Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
Posted by Rafael at Tuesday, November 16, 2010

New Cowboys DC Paul Pasqualoni was one of Bill Parcells' guys. The former Penn State linebacker worked with the backers while the Tuna ran the shop, then followed Tony Sparano to Miami.

While in Dallas, he contributed to Big Bill's more ''measured'' 3-4. Not much blitzing. Play physical. Rush four, play a lot of zone behind it, and force the offense to beat you repeatedly in order to earn the end zone.

If his first defensive game plan can be considered a definitive one, Pasqualoni will return the Cowboys to the Parcells blueprint, and back down from the high-stakes, heavy blitzing that Wade Phillips preferred. That approach was tonic for a Cowboys secondary which was repeatedly exposed, beaten and demoralized in the Cowboys' three-game slide, which coincidentally began with the first Giants matchup.

Upping the Pass Rush Dosage

Let's look at two situations from that losing streak to see how Phillips' approach differed from the one Pasqualoni used Sunday.

October -- Giants @ Dallas

Late in the 2nd quarter the Giants have moved to the Dallas 15. They're in 2nd and 2 with just under a minute and a half left. Dallas leads 20-14. The eight yards on first down give the Giants a run-pass option, and Phillips sells out looking for a negative play. Note in the first slide how the Cowboys open in what looks like a quarters coverage look, with the safeties and the corners four-across, eight to ten yards off the ball:

blitz+crazy+Wade1.png


Well before the snap, the Cowboys creep one of their inside linebackers and both safeties close to the line, tipping a max blitz. This is zero-coverage, meaning there are no safeties providing deep help. (Dallas has eight defenders within four yards of the line of scrimmage.) The Giants are in a posse set, meaning three WRs and one back. The Cowboys are matching their corners man up and have a linebacker taking TE Kevin Boss. They have to chase and hold and hope the Dallas rush gets to Eli Manning quickly:

blitz+crazy+wade2.png


The rush didn't get to Manning, a problem the Cowboys have suffered all year. Steve Smith broke past Orlando Scandrick's jam attempt and Manning floated a touchdown pass to him in the back half of the end zone.

Teams could see when Dallas intended to blitz, but Phillips didn't concede. He kept calling six and seven man blitzes which gave good quarterbacks shots up the field. Here's a similar situation two weeks later in Green Bay. On a 3rd-and-4, the Packers go with three wide:

blitz+crazy+wade3.png


Dallas bunched its d-linemen, both nickel linebackers and strong safety Gerald Sensabaugh at the line, tipping another heavy rush. Aaron Rodgers, sitting in the shotgun, keeps a back and tight end to block, knowing his three targets would have single coverage with little help. Rodgers threw to Greg Jennings wide left. Mike Jenkins had good coverage but no help. Alan Ball was playing deep middle and had to cover all three corners, waiting until the ball was thrown before pursuing. He could not get to the sideline in time. Rodgers dropped a perfect pass over Jennings' outside shoulder for a 33 yard gain.


The real culprit was the non-existent rush. Note how tight Green Bay's pocket is -- none of the six Cowboys rushers are making any penetration. Top quarterbacks like Rodgers and Manning can beat close coverage if they can set their feet and wait for the WR's patterns to develop. The repeated burnings were clearly wearing on all the corners.

continued . . .
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
And Dialing it Back

This week, Pasqualoni walked back the blitzing, big time. Here's a breakdown of his rush patterns in the first half:

Eli Manning -- 25 1st half passes
rushed by 3 men -- 5 times
rushed by 4 men -- 17 times
rushed by 5 men -- 1 time
rushed by 6 men -- 2 times

The Cowboys rushed four men and kept two safeties deep on nearly every play, to take away big plays. The Giants got behind rookie Bryan McCann a couple of times, but didn't really hurt him until the second half. That deep help took away the easy red-zone passing lanes Manning had in Dallas, and make his choices much, much harder. Three times in the first half Manning got New York into the red zone. Twice Dallas got him into a 3rd and long and each time, Pasqualoni rushed just three men, crowding the end zone area.

In fact, Pasqualoni teased blitz but rushed three nearly every time New York was in 3rd-and-long. Manning had to check down much of the time. The third time, on 3rd and goal from the two, Pasqualoni called one of his few sell-out bltizes. Being rare, it generated pressure and forced Manning into a hasty throw, which McCann intercepted.

On this play, from the last red-zone drive, you see how Dallas played a 3rd and goal:

P%2527s+zone+1.png


Dallas rushes four. The corners are still playing man-to-man on the Giants receivers, as they did before. But note that two linebackers are taking away any patterns curls over the deep middle and there are two safeties sitting in the shallow end zone to jump any posts or slants from the wideouts. Manning tries forcing a fade into the back left corner of the end zone, but Orlando Scandrick, knowing he's got inside help, is able to press the deeper route and bat away Manning's throw:

Ps+zone+2.png


The windows Manning saw were smaller than the windows opposing quarterbacks saw before. The front four or three generated enough pressure to force throws on short time. The secondary wasn't perfect, with both starting corners out, but it made more plays in one week than it has all year. McCann compensated for his bombs with a pick-six. Orlando Scandrick had his most confident, aggressive game in two years. Alan Ball still looks shaky, but he snuffed out New York's last drive with his first career pick.

You go with what works. Phillips' heavy and heavier blitzes were not working. Pasqualoni's zones did.

And that's what we're likely to see going forward.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Switching it up, even if it was only for one play. That's what I like to see. Less predictability.
BTW did our man under Phillips look like a man to anyone else? It wasn't a conventional man because the corners were giving a big cushion.
 

MichaelWinicki

In the Rotation
Messages
782
Reaction score
0
Switching it up, even if it was only for one play. That's what I like to see. Less predictability.
BTW did our man under Phillips look like a man to anyone else? It wasn't a conventional man because the corners were giving a big cushion.

It wasn't "bump & run".
 
Top Bottom