The never-ending POTUS Election thread....

[Dodger12]

The very first ballot in the box that is placed in front of her has no return address:

 

[Dodger12]

Now someone please tell me again how that dolt investigator, Frances Watson, doesn't think there's any evidence of fraud? And he swore to it on an affidavit? He'd be destroyed in court but he's being protected by the politicians and liberal judges.

 

[Scot]

You can produce a video of Biden himself with a bottle of whiteout changing thousands of votes from Biden to Trump and it wouldn’t matter. The left would still debunk it

 

[Scot]

I believe that there is ZERO chance that the public as a whole accepts that there was wide spread fraud in this election.

No matter what proof is provided, no matter what theories are proven, no matter what Trumps team is able to accomplish with their lawsuits the public as a whole will never accept that this election was stolen or that there was widespread voter fraud.

Sure you will have the far left and far right and their conspiracies, but the general public will NEVER accept the truth. Simply because the mass media will not allow them to.

This time next year we will still be taking about this, the left will still say Trump is a sore loser and that there was NO widespread voter fraud.

I have ZERO faith that the truth will ever be accepted and become fact.

 

[yimyammer]

This is a video of the lady (Ruby Freeman) in the surveillance video, if I'm not mistaken. Some on-line sleuths pointed out something very interesting at the end of her video....stand by.

can someone explain what I am supposed to be seeing/concluding here?

 

[Scot]

This is a video of the lady (Ruby Freeman) in the surveillance video, if I'm not mistaken. Some on-line sleuths pointed out something very interesting at the end of her video....stand by.

A couple questions

Who is this lady and what is her job title?
Where does she work?
What offices are these supposed to be?
What are we supposed to be seeing or concluding after watching this video?
What are all of these ballots supposed to be? (Absentee, mail in, etc?)
Why are these ballots piled up in this office?
And most importantly, when was this video supposedly taken?

 

[Dodger12]

can someone explain what I am supposed to be seeing/concluding here?

In the follow up post I made a screen shot of the final moments of her video shows a box with mail in ballots placed in front of her to count. The very first ballot has no return address and should have been disqualified. The disqualification rate for this election was a fraction of what we've had in other elections.

 

[yimyammer]

The very first ballot in the box that is placed in front of her has no return address:

I dont find this suspicious, most people seem incapable of following instructions completely by being thorough in everything they do. I deal with people all the time in my construction and rental biz where I have to ask did you read the lease/plans/specifications? and the answer is overwhelmingly "no". I write everything down and make detailed plans and specs not because I think anyone will fully read and understand them but so I have proof I told them what the terms of the lease were or how something should be constructed when they do it wrong and try to blame me by saying I never told them about x, y or z.

This doesnt prove anything to me or really matter because if the ballot is designed correctly, there should be other controls to make sure the ballot is valid, not a duplicate, etc

where am I wrong?

 

[Dodger12]

A couple questions

Who is this lady and what is her job title?
Where does she work?
What offices are these supposed to be?
What are we supposed to be seeing or concluding after watching this video?
What are all of these ballots supposed to be? (Absentee, mail in, etc?)
Why are these ballots piled up in this office?

She's the lady in the surveillance video from Fulton County. She was recorded a couple of times and I believe her daughter was the one the swiped the USB card. The take away is that the very first mail in ballot in the box has no return address and should have been disqualified. As for the boxes piled up, this out new norm in how we calculate and tabulate mail in ballots. A system ripe for fraud. Welcome to the new norm.......

 

[Dodger12]

I dont find this suspicious, most people seem incapable of following instructions completely by being thorough in everything they do. I deal with people all the time in my construction and rental biz where I have to ask did you read the lease/plans/specifications? and the answer is overwhelmingly "no". I write everything down and make detailed plans and specs not because I think anyone will fully read and understand them but so I have proof I told them what the terms of the lease were or how something should be constructed when they do it wrong and try to blame me by saying I never told them about x, y or z.

This doesnt prove anything to me or really matter because if the ballot is designed correctly, there should be other controls to make sure the ballot is valid, not a duplicate, etc

where am I wrong?

Not disagreeing. But that should probably disqualify that ballot without a return address. But no ballot verification was done during the general election. That's the main issue.

 

[yimyammer]

Not disagreeing. But that should probably disqualify that ballot without a return address. But no ballot verification was done during the general election. That's the main issue.

I don't really see what writing the RA does to validate the ballot considering a person who stole the ballot could put the address there or make one up. I doubt anyone is cross referencing addresses on the envelope to registered voters and I'm not sure thats the best way to do it.

I'd be more interested in seeing a ballot with a bar code that was assigned to a pre-registered voter that requested the ballot so when the ballot is scanned, that person can only vote once.

 

[cml750]

cml, looks like this is the guy that made the accusation that the Tweets are based on. I'll leave it to you and others to judge if this guy is reliable or the information is accurate.

I will have to check that out later. I am at work right now.

 

[cml750]

I don't really see what writing the RA does to validate the ballot considering a person who stole the ballot could put the address there or make one up. I doubt anyone is cross referencing addresses on the envelope to registered voters and I'm not sure thats the best way to do it.

I'd be more interested in seeing a ballot with a bar code that was assigned to a pre-registered voter that requested the ballot so when the ballot is scanned, that person can only vote once.

It depends on the state laws. If state law requires a return address any ballot that comes in without one is invalid and has to be discarded. I do not know if that is a Georgia requirement or not.

 

[Dodger12]

It depends on the state laws. If state law requires a return address any ballot that comes in without one is invalid and has to be discarded. I do not know if that is a Georgia requirement or not.

I'd bet it is. Otherwise, someone could just collect ballots, put them in unmarked envelops and just mail them out. I'd bet it's part of the verification process and any ballot that doesn't have a return address should be disqualified. Not even opened.....

 

[Scot]

She's the lady in the surveillance video from Fulton County. She was recorded a couple of times and I believe her daughter was the one the swiped the USB card. The take away is that the very first mail in ballot in the box has no return address and should have been disqualified. As for the boxes piled up, this out new norm in how we calculate and tabulate mail in ballots. A system ripe for fraud. Welcome to the new norm.......

I just read thru the 12 pages from the Georgia official website regarding voting by mail/absentee

No where on the complete instruction manual for mail in/absentee voting does it say that a return address is required on the return envelope or mandatory in any way, or that it will disqualify a ballot if it is not included on the envelope. It does however state that a ballot would be invalidated “if” it was returned unsigned.

 

[Scot]

It depends on the state laws. If state law requires a return address any ballot that comes in without one is invalid and has to be discarded. I do not know if that is a Georgia requirement or not.

I just checked

It’s not required, nor is it listed as something that would disqualify a ballot if it does not have one

 

[cml750]

I just read thru the 12 pages from the Georgia official website regarding voting by mail/absentee

No where on the complete instruction manual for mail in/absentee voting does it say that a return address is required on the return envelope or mandatory in any way, or that it will disqualify a ballot if it is not included on the envelope. It does however state that a ballot would be invalidated “if” it was returned unsigned.

I just checked

It’s not required, nor is it listed as something that would disqualify a ballot if it does not have one

Thanks for the detective work and the info.

 

[Scot]

Thanks for the detective work and the info.

You are welcome

Now, is it strange and even suspicious that the only ballot we can see is missing the return address?

Yes

Does it mean anything hinky is going on?

No

Does it prove anything?

Also no

But...

If that box he placed on her desk is full of ballots that are ALL missing the return address then that is another matter altogether. It still wouldn’t disqualify any of the ballots but it sure as shit would raise some eyebrows/questions

The problem is we can’t see anything other than the first ballot right now

But if this lady posts a second video where she shows herself counting these ballots or showing the rest of the box’s return address’ then let us know

 

[Scot]

By the way

Was Georgia one of the states where every registered voter was sent a mail in ballot?

 

[Scot]

Please let there be enough proof to overturn this election

Otherwise we are foooooooked!

Biden's plans could add $34 billion in new taxes against gun owners, including a tax on guns already owned

Biden’s plan includes a $200 tax for each AR-15 that is already owned. This tax would also apply to other firearms Democrats label as 'assault weapons.'

www.lawenforcementtoday.com