dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
58,656
Reaction score
9,115
CEO Wynn: ‘I’m Afraid of the President'

By Christopher Goins

October 12, 2012

(CNSNews.com) – Steven Wynn, CEO of Wynn Resorts, said on Monday that he was sitting on his thumbs with over a billion dollars tied up because he was unsure what government program the Obama administration would unveil next, and stressed that he was "afraid of the president."

In an interview, Jon Ralston, host of Ralston Reports on NBC-affiliate KSNV MyNews3 in Nevada, asked Wynn: “You called him [Obama] a socialist. You called the president a socialist. And you used this memorable phrase that business leaders quote, ‘were sitting on their thumbs until he’s gone.’ But they’re not really. I mean, you’re not -- you haven’t been doing that?”

“Yes I have,” Wynn said.

Ralston: “You haven’t done a thing? You haven’t –”

Wynn: “Oh, no, no, no, no, no. Because I’m lucky, and I’m in business in Macau, I brought $100, or $150 or $200 million back and invested it in redoing the hotel [in Vegas] for $100 million, building new beach clubs and doing things like that and giving my employees cost of living increases, even when the place was losing money. Because I’m very lucky that we have a very conservative approach to business. We don’t believe that just because the economy jumps up and down that we should be bouncing our employees around. That’s no way to run a business.”

Ralston: “And you didn’t amass debt like a lot of the other companies did either, which helped, right?”

Wynn: “We were talking about the sitting on the thumbs remark, which I’m doing right now, which means keeping the bankroll in your pocket. I did what I had to protect my employees in Las Vegas and to protect my service levels from my existing customers. But you know that for the last 45 years I’ve always been in construction in Nevada.”

Wynn then explained that a pair of troubled business men in Vegas came up to him with a business proposal to renovate a property of theirs and turn it into a new hotel and they’d call it the Wynn Plaza. He was all for it but decided to scrap it because of uncertainty about what steps the federal government might take against businesses.

When asked what happened to the proposal, Wynn said he was unsure what President Obama would do next.

“I’m afraid of the president,” said Wynn. “I have no idea what goofy idea, what crazy, anti-business program this administration will come up. I have no idea. And I have to tell you, Jon, that every business guy I know in the country is frightened of Barack Obama and the way he thinks.”

The hotel tycoon claimed that President Obama had attempted to put himself between him and his employees by resorting to class warfare, and said he cannot stand being the target of demagoguery from someone who doesn’t understand the economy or “hasn’t created any jobs.”

“The president is trying to put himself between me and my employees,” said Wynn. “By class warfare, by deprecating and calling a group that makes money ‘billionaires and millionaires who don't pay their share.’ I gave 120 percent of my salary and bonus away last year to charities, as I do most years.”

He continued: “I can’t stand the idea of being demagogued, that is, put down by a president who has never created any jobs and who doesn't even understand how the economy works.”

Earlier on the show, Wynn boasted of creating 250,000 jobs in Nevada, which he said was 250,000 more than the president had created.
 

junk

UDFA
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
Interesting. I certainly don't agree with the concept of taxing the rich more than the rest of the country to support social programs which is what the Democrats appear to want to do.

However, I also think the rich benefit from some pretty favorable tax laws. I don't think Buffett, for example, should be paying a lower tax rate than his secretary.

Everyone pays their fair share. Are the rich going to pay in more? Obviously, as they are making more, but as long as the percentage is comparable that's fine.

Don't think tax rates should be cut for the rich as if that is going to suddenly create a bunch of jobs. It won't without demand and the rich won't create demand by paying lower taxes. However, the Republicans seem to be doing a good job of convincing their base that the rich deserve lower tax rates than everyone else. Certainly seems that way anyway.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Eh... I don't think anyone believes that the rich deserve lower tax rates. That's just a Dem class warfare tactic.

"Deserves" is the wrong way to look at it anyway. If it helps get the economy going, that's going to be good for everyone. Why should I care if Wynn is even richer as long as he's hiring people?

Besides, the taxes are a small part of it IMO. It's the over-regulation that business owners are concerned about. I know a guy who was involved in some projects involving stimulus money, and the strings attached to it were just absurd. Some of the conditions literally were impossible to meet. Everyone had to ignore them, which was the only way to get anything done. But when people in Congress try to micromanage things they know nothing about, it just turns into a huge mess.

Wynn is right overall, though, that we need to stop vilifying successful people. This is supposed to be a country where anyone can succeed, but we're making business success a dirty word. It reminds me of the kids in school who make good grades and are ridiculed by everyone for doing well.
 
Last edited:
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
0
Between the whole "you didn't build that," and the "fair share" mantras, I don't blame him.
 

junk

UDFA
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
Eh... I don't think anyone believes that the rich deserve lower tax rates. That's just a Dem class warfare tactic.

"Deserves" is the wrong way to look at it anyway. If it helps get the economy going, that's going to be good for everyone. Why should I care if Wynn is even richer as long as he's hiring people?

Besides, the taxes are a small part of it IMO. It's the over-regulation that business owners are concerned about. I know a guy who was involved in some projects involving stimulus money, and the strings attached to it were just absurd. Some of the conditions literally were impossible to meet. Everyone had to ignore them, which was the only way to get anything done. But when people in Congress try to micromanage things they know nothing about, it just turns into a huge mess.

Wynn is right overall, though, that we need to stop vilifying successful people. This is supposed to be a country where anyone can succeed, but we're making business success a dirty word. It reminds me of the kids in school who make good grades and are ridiculed by everyone for doing well.

For the most part, I agree. No one is talking about raising certain tax rates right now. However, it is probably going to be necessary at some point (along with the more important spending cuts).

I don't think it is right if the rich are paying a lower tax rate than me just because they can take advantage of tax loopholes though (as I don't think people should be avoiding taxes because they are too lazy to get off their ass and get a job). Both groups are probably small %s of the overall population though.

I don't think providing tax breaks to the wealthy is going to do much to spur the economy though.
 

jeebus

UDFA
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
0
The rich pay a far larger share of the tax burden in America than they do in Europe. But Obama going to fix that. Tax the rich enough and they won't be rich anymore and then the rich can cover 25% of our expense like they do in Europe, instead of the 45 they currently account for in America.
 
Top Bottom