Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
When can Dallas cut ties with Jay Ratliff?
August, 28, 2013

By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com


IRVING, Texas -- On the physically unable to perform list for the first six weeks of the season, Jay Ratliff can play as many as 10 regular-season games or as few as five for the Cowboys this season, depending on his fitness in October.

Will they be his final regular-season games for the Cowboys?

The salary cap would seem to indicate it will be. Ratliff is scheduled to count $8.232 million against the cap in 2014. That’s a lot of money for a player unable to play a full season since 2011, and one that has seen his sack total decrease in each of the past five seasons.

Cutting Ratliff now would only put $6.928 million in dead money against the 2014 salary cap. Designating Ratliff a post-June 1 cut next year would create $5.5 million in space in 2014, but also leave nearly $4.2 million in dead money in 2015.

The best maneuver for the Cowboys would be to make a clean break. Take the full $6.928 million hit of bonus proration in 2014. A straight cut next year would save the Cowboys $1.304 million in cap space.

More importantly Ratliff would not be on the books in 2015.

Dez Bryant and Bruce Carter will be unrestricted free agents following the 2014 season. Tyron Smith could be locked into the fifth-year option of his rookie deal. The team must decide to use the option on Smith by next spring. That money is guaranteed by the first day of the 2015 league year. They have time to do a deal with Smith.

Bryant and Carter would be more pressing, and Bryant would seem to command megabucks if he has the type of 2013 season many anticipate.

By clearing Ratliff off the 2015 cap, the Cowboys would be able to structure these contracts in a more even way if they want. Or they could make the second-year base salaries high knowing they would restructure it anyway to create room, like they have done with Brandon Carr and Tony Romo, and not have to knock all of those salaries down to the minimum and create larger cap numbers in the future.

The Cowboys have made this sort of quick-and-clean decision before. In 2009 they cut Terrell Owens and took a cap hit of nearly $9 million all in one season rather than spreading it out over two. To a smaller degree they did the same thing this offseason with safety Gerald Sensabaugh.

The clock is ticking on Ratliff for a variety of reasons. The salary-cap clock is always ticking for the Cowboys
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
This definitely make sit imperative to re-sign Hatcher. You cannot let Spencer, Hatcher, and Ratliff walk. Hatcher obviously would be the cheapest of the three. Sign Hatcher to a two year deal.

For the draft: the first 4 picks should be dedicated to the DL (DE and DT) and OL (OG and OT). But we know Jerry with his 40-year old mind won't do that. Jerry will address the DL in the first, likley a DE. I can see him going OL in the 2nd round---he's due, because he's went TE and LB in the 2nd recently, so the trend would suggest OL.
 

junk

UDFA
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
This definitely make sit imperative to re-sign Hatcher. You cannot let Spencer, Hatcher, and Ratliff walk. Hatcher obviously would be the cheapest of the three. Sign Hatcher to a two year deal.

For the draft: the first 4 picks should be dedicated to the DL (DE and DT) and OL (OG and OT). But we know Jerry with his 40-year old mind won't do that. Jerry will address the DL in the first, likley a DE. I can see him going OL in the 2nd round---he's due, because he's went TE and LB in the 2nd recently, so the trend would suggest OL.

Any plan that makes it "imperative" to sign Hatcher reeks of desperation. Which, frankly, is how Dallas operates.

DL is going to be a huge issue next year.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Any plan that makes it "imperative" to sign Hatcher reeks of desperation. Which, frankly, is how Dallas operates.

DL is going to be a huge issue next year.


We are desperate. I'd rather try and fill two holes than three holes. And Hatcher is a good player. I'm not suggesting that we sign him to a Ratliff-like contract. By no means. A 2 year contract for about $6 million, wouldn't be bad for both sides.
 

GloryDaysRBack

Quality Starter
Messages
5,080
Reaction score
0
Fuck this guy. Wasn't counting on him doing shit anyways. Not worried about him not playing. We got bigger issues
 

Cowboysrule122

Draft Pick
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
0
With the 21st pick in the 2014 NFL draft, the Dallas Cowboys select...


Daniel McCullers, DT, Tennessee :towel
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
Let Hatcher and Spencer walk, cut Ratliff. The Tampa 2 needs young, hungry horses in the Front 4, not old multi-millionaires.

Sign a free agent (in his mid 20's) and draft two DL. Fix it once and for all or keep putting crappy band-aid's on it.
 

Cowboysrule122

Draft Pick
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
0
Let Hatcher and Spencer walk, cut Ratliff. The Tampa 2 needs young, hungry horses in the Front 4, not old multi-millionaires.

Sign a free agent (in his mid 20's) and draft two DL. Fix it once and for all or keep putting crappy band-aid's on it.

We'd better draft Louis Nix to then. :Dance
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Let Hatcher and Spencer walk, cut Ratliff. The Tampa 2 needs young, hungry horses in the Front 4, not old multi-millionaires.

Sign a free agent (in his mid 20's) and draft two DL. Fix it once and for all or keep putting crappy band-aid's on it.

Just shut up. You're being stupid. You don't cut three starters from one unit. Yeah just sign a free agent... what free agent do you have in mind? Yeah, just what I thought.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
Just shut up. You're being stupid. You don't cut three starters from one unit. Yeah just sign a free agent... what free agent do you have in mind? Yeah, just what I thought.

Let's keep throwing money at aging players. That has shown to be a sound strategy.

You can cut 6 starters if you replace them with cheaper, younger players. You just have to be able to evaluate talent and needs. That's where we struggle, so we throw money at mediocre old guys.
 
Top Bottom