SB appearances.

The Giants, Eagles and Redskins have six SB wins, ten SB appearances. Huge disparity.

Not to say the Steelers/49ers weren't great teams, but some years they'd be 10-6 instead of 12-4 and probably may not make a Super Bowl with this tougher road.
Keep reading...

The 49ers had it easy during their championship years. They might have gotten beat down playing in the East and possibly not have won as many rings.

I don't think the same applies to Pittsburgh. They were always a tough physical team.
 
sbk92

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
dbair1967 said:
Losing today means Belichick and Brady have now lost their 3 last postseason games. All of them they were favored in, 2 of the 3 they were huge favorites.
Keep reading...

And?

Are we supposed to laugh at them for that? Jesus Christ. We're the Cincinnati Bengals of football for the last 15 years.
 
Cythim

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
dbair1967 said:
Losing today means Belichick and Brady have now lost their 3 last postseason games. All of them they were favored in, 2 of the 3 they were huge favorites.
Keep reading...

Brady is still 14-5 in the playoffs and both still have three rings. What is your point?
 
CATCH17

CATCH17

Cheerleader
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Check out Bart Scotts psycho interview.


[video=youtube;MM9mbgswhcw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM9mbgswhcw[/video]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom