Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
Wade Phillips reacts, explains odd pooched kickoff that led to Bears TD

05:34 PM CDT on Sunday, September 19, 2010
TODD ARCHER


One of the oddest plays of the game was the pooched kickoff by David Buehler after Dez Bryant's 62-yard punt return gave the Cowboys a 7-3 lead.


Tim Jennings smartly called for a fair catch at the Chicago 42 and the Bears needed just three plays to take the lead back with a 39-yard TD catch by tight end Greg Olsen.


Here's Wade Phillips' explanation:


"We were going to kick it to 71 [Israel Idonije] and we didn't kick it far enough," Phillips said. "We wanted to be aggressive right there and I thought it was time to be aggressive. We didn't kick it far enough and the guy fair catches it."


Buehler led the NFL with 29 touchbacks last year. Let him blast away and put the ball through the end zone (not that he's done that this year) and make Chicago drive the field.


More from Phillips below:


On the consistency of the offense: We need to run the ball better and that would have helped us, obviously our passing game, they didn't sack us one time the whole game, I'm sure his (Tony Romo) average was big and we didn't score enough.


What adjustments did they make to slow down the pass rush: Not much, the quarterback started getting rid of the ball a little quicker, we knew he was going to run around and we thought he did a good job of that. We had 2 sacks and 2 more sack that we had roughing the passer on that negated a couple of big plays for us.


On Chicago's big plays: That's what we try to pride ourselves on. Our goal going into the game was not to give up big plays with those guys because that's what they've done previously, that guy (Jay Cutler) has a big arm and they've got some real speed. One of them they threw short and made a big play but their back and two wide receivers can really fly.


Do you think this is uncharacteristic of the defense? They did some good things, I don't want to take anything away from them, but third and fifteen there's no excuse for that and there's not excuse not to cover everybody on a blitz. Those two big plays were my fault for not getting us ready to make those plays.


On Tony Romo throwing behind the receivers: I don't know, overall he obviously had a good game throwing the football. I'm sure he and I would like to have a few more, he made some great throws, I wish he could make all good throws.


On the offensive line run blocking: We got hit in the backfield too many times, we are a team, at least we weren't in the past, had a lot of negative plays in the running game, we had too many this game.


On his faith in David Buehler: I don't have a great faith but the guy made one at the end that we had to have for us to get back in the game, and it was a longer one then the one he missed. He hit them great in pre-game, he didn't miss one and I thought he was hitting the ball really well. They had a heck of a rush too, I'm not sure he didn't see the rush on the first one, they have two guys that have blocked a lot of field goals and I think they had more of a rush then what we wanted.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Just more stupidity on top of last week. We take one step forward and then two steps back. And what do you mean "fair catch" it...? You cannot fair catch on a KICKOFF!!! IT WAS FUCKING DUMB. Why not let Buehler do what is best and just boot it into the end zone?

Haven't you figured it out yet, that when you do something unconventional it always backfires on you?
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
This guy is a loser. This is where the team gets it's soft loser mental make up. Gosh Damnit! F yourself, Wade.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I think I want Bill Cowher in here to coach, but I know we won't be able to nab a coach like this again.

So, we are better off with Jon "Chucky" Gruden.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
I think I want Bill Cowher in here to coach, but I know we won't be able to nab a coach like this again.

So, we are better off with Jon "Chucky" Gruden.


No. I don't want to continue going with retread coaches. I think DeCamillis would be a great option.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
The pooch kick was the end of it. Told the wife right then and there Dallas is gonna lose this game. Wish I were wrong. Regardless if they rebound or not. This coaching duo has to be gone next season. Especially after these last two "explanations" by Wade. I am pulling for him, because he is the coach for now. Garrett? I have no time for, but, hope he rebounds as well. I "liked" the game calling a little better in this game. I wish Romo was a little more on target, and jesus, why is it almost every other defense can make atleast ONE big play to help out a struggling offense, yet, this defense (overrated, been that way for a long time) can't make one?

I thought that was Mr. Turnover machine over there? Torchin' the Dallas D? What the hell is goin on?

No retread coaches. Fuck that. I am not gonna even think about new coaches until probably next Monday, when Dallas is possibly looking at 0-3 if they don't pull their heads out.

Fucking WR's coach needs to pull Austin, Williams, and Bryant over to the side and tell em "Hey, fuckheads, we are sucking ass as a football team. Save your stupid fucking "celebrations" until or IF you fuckers get in the endzone.". This fucking celebrating after making a fucking first down is getting moronic.
 
Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
The pooch kick was the end of it. Told the wife right then and there Dallas is gonna lose this game. Wish I were wrong. Regardless if they rebound or not. This coaching duo has to be gone next season. Especially after these last two "explanations" by Wade. I am pulling for him, because he is the coach for now. Garrett? I have no time for, but, hope he rebounds as well. I "liked" the game calling a little better in this game. I wish Romo was a little more on target, and jesus, why is it almost every other defense can make atleast ONE big play to help out a struggling offense, yet, this defense (overrated, been that way for a long time) can't make one?

I thought that was Mr. Turnover machine over there? Torchin' the Dallas D? What the hell is goin on?

No retread coaches. Fuck that. I am not gonna even think about new coaches until probably next Monday, when Dallas is possibly looking at 0-3 if they don't pull their heads out.

Fucking WR's coach needs to pull Austin, Williams, and Bryant over to the side and tell em "Hey, fuckheads, we are sucking ass as a football team. Save your stupid fucking "celebrations" until or IF you fuckers get in the endzone.". This fucking celebrating after making a fucking first down is getting moronic.

Good Point,

I was getting sick of it too especially Roy's, now he has rubbed off on Dez and now he's doing it.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
I've been tired of that shit. And after a loss, ity looks all the more stupid.

Did anyone see Nicks of the Giants last night? I believe it was in the 4th qtr and the Giants are getting killed. He is on the sidelines, smiling and laughing. I don't think I saw any Cowboys players laughing yesterday, I may of missed, but, I can't believe that.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
Really, just shut up and score, then celebrate.

They probably do it because they know they aren't going to score. lol
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
The pooch kid didn't make much sense. If you want to be aggressive, try for the onside. While the odds of recovering are low, I'd imagine they are higher than a pooch kick.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
I still say you make the other team earn the yards and not give them away. There was no need for trickery by Dallas.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
The pooch kid didn't make much sense. If you want to be aggressive, try for the onside. While the odds of recovering are low, I'd imagine they are higher than a pooch kick.


But he said the guy "fair catched" it. Since when you can fair catch on a kickoff? This is two dumb mistakes in a row that have proved to be linchpins to the undoing of this team in these past two games.

WHAT DUMB MISTAKE ARE THEY GOING TO COME UP WITH NEXT WEEK? Because I cannot think of anything else... but I'm certain they will surprise me... no... that's the not the word... AMAZE is thwat I am lookinjg for. I'm certain they will AMAZE me, but not surprise me. What will surprise me is if they do not call up a dumb play.
 

Sheik

All-Pro
Messages
24,809
Reaction score
5
This team is too damned stupid to get one over on the other team. Just buckle your chin straps and play football, F the trickery. I hope we hear soon that the Razorback has been scrapped and we don't have to see Choice unless one of the other backs get hurt, or we want to try a last second failmary before the half.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
This team is too damned stupid to get one over on the other team. Just buckle your chin straps and play football, F the trickery. I hope we hear soon that the Razorback has been scrapped and we don't have to see Choice unless one of the other backs get hurt, or we want to try a last second failmary before the half.

Most definately. Trick plays are for bad desperate teams. This team isn't a bad team, they just aren't executing.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
This team is too damned stupid to get one over on the other team. Just buckle your chin straps and play football, F the trickery. I hope we hear soon that the Razorback has been scrapped and we don't have to see Choice unless one of the other backs get hurt, or we want to try a last second failmary before the half.

Being aggressive is a fake punt, an onside kick, going for it on 4th down when you normally wouldn't. I'm okay with that.

A pooch kick? What's aggressive about that? I fail to see the logic there. All that does is forfeit field position. You're waving the white flag to the return man. It's the opposite of being aggressive.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
Being aggressive is a fake punt, an onside kick, going for it on 4th down when you normally wouldn't. I'm okay with that.

A pooch kick? What's aggressive about that? I fail to see the logic there. All that does is forfeit field position. You're waving the white flag to the return man. It's the opposite of being aggressive.

The worst part is, Dallas just scored, in the lead. The defense was stomping at that point. Dallas has all the momentum and then with one stupid move, you give it back to the Bears, put your defense in a bind. Stupid ass call, even if it worked. SHould never be called in that situation.
 
Top Bottom