Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Which players who've been here for a few years in some compacity might not make the cut?

Thinking Church gets the ax and we end up with Jones and Wilcox in the safety spot.

Don't know the contract numbers but could Doug Free be on a short leash with Chaz Green healthy and Collins versatility?

Doubt Lance Dumbar makes the team.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
I do wonder if they'd cut Free. Especially with Steve supposedly bragging up Chaz Green lately.

I can't really think of anyone else. Maybe McClain if he fricks up again? But then they have no one behind him.

Sad when you think about it. Go 1-11 minus Romo and almost the entire starting team will return intact.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
Going out on the limb of a sequoia.

I think Whitehead could be gone because there are PR/KR/offense players who are better than him. Streets is gone and I think TWilly will be reduced. The way that Whitehead made the team last year and that Brice Butler was traded for, seems to point to a need for change.

Here's what I think is going to happen:

Ed Eagan

1. There are certain qualities that succeed in the NFL right now: Odell-Beckham is not that fast nor tall or strong, he can catch anything because of handsize. Dez gets all kinds of accolades about his "talent" but aside from being very strong and violent when he runs, his catching radius is really based on his 9.75" hands. I tested this theory last year when Stefan Diggs was a prospect and I had hoped Dallas would draft him. Diggs is like 5'11" (they have him listed at 6' but that was not what he was listed in college) or big and his speed is like 4.43 so he is decent (the average starting CB in the league is 4.45). But Diggs has 10" hands and if you watched the Minnesota games, the Norv offense gets covered fairly easily so Diggs had to make contested catches (and Bridgewater is not that accurate), but Diggs outplayed Mike Wallace, Corderelle Patterson, and most of the NFC just by quick feet and ripping the ball out of the air. Eagan's hands are 9.37"

2, Laurent Robinson and Miles Austin were the last two WRs with significant roles on the team who could get open just with their speed. Robinson is still ranked 6th all time in his 10 yard split and Austin reportedly had a 40 time of 4.24 at a Rutger pro day (he ran a 4.38 at main pro day). Beasley doesnt get the prominent role for some reason and Dooley said last year that he "wants to expand Beasleys route tree" so despite him being fast and quick, they don't want him to have the distance routes (and the offense is almost all distance routes except Witten and RB checkdowns). My guess with Beasley is that Romo can't see him. This offense is not set up for Romo, Romo has adapted to the offense (that's why Garrett tries for tall WRs over those who can catch). But anyway, Eagan's short area quickness and his vertical speed is closer to Austin and Robinson than Beasley and because he can rip the ball out of the air (and has a 34" vert), Eagan has a better shot on the outside as a #2WR than Beasley would.

3. Amendola. We all knew Amendola could play and that Dallas should have kept him. But he was somehow not approved by Garrett's offense. Most of the fans thought he would be (and have) the shifty, former soccer player uncoverable WR that Welker was. Maybe he was not quite that but he was productive. I remember Jason saying something about "well we wanted to keep him..." once someone asked why Dallas would give up a WR who was starting for the Rams. Last year, it was obvious again that Dallas needs a speed WR who can play KR/PR and adds speed to the offense. So last year it was obvious that Whitehead was the only candidate. But Whitehead is not really a polished route runner and he is not great with pure catching. If Eagan and Whitehead go head to head, Eagan is going to win.

4. Need vs Depth. Its weird because they added TEs after having Escobar, Hanna, Witten, Swaim and now Gathers and they signed Austin Traylor as a UFSD but despite not being pleased with TWilly and Streets and Brice Butler still being a questionmark (after all he was not even playing really for the Raiders except in preseason games and yet "Dallas as high hopes for him"...wrong), they did nothing to upgrade WR. They have Morris, Dunbar, Rod Smith, and DMC and they drafted EE plus Darius Action Jackson. Many draft "experts" cited WR as a need because of how TWilly disappeared (and he is in his contract year) and how Streets is doing nothing. But no WR was drafted and only Eagan, North, Chris Brown and Andy Jones were signed after the draft. North, Brown, and Jones all play the same style of tall and lanky. Eagan is different. I heard on the Dallas radio station that "Jason just thinks he can put anyone into his system and doesn't need to get specific talent" and if that is the case then Eagan has a good chance. I am not sure they are sold on Whitehead anyway. It seems he was kind of a second thought on most games. I think Jerry might be a little bitter on how well Dwayne Harris is doing in NY, when Jason would not use him as a WR that often. But Garrett talks a lot about versatile athletes and Eagan, against lower level opposition, is a strong KR/PR and special teams player. But he also caught 73 passes last year in an offense that is 56-44 run/pass ratio. Just kind of makes it happen. Like Beasley did.

5. Run after the catch and Twitch. Eagan runs kind of like Edelman but is quicker in traffics than Whitehead. He seems to have a great sense of where the tackle is coming and avoids it. He can increase his speed in a chase like Dwayne Harris and not get caught from behind like Murray or Whitehead did.

I know this is odd saying all this about a player who has not played anything (and may not) and I knew nothing about the player until I watched the highlights, but Dallas has a gap in the pass offense between Witten's consistency, Dez's power and Beasley's reliability, and to me it's missing a player with rugged quickness like a Welker or a Randall Cobb (whose height, weight, 40 time and handsize are identical to Eagan).

Okay. Tee off.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,617
Reaction score
9,079
Wouldn't be surprised if one of the two vet CB's ended up being gone (Claiborne or Carr). Both only have 1 yr deals essentially.

Church could be a primo cut candidate, especially if he doesn't significantly outplay Wilcox and/or Heath. He costs a lot of money and also only has 1 yr left. If Church wins the starting job again, Wilcox could be a goner.

Cant see Devin Street here. Just not any good.

Free might lose his starting job, but I cant imagine them cutting him outright. I think if he did lose out to Chaz Green they'd keep Free as the swing T.

Leary wont be released, but he could be traded.

I don't really see how they keep both McFadden and Morris. One of them will be out. if some team were desperate enough and wanted one of these guys, we might could net a late rd pick for one of them.
 

Rynie

In the Rotation
Messages
1,321
Reaction score
54
Devin Street shouldn't have been on the team last season. I think McFadden has more of a chance than Dunbar of getting cut.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
22
Wilcox, Street, Dunbar ... I'd bet a tremendous amount of vCash that two of the three will be gone.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
22
I've never understood the infatuation with Dunbar, but clearly the franchise has had it.
 

NoShame

UDFA
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
0
Oh yes he will. Jerry has gone out of way to mention him several times.

He will hang around on scholarship. The PUP at least.

Thats what I think... He'll start on the PUP and then we'll make a decision after that.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Devin Street shouldn't have been on the team last season. I think McFadden has more of a chance than Dunbar of getting cut.

I swear I read going into last season (either in minicamps or tc) that Dooley loved Street. Article made it sound like Dooley thought Street would cut into Twillys playing time.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,617
Reaction score
9,079
Oh yes he will. Jerry has gone out of way to mention him several times.

He will hang around on scholarship. The PUP at least.

He almost assuredly wont be ready for training camp or preseason. If he ends up on PUP he has to be activated or put on IR at some point.

Other guys are going to make it ahead of him, unless some other guys get hurt there wont be a spot for him.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,617
Reaction score
9,079
I swear I read going into last season (either in minicamps or tc) that Dooley loved Street. Article made it sound like Dooley thought Street would cut into Twillys playing time.

He liked him a lot in the draft that yr he came out. It was Broaddus who kept drooling all over him and saying he would take TWill's spot last yr before the preseason started.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,617
Reaction score
9,079
He fits their RRBC ideal. What, you think EE is gonna be a 400 carry, feature back?

He will get 300+ carries for sure. Only a fucktard would think otherwise.

Dunbar isn't going to get any carries in place of the guys ahead of him.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
He liked him a lot in the draft that yr he came out. It was Broaddus who kept drooling all over him and saying he would take TWill's spot last yr before the preseason started.

I do remember the DMN or wherever story that Mid is talking about, though. It was in the offseason or preseason before last year.

I still think Garrett is the one who liked him and he was only drafted because Garrett's BFF Chryst coached him at Pitt. Maybe Dooley really did like him, or maybe the reporter got the story a little wrong. I do seem to remember Dooley praising TWill after we drafted him more than he ever did Street.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
I do remember the DMN or wherever story that Mid is talking about, though. It was in the offseason or preseason before last year.

I still think Garrett is the one who liked him and he was only drafted because Garrett's BFF Chryst coached him at Pitt. Maybe Dooley really did like him, or maybe the reporter got the story a little wrong. I do seem to remember Dooley praising TWill after we drafted him more than he ever did Street.

With Jason, the suspicious things are usually actual things. And worse, when there is propaganda, it means there is a pretty substantial flaw that is being sublimated. TWilly is flawed. He has made some big plays but then again there are parts of his game that are not even professional grade. "Coach told me to stop letting the ball come to me and just go up and get it." Uh. If in the 3rd year in the NFL you have to be told how to catch and then even he catch in question is a chest catch where the ball drops into the body, he still didn't catch it right. TWilly should be in a WCO. This offense is terrible for him. Same with Streets. Slow, can't get off the line. Dooley said Streets knows all the routes and he scouted him personally. blah blah blah. Once a player is over talked and praised for his jumping jacks, there's a good sign that Jason erred in his talent decision and is trying to cover. Beasley has never gotten the PR that Streets did. Mainly because when a player is just performing well, Jason has no explanation as to why. ��
 
Top Bottom