sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Bob Sturm / Contributor


An interesting note about Doug Free this season: In the first 5.5 games, he allowed 0 sacks on Tony Romo. In the last 5.5 games, he has allowed 3.5 sacks on Jon Kitna. You could say that this is because he has something against Kitna, but I believe the truth lies elsewhere.

Around week 5 or 6, when Free had dealt with many stiff challenges early in the season so well: Julius Peppers, Mario Williams, etc, we pointed out that the Cowboys true weakness on the OL appears to be more on the right side with Colombo and Davis. Well, the Cowboys started "taking the training wheels off Free" which is a way of saying they started helping him with a Tight End or a chipping RB much, much less. Instead, the help moved more and more over to Colombo and now we are seeing more of Free on an island against a DE.

And this is where you see where Free is. Good enough that he doesn't need as much help as your RT, but still a guy who can get beat occasionally if you give him no help. So, in the last month or so, he has quickly risen up the charts of sacks allowed, and now only trails Leonard Davis for the season.

Something to keep an eye on.

=================
Play #50 - 1/10/D48 - "22" Sack
[video=youtube;m1PLnhzXd1A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1PLnhzXd1A&feature=player_embedded[/video]


What Happened: This is the very rare sack that accompanies a 5 yard gain on the fumble recovery. You would certainly prefer to face a 2nd and 5 after a sack on 1st and 10, right? Anyway, this play shows that Doug Free has had a reasonable first year at Left Tackle, but he still needs to be at the top of his game every week. A Left Tackle will always face the oppositions' best Defensive End, and the hits keep coming every week. This week, the Saints had Will Smith rushing him, and this time, Smith beats him and gets to Kitna. Pretty straight forward here. What is interesting is that this is a sack against "22" personnel, which I always talk about where the Cowboys declare run and then like to roll out play action and ambush the defense. However, this time, the Saints had seen enough and were ready to pounce with a strong pass rush as the inside man also tossed Kosier aside and nearly ran through Marion Barber, too. But, Smith beat Free quicker, and the fumble occurred. This is the first sack allowed all season in "22" personnel. The Cowboys have run 93 plays out of "22" this season (although 70 of those plays have been runs).


Season To Date Sacks
----------------------------------------------------
The Rankings for the season in Sacks Allowed among the OL: Davis 4.5, Free 3.5, Coverage 3.5, Colombo 2.5, Costa 2, Gurode 1, Jones 1, Kosier 1.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
And the truth.....shall set you free.

Remember the debate on here at the start of the season when I correctly told you Free was getting help on a regular basis? And the moro...homers wanted to pretend he was stonewalling great pass rushers all by his wittle self?

Chalk another one up for the bad guy.

The guy isn't good enough. Not now. Not ever.

Find a legit franchise LT.
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
Jesus, he has the guy blocked ,Free's back is to Kitna, but, the DE sees Kitna moving up in the pocket, holding the ball too long. And now Free is the problem? LOL. Okay. Cool. Keep reaching.

No, Free is no Odgen or Flozell yet. But, definately the LEAST of the problem on O-line.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Jesus, he has the guy blocked ,Free's back is to Kitna, but, the DE sees Kitna moving up in the pocket, holding the ball too long. And now Free is the problem? LOL. Okay. Cool. Keep reaching.

No, Free is no Odgen or Flozell yet. But, definately the LEAST of the problem on O-line.

Being the best of an awful bunch, if he is even that, doesn't make you franchise LT worthy.

I don't care what Sturm twittered after the fact to appease the legion of homers who no doubt got riled up over him releasing this dose of truth. You can't call somebody "great" this year after you just exposed him as a product of double teams. It doesn't make sense. He's throwing a bone to the homers to settle their little ****** selves down.

I was told he shut down those pass rushers by himself for the most part. Wrong. He didn't. He couldn't. He doesn't have the talent.

And the moment he stopped getting all the help, he starts getting his QB molested.

Because he's just not good enough. Never will be. Not to be the long term guy at LT. He's a band-aid you get rid of the second you find a decent alternative.

And we're not even talking about his mediocre run blocking skills when he's not pushing around defensive backs 20 yards down the field.
 

Cythim

2
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
0
That is how I have always felt about him, he is good enough to get the job done for now while we figure out the rest of the line. I'm not saying pass on a top LT if we can get one somewhere but don't reach for LT when we can get someone who can fill another hole.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Hi, I'm sbk and I'm a broken record. Hi, I'm sbk, and I'm a broken record. Hi, I'm sbk...
 

Plymkr

2
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
0
Being the best of an awful bunch, if he is even that, doesn't make you franchise LT worthy.

I don't care what Sturm twittered after the fact to appease the legion of homers who no doubt got riled up over him releasing this dose of truth. You can't call somebody "great" this year after you just exposed him as a product of double teams. It doesn't make sense. He's throwing a bone to the homers to settle their little ****** selves down.

I was told he shut down those pass rushers by himself for the most part. Wrong. He didn't. He couldn't. He doesn't have the talent.

And the moment he stopped getting all the help, he starts getting his QB molested.

Because he's just not good enough. Never will be. Not to be the long term guy at LT. He's a band-aid you get rid of the second you find a decent alternative.

And we're not even talking about his mediocre run blocking skills when he's not pushing around defensive backs 20 yards down the field.



Never stated he was the answer, just the best they have for the spot since training camp, and they did nothing about it. I would of still like Flo over there and have Free at RT.

In the offseason. I am praying there are changes, there has to be. Definately C, G's, and RT need to be addressed. Oh hell, fuck it, change out the whole bloody lot.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
According to sbk, Free is supposed to not allow a single sack this year and if he doesn, then he's a bum.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
According to sbk, Free is supposed to not allow a single sack this year and if he doesn, then he's a bum.

Negative.

But he can't have to rely on help all the time to do his job.

If you have to help out your LT on a regular basis, you need a new LT.

Some agree with me. The others will too as soon as we replace him.
 

sbk92

2
Messages
12,134
Reaction score
6
Never stated he was the answer, just the best they have for the spot since training camp, and they did nothing about it. I would of still like Flo over there and have Free at RT.

In the offseason. I am praying there are changes, there has to be. Definately C, G's, and RT need to be addressed. Oh hell, fuck it, change out the whole bloody lot.

Well then you basically agree with me.

Don't settle for Doug Free, is all I'm saying.
 
C

Cr122

Guest
I agree Free is a stop gap LT player for us, but I think he can be an every down RT for us.

I say cut ties with Colomblow, put Free at RT and draft our future LT.

If we can't find our future LT in the draft, which I think we could, then wait it out another year and draft us some Guards and a future Center.

Colomblow, Gurode, Davis, Kosier all need to go.
 
Top Bottom